There are many more instances of this pattern, but I chose to limit this change to .rst files (docs), anything in libcxx/include, and string literals. These have the highest chance of being seen by end users.
Reviewed By: #libc, Mordante, martong, ldionne
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124708
After a lot of discussion in this diff the consensus was that it is really hard to guess the users intention with their LLVM build. Instead of trying to guess if Debug or Release is the correct default option we opted for just not specifying CMAKE_BUILD_TYPE a error.
Discussion on discourse here:
https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-select-a-better-linker-by-default-or-warn-about-using-bfd
Reviewed By: hans, mehdi_amini, aaron.ballman, jhenderson, MaskRay, awarzynski
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124153
X86 codegen uses function attribute `min-legal-vector-width` to select the proper ABI. The intention of the attribute is to reflect user's requirement when they passing or returning vector arguments. So Clang front-end will iterate the vector arguments and set `min-legal-vector-width` to the width of the maximum for both caller and callee.
It is assumed any middle end optimizations won't care of the attribute expect inlining and argument promotion.
- For inlining, we will propagate the attribute of inlined functions because the inlining functions become the newer caller.
- For argument promotion, we check the `min-legal-vector-width` of the caller and callee and refuse to promote when they don't match.
The problem comes from the optimizations' combination, as shown by https://godbolt.org/z/zo3hba8xW. The caller `foo` has two callees `bar` and `baz`. When doing argument promotion, both `foo` and `bar` has the same `min-legal-vector-width`. So the argument was promoted to vector. Then the inlining inlines `baz` to `foo` and updates `min-legal-vector-width`, which results in ABI mismatch between `foo` and `bar`.
This patch fixes the problem by expanding the concept of `min-legal-vector-width` to indicator of functions arguments. That says, any passes touch functions arguments have to set `min-legal-vector-width` to the value reflects the width of vector arguments. It makes sense to me because any arguments modifications are ABI related and should response for the ABI compatibility.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123284
This is the first patch of a series to upstream support for the new
subtarget.
Contributors:
Jay Foad <jay.foad@amd.com>
Konstantin Zhuravlyov <kzhuravl_dev@outlook.com>
Patch 1/N for upstreaming AMDGPU gfx11 architectures.
Reviewed By: foad, kzhuravl, #amdgpu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124536
For the AIX linker, under default options, global or weak symbols which
have no visibility bits set to zero (i.e. no visibility, similar to ELF
default) are only exported if specified on an export list provided to
the linker. So AIX has an additional visibility style called
"exported" which indicates to the linker that the symbol should
be explicitly globally exported.
This change maps "dllexport" in the LLVM IR to correspond to XCOFF
exported as we feel this best models the intended semantic (discussion
on the discourse RFC thread: https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-adding-exported-visibility-style-to-the-ir-to-model-xcoff-exported-visibility/61853)
and allows us to enable writing this visibility for the AIX target
in the assembly path.
Reviewed By: DiggerLin
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123951
This syntax allows to modify RUN lines based on features
available. For example:
RUN: ... | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=%if windows %{CHECK-W%} %else %{CHECK-NON-W%}
CHECK-W: ...
CHECK-NON-W: ...
The whole command can be put under %if ... %else:
RUN: %if tool_available %{ %tool %} %else %{ true %}
or:
RUN: %if tool_available %{ %tool %}
If tool_available feature is missing, we'll have an empty command in
this RUN line. LIT used to emit an error for empty commands, but now
it treats such commands as nop in all cases.
Multi-line expressions are also supported:
RUN: %if tool_available %{ \
RUN: %tool \
RUN: %} %else %{ \
RUN: true \
RUN: %}
Background and motivation:
D121727 [NVPTX] Integrate ptxas to LIT tests
https://reviews.llvm.org/D121727
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122569
This continues the push away from hard-coded knowledge about functions
towards attributes. We'll use this to annotate free(), realloc() and
cousins and obviate the hard-coded list of free functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123083
This change introduces a new intrinsic, `llvm.is.fpclass`, which checks
if the provided floating-point number belongs to any of the the specified
value classes. The intrinsic implements the checks made by C standard
library functions `isnan`, `isinf`, `isfinite`, `isnormal`, `issubnormal`,
`issignaling` and corresponding IEEE-754 operations.
