clang was encoding pointers to typedefs as if they were pointers to
structs because that is apparently what gcc is doing.
For example:
```
@class Class1;
typedef NSArray<Class1 *> MyArray;
void foo1(void) {
const char *s0 = @encode(MyArray *); // "^{NSArray=#}"
const char *s1 = @encode(NSArray<Class1 *> *); // "@"
}
```
This commit removes the code that was there to make clang compatible
with gcc and make clang emit the correct encoding for ObjC pointers,
which is "@".
rdar://problem/50563529
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61974
llvm-svn: 362034
Summary:
This new piece is similar to our macro expansion printing in HTML reports:
On mouse-hover event it pops up on variables. Similar to note pieces it
supports `plist` diagnostics as well.
It is optional, on by default: `add-pop-up-notes=true`.
Extra: In HTML reports `background-color: LemonChiffon` was too light,
changed to `PaleGoldenRod`.
Reviewers: NoQ, alexfh
Reviewed By: NoQ
Subscribers: cfe-commits, gerazo, gsd, george.karpenkov, alexfh, xazax.hun,
baloghadamsoftware, szepet, a.sidorin, mikhail.ramalho,
Szelethus, donat.nagy, dkrupp
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60670
llvm-svn: 362014
Since byval is now a typed attribute it gets sorted slightly differently by
LLVM when the order of attributes is being canonicalized. This updates the few
Clang tests that depend on the old order.
llvm-svn: 362013
When we switch to opaque pointer types we will need some way to describe
how many bytes a 'byval' parameter should occupy on the stack. This adds
a (for now) optional extra type parameter.
If present, the type must match the pointee type of the argument.
Note to front-end maintainers: if this causes test failures, it's probably
because the "byval" attribute is printed after attributes without any parameter
after this change.
llvm-svn: 362012
In particular, don't call get_target_flags_for_arch() since that
will cause an error in some situations:
If DARWIN_iossim_ARCHS=i386;x86_64, DARWIN_osx_ARCHS=x86_64, and
DARWIN_iossym_SYSROOT isn't set (due to the simulator sysroot not being
available), then config-ix.cmake won't add i386 to COMPILER_RT_SUPPORTED_ARCH
but ubsan's test/CMakeLists.txt would call get_target_flags_for_arch()
with i386, which would then run into the error in
get_target_flags_for_arch().
Having these conditions isn't ideal. The background here is that we
configure our mac-hosted trunk bots all the same (so they all have the
same DARWIN_*_archs, and we don't easily know if a mac host bot is
targeting mac or ios at the place where we call cmake), but only the
ios-targeting bots have ios sysroots available.
This will hopefully unbreak that use case without impacting anything
else -- and it makes ubsan and asan test setup more alike.
llvm-svn: 362010
Summary:
The runtimes use `*_STANDALONE_BUILD=OFF` to signify that clang is an in-tree target. This is not the case with the runtime builds, so we really need this set to `ON`.
In order to resolve the issues phosek was having with checks, we should use checks that don't link. We can use compiler-rt's `try_compile_only` as a basis for that.
This patch is *required* to be able to run the runtime libraries check-* targets.
Reviewers: smeenai, phosek, compnerd
Reviewed By: phosek
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62410
llvm-svn: 362007
Based on the overflow direction information added in D62463, we can
now fold always overflowing signed saturating add/sub to signed min/max.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62544
llvm-svn: 362006
Summary:
After https://github.com/emscripten-core/emscripten/pull/8651, Emscripten
supports the full UBSan runtime. This includes the VPtr sanitizer.
This diff allows clang to generate code that uses the VPtr sanitizer for
Emscripten.
Patch by Guanzhong Chen
Reviewers: tlively, aheejin
Reviewed By: aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, sbc100, jgravelle-google, sunfish, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62559
llvm-svn: 362004
Summary:
Currently there's not really a good way to iterate over the language runtimes a
process has. This is sometimes desirable (as seen in my change to Thread).
Additionally, there's not really a good reason to iterate over every available
language, but rather only over languages for which we have a plugin loaded.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, jingham
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62562
llvm-svn: 361999
Summary: This also normalizes the config feature that represents the windows platform to "system-windows" as opposed to having both "windows" and "system-windows"
Reviewers: asmith, probinson
Subscribers: delcypher, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61798
llvm-svn: 361998
Summary:
- By declaring device variables as `static`, we assume they won't be
addressable from the host side. Thus, no `externally_initialized` is
required.
Reviewers: yaxunl
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62603
llvm-svn: 361994
Previously the pass ran the entire llc pipeline which caused the IR to be recodegened.
This commit restricts it to just running the postrapseudos pass and checking the results of that instead of the final assembly.
llvm-svn: 361991
Summary:
When we import an alias, we do so by making a clone of the aliasee. Just
as this clone uses the original alias name and linkage, it should also
use the same visibility (not the aliasee's visibility). Otherwise,
linker behavior is affected (e.g. if the aliasee was hidden, but the
alias is not, the resulting imported clone should not be hidden,
otherwise the linker will make the final symbol hidden which is
incorrect).
Reviewers: wmi
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, inglorion, eraman, steven_wu, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62535
llvm-svn: 361989
Summary:
The `log timer dump` is showing the time of the function itself minus any function that is called from this one that also happens to be timed. However, this is really not obvious and it also makes it hard to understand the time spent in total and also which children are actually taking the time.
To get a better reading of the timer dump I added the total, children (which I named child) and also the hit count. I used these timers to figure out a performance issue and only after adding this things were more clear to me.
It looks like this:
```
(lldb) log timer dump
35.447713617 sec (total: 35.449s; child: 0.001s; count: 1374) for void SymbolFileDWARF::Index()
29.717921481 sec (total: 29.718s; child: 0.000s; count: 8230500) for const lldb_private::ConstString &lldb_private::Mangled::GetDemangledName(lldb::LanguageType) const
21.049508865 sec (total: 24.683s; child: 3.633s; count: 1399) for void lldb_private::Symtab::InitNameIndexes()
...
```
Reviewers: clayborg, teemperor, labath, espindola, xiaobai
Reviewed By: labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arichardson, eraman, MaskRay, jdoerfert, labath, davide, teemperor, aprantl, erik.pilkington, jfb, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61235
llvm-svn: 361987
Summary:
Adds a `TypenameMacros` configuration option that causes certain identifiers to be handled in a way similar to `typeof()`.
This is enough to:
- Prevent misinterpreting declarations of pointers to such types as expressions (`STACK_OF(int) * foo` -> `STACK_OF(int) *foo`),
- Avoid surprising line breaks in variable/struct field declarations (`STACK_OF(int)\nfoo;` -> `STACK_OF(int) foo;`, see https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30353).
Reviewers: Typz, krasimir, djasper
Reviewed By: Typz
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57184
llvm-svn: 361986
The powerpc64-"nonle" tests are removed. They fail because of a bug that
Drew is currently working on that affects multiple targets.
Submitted by: Drew Wock <drew.wock@sas.com>
Reviewed by: Hal Finkel, Kevin P. Neal
Approved by: Hal Finkel
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D62388
llvm-svn: 361985
As pointed out in https://reviews.llvm.org/D37813#inline-555026, the
code which is formatted does not match LLVM formatting style.
Technically this is not a problem since these tests bypass most of the
formatter, but it can be misleading.
llvm-svn: 361984
Akira Hatanaka