to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
These aren't the .def style files used in LLVM that require a macro
defined before their inclusion - they're just basic non-modular includes
to stamp out command line flag variables.
llvm-svn: 329840
Since this isn't a real header - it includes static functions and had
external linkage variables (though this change makes them static, since
that's what they should be) so can't be included more than once in a
program.
llvm-svn: 319082
Here we add a secondary option parser to llvm-isel-fuzzer (and provide
it for use with other fuzzers). With this, you can copy the fuzzer to
a name like llvm-isel-fuzzer=aarch64-gisel for a fuzzer that fuzzer
AArch64 with GlobalISel enabled, or fuzzer=x86_64 to fuzz x86, with no
flags required. This should be useful for running these in OSS-Fuzz.
Note that this handrolls a subset of cl::opts to recognize, rather
than embedding a complete command parser for argv[0]. If we find we
really need the flexibility of handling arbitrary options at some
point we can rethink this.
This re-applies 315545 using "=" instead of ":" as a separator for
arguments.
llvm-svn: 315557
It broke some tests on Windows:
Failing Tests (4):
LLVM :: tools/llvm-isel-fuzzer/execname-options.ll
LLVM :: tools/llvm-isel-fuzzer/missing-triple.ll
LLVM :: tools/llvm-isel-fuzzer/x86-empty-bc.ll
LLVM :: tools/llvm-isel-fuzzer/x86-empty.ll
> llvm-isel-fuzzer: Handle a subset of backend flags in the executable name
>
> Here we add a secondary option parser to llvm-isel-fuzzer (and provide
> it for use with other fuzzers). With this, you can copy the fuzzer to
> a name like llvm-isel-fuzzer:aarch64-gisel for a fuzzer that fuzzer
> AArch64 with GlobalISel enabled, or fuzzer:x86_64 to fuzz x86, with no
> flags required. This should be useful for running these in OSS-Fuzz.
>
> Note that this handrolls a subset of cl::opts to recognize, rather
> than embedding a complete command parser for argv[0]. If we find we
> really need the flexibility of handling arbitrary options at some
> point we can rethink this.
llvm-svn: 315554
Here we add a secondary option parser to llvm-isel-fuzzer (and provide
it for use with other fuzzers). With this, you can copy the fuzzer to
a name like llvm-isel-fuzzer:aarch64-gisel for a fuzzer that fuzzer
AArch64 with GlobalISel enabled, or fuzzer:x86_64 to fuzz x86, with no
flags required. This should be useful for running these in OSS-Fuzz.
Note that this handrolls a subset of cl::opts to recognize, rather
than embedding a complete command parser for argv[0]. If we find we
really need the flexibility of handling arbitrary options at some
point we can rethink this.
llvm-svn: 315545
FuzzMutate might not be the best place for these, but it makes more
sense than an entirely new library for now. This will make setting up
fuzz targets with consistent CLI handling easier.
llvm-svn: 312425
It's non-trivial to use weak symbols in a cross platform way (See
sanitizer_win_defs.h in compiler-rt), and doing it naively like we
have here causes some build failures:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-with-thin-lto-windows/builds/1260
Instead of going down the rabbit hole of emulating weak symbols for
this very trivial dummy fuzzer driver, we can just rely on the fact
that we know which hooks any given fuzz target implements and forward
declare a normal symbol.
llvm-svn: 312354
This should fix the undefined reference to WriteBitcodeToFile here:
http://bb.pgr.jp/builders/i686-mingw32-RA-on-linux/builds/31682
(Why does every different bot seem to have a different level of
finickiness about LLVM_LINK_COMPONENTS?)
llvm-svn: 312345
This adds a dummy main so we can build and run the llvm-isel-fuzzer
functionality when we aren't building LLVM with coverage. The approach
here should serve as a template to stop in-tree fuzzers from
bitrotting (See llvm.org/pr34314).
Note that I'll probably move most of the logic in DummyISelFuzzer's
`main` to a library so it's easy to reuse it in other fuzz targets,
but I'm planning on doing that in a follow up that also consolidates
argument handling in our LLVMFuzzerInitialize implementations.
llvm-svn: 312338
This moves the cmake configuration for fuzzers in LLVM to a new macro,
add_llvm_fuzzer. This will make it easier to keep things consistent
while implementing llvm.org/pr34314.
I've also made a couple of minor functional changes here:
- the fuzzers now use add_llvm_executable rather than add_llvm_tool.
This means they won't create install targets and stuff like that,
because those made little sense for these fuzzers.
- I've grouped these under "Fuzzers" rather than in with "Tools" for
people who build with IDEs.
llvm-svn: 312200
All this does is forward declare the interface functions (and make
sure that they're `extern "C"`), but since we're using libFuzzer from
the toolchain it doesn't make sense to include the local copy of the
interface.
llvm-svn: 312195
This implements a fuzzer tool for instruction selection, as described
in my [EuroLLVM 2017 talk][1].
The fuzzer must be given both libFuzzer args and llc-like args to
configure the backend. For example, to fuzz AArch64 GlobalISel at -O0,
you could invoke like so:
llvm-isel-fuzzer <corpus dirs> -ignore_remaining_args=1 \
-mtriple arm64-apple-ios -global-isel -O0
If you would like to seed the fuzzer with an initial corpus, simply
provide a directory of valid LLVM bitcode (not textual IR) as one of
the corpus dirs.
[1]: http://llvm.org/devmtg/2017-03//2017/02/20/accepted-sessions.html#2
llvm-svn: 311964
Daniel Sanders