The primary motivation for this intrinsic is the support of strict FP
mode. In this mode using compare instructions or other FP operations is
not possible, because if the value is a signaling NaN, floating-point
exception `Invalid` is raised, but the aforementioned functions must
never raise exceptions.
Currently there are two solutions for this problem, both are
implemented partially. One of them is using integer operations to
implement the check. It was implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D95948
for `isnan`. It solves the problem of exceptions, but offers one
solution for all targets, although some can do the check in more
efficient way.
The other, implemented in https://reviews.llvm.org/D96568, introduced a
hook 'clang::TargetCodeGenInfo::testFPKind', which injects a target
specific code into IR to implement `isnan` and some other functions. It is
convenient for targets that have dedicated instruction to determine FP data
class. However using target-specific intrinsic complicates analysis and can
prevent some optimizations.
A special intrinsic for value class checks allows representing data class
tests with enough flexibility. During IR transformations it represents the
check in target-independent way and saves it from undesired transformations.
In the instruction selector it allows efficient lowering depending on the
used target and mode.
This implementation is an extended variant of `llvm.isnan` introduced
in https://reviews.llvm.org/D104854. It is limited to minimal intrinsic
support. Target-specific treatment will be implemented in separate
patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D112025
This patch provides the response and reporting guides for Code of Conduct reports. It also removes the word draft from all the documents,
adds information about the CoC committee, and a place to put transparency reports. A post will also be made on Discourse to provide more details about the history of the code of conduct, this patch, and next steps. Please see that post for full details. I will put a link below once I have it.
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, hubert.reinterpretcast
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122937
This patch unifies the wording used for readnone, readonly and writeonly
attributes. The definitions now more specifically refer to memory visible
outside the function
The motivation for the clarification is D123473.
Reviewed By: nlopes
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124124
This emits an `st_size` that represents the actual useable size of an object before the redzone is added.
Reviewed By: vitalybuka, MaskRay, hctim
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123010
In some case, GitHub will not send notification for commit access invitation. Add invitation link for people don't get notification from GitHub.
Reviewed By: lattner
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D124191
Debugify in OriginalDebugInfo mode, does (DebugInfo) collect-before-pass & check-after-pass
for each instruction, which is pretty expensive. When used to analyze DebugInfo losses
in large projects (like LLVM), this raises the build time unacceptably.
This patch introduces a limit for the number of processed functions per compile unit.
By default, the limit is set to UINT_MAX (practically unlimited), and by using the introduced
option -debugify-func-limit the limit could be set to any positive integer number.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115714
This patch contains enough for lib/Target/SPIRV to compile: a basic
SPIRVTargetMachine and SPIRVTargetInfo.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115009
Authors: Aleksandr Bezzubikov, Lewis Crawford, Ilia Diachkov,
Michal Paszkowski, Andrey Tretyakov, Konrad Trifunovic
Co-authored-by: Aleksandr Bezzubikov <zuban32s@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Ilia Diachkov <iliya.diyachkov@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Michal Paszkowski <michal.paszkowski@outlook.com>
Co-authored-by: Andrey Tretyakov <andrey1.tretyakov@intel.com>
Co-authored-by: Konrad Trifunovic <konrad.trifunovic@intel.com>
Reimplements MisExpect diagnostics from D66324 to reconstruct its
original checking methodology only using MD_prof branch_weights
metadata.
New checks rely on 2 invariants:
1) For frontend instrumentation, MD_prof branch_weights will always be
populated before llvm.expect intrinsics are lowered.
2) for IR and sample profiling, llvm.expect intrinsics will always be
lowered before branch_weights are populated from the IR profiles.
These invariants allow the checking to assume how the existing branch
weights are populated depending on the profiling method used, and emit
the correct diagnostics. If these invariants are ever invalidated, the
MisExpect related checks would need to be updated, potentially by
re-introducing MD_misexpect metadata, and ensuring it always will be
transformed the same way as branch_weights in other optimization passes.
