narrow, almost useless case where we're inside a parenthesized
expression, e.g.,
(NSArray alloc])
The solution to the general case still eludes me.
llvm-svn: 114039
part of parser recovery. For example, given:
a method1:arg];
we detect after parsing the expression "a" that we have the start of a
message send expression. We pretend we've seen a '[' prior to the a,
then parse the remainder as a message send. We'll then give a
diagnostic+fix-it such as:
fixit-objc-message.m:17:3: error: missing '[' at start of message
send expression
a method1:arg];
^
[
The algorithm here is very simple, and always assumes that the open
bracket goes at the beginning of the message send. It also only works
for non-super instance message sends at this time.
llvm-svn: 113968
a simple, quick check to determine whether the expression starting
with '[' can only be an Objective-C message send. If so, don't parse
it as an array subscript expression. This improves recovery for, e.g.,
[a method1]
[a method2]
so that we now produce
t.m:10:13: error: expected ';' after expression
[a method]
^
instead of some mess about expecting ']'.
llvm-svn: 105221
non-function-local declarations with names similar to what the user
typed. For example, this allows us to correct 'supper' to 'super' in
an Objective-C message send, even though the C function 'isupper' has
the same edit distance.
llvm-svn: 104023
consider "super" as a candidate whenever we're parsing an expression
within an Objective-C method in an interface that has a superclass. At
some point, we'd like to give "super" a little edge over non-local
names; that will come later.
llvm-svn: 104022
look from an Objective-C class or category to its implementation, to
pick up synthesized ivars. Fixes a problem reported by David
Chisnall.
llvm-svn: 101792
generally recover from typos in keywords (since we would effectively
have to mangle the token stream). However, there are still benefits to
typo-correcting with keywords:
- We don't make stupid suggestions when the user typed something
that is similar to a keyword.
- We can suggest the keyword in a diagnostic (did you mean
"static_cast"?), even if we can't recover and therefore don't have
a fix-it.
llvm-svn: 101274
receiver is a mis-typed class name. Previously, we would give a non-specific
typo-correction diagnostic from the expression-parsing code, but there
was no fix-it because it was too late to recover. Now, we give a nice
diagnostic
honk.m:6:4: error: unknown receiver 'Hnk'; did you mean 'Honk'?
[Hnk method];
^~~
Honk
honk.m:1:1: note: 'Honk' declared here
@interface Honk
^
which includes a fix-it.
We still need to recover better from mis-typing "super".
llvm-svn: 101211
we don't have enough information to tell them how to use 'strncmp'. Instead, change the
diagnostic to indicate they should use 'strncmp'.
llvm-svn: 100890
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.
llvm-svn: 100880
destination type for initialization, assignment, parameter-passing,
etc. The main issue fixed here is that we used rather confusing
wording for diagnostics such as
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char const [2]' discards qualifiers,
expected 'char *' [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
We're not initializing a 'char const [2]', we're initializing a 'char
*' with an expression of type 'char const [2]'. Similar problems
existed for other diagnostics in this area, so I've normalized them all
with more precise descriptive text to say what we're
initializing/converting/assigning/etc. from and to. The warning for
the code above is now:
t.c:2:9: warning: initializing 'char *' from an expression of type
'char const [2]' discards qualifiers [-pedantic]
char *name = __func__;
^ ~~~~~~~~
Fixes <rdar://problem/7447179>.
llvm-svn: 100832
that was present in a prior declaration, emit a warning rather than a
hard error (which we did before, and still do with mismatched
exception specifications). Moreover, provide a fix-it hint with the
throw() clause that should be added, e.g.,
t.C:10:7: warning: 'operator new' is missing exception specification
'throw(std::bad_alloc)'
void *operator new(unsigned long sz)
^
throw(std::bad_alloc)
As part of this, disable the warning when we're missing an exception
specification on operator new, operator new[], operator delete, or
operator delete[] when exceptions are turned off (-fno-exceptions).
Fixes PR5957.
llvm-svn: 99388
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
we look into a Scope that corresponds to a compound statement whose
scope was combined with the scope of the function that owns it. This
improves typo correction in many common cases.
llvm-svn: 92879
constructs:
- Instance variable lookup ("foo->ivar" and, in instance methods, "ivar")
- Property name lookup ("foo.prop")
- Superclasses
- Various places where a class name is required
- Protocol names (e.g., id<proto>)
This seems to cover many of the common places where typos could occur.
llvm-svn: 92449
class), provide a suggestion for the type or class found. However,
since we can't recover properly in this case, don't provide a fix-it
hint. Example:
test/FixIt/typo.m:8:3: error: use of undeclared identifier 'NSstring';
did you
mean 'NSString'?
NSstring *str = @"A string";
...
^
1 diagnostic generated.
llvm-svn: 92379
test/FixIt/typo.c:19:4: error: field designator 'bunds' does not refer to any
field in type 'struct Window'; did you mean 'bounds'?
.bunds.
^~~~~
bounds
llvm-svn: 92376
test/FixIt/typo.cpp:41:15: error: initializer 'base' does not name a non-static
data member or base class; did you mean the base class 'Base'?
Derived() : base(),
^~~~
Base
test/FixIt/typo.cpp:42:15: error: initializer 'ember' does not name a non-static
data member or base class; did you mean the member 'member'?
ember() { }
^~~~~
member
llvm-svn: 92355
typo.cpp:27:8: error: no template named 'basic_sting' in namespace 'std';
did you mean 'basic_string'?
std::basic_sting<char> b2;
~~~~~^~~~~~~~~~~
basic_string
llvm-svn: 92348
typo.cpp:22:10: error: use of undeclared identifier 'radious'; did
you mean 'radius'?
return radious * pi;
^~~~~~~
radius
This was super-easy, since we already had decent recovery by looking
for names in dependent base classes.
llvm-svn: 92341
tring str2;
we produce the following diagnostic + fix-it:
typo.cpp:15:1: error: unknown type name 'tring'; did you mean 'string'?
tring str2;
^~~~~
string
To make this really useful, we'll need to introduce typo correction in
many more places (wherever we do name lookup), and implement
declaration-vs-expression heuristics that cope with typos
better. However, for now this will handle the simple cases where we
already get good "unknown type name" diagnostics.
The LookupVisibleDecls functions are intended to be used by code
completion as well as typo correction; that refactoring will happen
later.
llvm-svn: 92308
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
get_origin->x
where get_origin is actually a function and the user has forgotten the
parentheses. Instead of giving a lame note for the fix-it, give a
full-fledge error, early, then build the call expression to try to
recover.
llvm-svn: 86238
Douglas Gregor