Frontend based profiling is now enabled without using LLVM Args, by
introducing a new CodeGen option, and checking if the -Wmisexpect flag
has been passed on the command line.
Reviewed By: tejohnson
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115907
specifying DW_AT_trampoline as a string. Also update the signature
of DIBuilder::createFunction to reflect this addition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123697
We've found that there are cases where it's useful to be able to include
the same target in multiple distributions (e.g. if you want a
distribution that's a superset of another distribution, for convenience
purposes), and that there are cases where the distribution of a target
and its umbrella can legitimately differ (e.g. the LTO library would
commonly be distributed alongside your tools, but it also falls under
the llvm-libraries umbrella, which would commonly be distributed
separately). Relax the restrictions while providing an option to restore
them (which is mostly useful to ensure you aren't accidentally placing
targets in the wrong distributions).
There could be further refinements here (e.g. excluding a target from an
umbrella if it's explicitly included in some other distribution, or
having variables to control which targets are allowed to be duplicated
or placed in a separate distribution than their umbrellas), but we can
punt on those until there's an actual need.
This patch adds support for inline assembly address operands using the "p"
constraint on X86 and SystemZ.
This was in fact broken on X86 (see example at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D110267, Nov 23).
These operands should probably be treated the same as memory operands by
CodeGenPrepare, which have been commented with "TODO" there.
Review: Xiang Zhang and Ulrich Weigand
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122220
Summary:
Introduce a new function attribute, amdgpu-no-multigrid-sync-arg, which is default.
We use implicitarg_ptr + offset to check whether the multigrid synchronization
pointer is used. If yes, we remove this attribute and also remove
amdgpu-no-implicitarg-ptr. We generate metadata for the hidden_multigrid_sync_arg
only when the amdgpu-no-multigrid-sync-arg attribute is removed from the function.
Reviewers: arsenm, sameerds, b-sumner and foad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123548
The description has been updated to reflect AMDGPU MC changes:
- enabled literals for src0 of v_fmaak_f*, v_fmamk_f*, v_madak_f32, v_madmk_f32;
- enabled global_atomic_fcmpswap and global_atomic_fcmpswap_x2;
- enabled dlc with flat_atomic* and global_atomic_*.
Bug fixing and improvements:
- enabled s_wait_idle;
- enabled s_waitcnt_depctr;
- added description of s_waitcnt_depctr syntactic sugar;
- disabled SYSMSG_OP_HOST_TRAP_ACK (it is not supported on GFX10);
- corrected description of lgkmcnt (accept values from 0 to 63).
Or rather, error out if it is set to something other than ON. This
removes the ability to enable the legacy pass manager by default,
but does not remove the ability to explicitly enable it through
various flags like -flegacy-pass-manager or -enable-new-pm=0.
I checked, and our test suite definitely doesn't pass with
LLVM_ENABLE_NEW_PASS_MANAGER=OFF anymore.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D123126
The diagnostic is unreliable, and triggers even for dead uses of
hostcall that may exist when linking the device-libs at lower
optimization levels.
Eliminate the diagnostic, and directly document the limitation for
OpenCL before code object V5.
Make some NFC changes to clarify the related code in the
MetadataStreamer.
Add a clang test to tie OCL sources containing printf to the backend IR
tests for this situation.
Reviewed By: sameerds, arsenm, yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D121951
Point people to the cc1 instead of the mllvm flag, as the mllvm
flag will stop working for clang usage at some point.
Update transition state to mention that support in Clang/LLVM is
complete, and only the default switch is pending.
I noticed that when --update-section was added to llvm-objcopy it was
not added to the command guide, see
25bcd94234. This change adds it to the
docs and updates the help text.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122907
This option tells the host clang to use the new pass manager.
Given that it's been the default for a while, this seems unnecessary.
This was added in D57068.
(this does not affect any LLVM/Clang functionality)
Reviewed By: MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D122947
Brian Tracy