r318733 introduced a build failure for native MIPS32 systems for xray due
to the lack of __sync_fetch_and_add / __syn_fetch_and_sub support. This patch
extends the existing support providing atomics so that xray can be
successfully built.
Reviewers: atanasyan, dberris
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40385
llvm-svn: 321260
Summary: Very similar to AddressSanitizer, with the exception of the error type encoding.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: cfe-commits, kubamracek, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41417
llvm-svn: 321203
There could be a situation when a specific DSO was built with FORTIFY_SOURCE option. In case asan-ed binary link against that DSO,
libasan can't handle the possible memory error because it does not have interceptors for spinrtf_chk, snprintf_chk, vprintf_chk,
vsnprintf_chk, __fprintf_chk functions. Let's interceptors for them.
Patch by Denis Khalikov.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40951
llvm-svn: 320990
At least <http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/sanitizer-x86_64-linux-android/
builds/6013/steps/annotate/logs/stdio> complains about
__ubsan::__ubsan_handle_function_type_mismatch_abort (compiler-rt
lib/ubsan/ubsan_handlers.cc) returning now despite being declared 'noreturn', so
looks like a different approach is needed for the function_type_mismatch check
to be called also in cases that may ultimately succeed.
llvm-svn: 320981
As discussed in the mail thread <https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/
#!topic/std-discussion/T64_dW3WKUk> "Calling noexcept function throug non-
noexcept pointer is undefined behavior?", such a call should not be UB.
However, Clang currently warns about it.
There is no cheap check whether two function type_infos only differ in noexcept,so pass those two type_infos as additional data to the function_type_mismatch
handler (with the optimization of passing a null "static callee type" info when that is already noexcept, so the additional check can be avoided anyway). For
the Itanium ABI (which appears to be the only one that happens to be used on
platforms that support -fsanitize=function, and which appears to only record
noexcept information for pointer-to-function type_infos, not for function
type_infos themselves), we then need to check the mangled names for occurrence
of "Do" representing "noexcept".
This is the compiler-rt part of a patch covering both cfe and compiler-rt.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40720
llvm-svn: 320977
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D41121 broke the FreeBSD build due to that type not
being defined on FreeBSD. As far as I can tell, it is an int, but I do not have
a way to test the change.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, kparzysz
Reviewed By: kparzysz
Subscribers: kparzysz, emaste, kubamracek, krytarowski, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41325
llvm-svn: 320931
Summary:
Hook on -DKERNEL_USE (which is also used in lib/builtins) to not import
strlen and not rely on write() being implemented with the stderr on fd 2.
With this, the only requirements to use this library are:
- "Good enough" std::atomic<void*> and std::atomic<int>
- abort() being implemented
- ubsan_message(const char*) being implemented
Reviewers: eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39791
llvm-svn: 320831
Summary:
This patch adds a new install target `install-compilert-rt-headers`,
that is similar to `install-clang-headers`.
It allows to install the headers without installing all of
compiler-rt.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, beanz
Reviewed By: beanz
Subscribers: smeenai, beanz, mgorny, #sanitizers, kcc, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41244
llvm-svn: 320808
Summary:
The initial implementation used an ASan like Chunk class that was deriving from
a Header class. Due to potential races, we ended up working with local copies
of the Header and never using the parent class fields. ScudoChunk was never
constructed but cast, and we were using `this` as the pointer needed for our
computations. This was meh.
So we refactored ScudoChunk to be now a series of static functions within the
namespace `__scudo::Chunk` that take a "user" pointer as first parameter (former
`this`). A compiled binary doesn't really change, but the code is more sensible.
Clang tends to inline all those small function (in -O2), but GCC left a few not
inlined, so we add the `INLINE` keyword to all.
Since we don't have `ScudoChunk` pointers anymore, a few variables were renamed
here and there to introduce a clearer distinction between a user pointer
(usually `Ptr`) and a backend pointer (`BackendPtr`).
Reviewers: alekseyshl, flowerhack
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41200
llvm-svn: 320745
Summary:
This is the first mostly working version of the Sanitizer port to 32-bit Solaris/x86.
It is currently based on Solaris 11.4 Beta.
This part was initially developed inside libsanitizer in the GCC tree and should apply to
both. Subsequent parts will address changes to clang, the compiler-rt build system
and testsuite.
I'm not yet sure what the right patch granularity is: if it's profitable to split the patch
up, I'd like to get guidance on how to do so.
Most of the changes are probably straightforward with a few exceptions:
* The Solaris syscall interface isn't stable, undocumented and can change within an
OS release. The stable interface is the libc interface, which I'm using here, if possible
using the internal _-prefixed names.
* While the patch primarily target 32-bit x86, I've left a few sparc changes in. They
cannot currently be used with clang due to a backend limitation, but have worked
fine inside the gcc tree.
* Some functions (e.g. largefile versions of functions like open64) only exist in 32-bit
Solaris, so I've introduced a separate SANITIZER_SOLARIS32 to check for that.
The patch (with the subsequent ones to be submitted shortly) was tested
on i386-pc-solaris2.11. Only a few failures remain, some of them analyzed, some
still TBD:
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/concurrent_overflow.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/Posix/start-deactivated.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/default_options.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/init-order-atexit.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/log-path_test.cc
AddressSanitizer-i386-sunos-dynamic :: TestCases/malloc-no-intercept.c
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/MemoryMappingLayout.DumpListOfModules
SanitizerCommon-Unit :: ./Sanitizer-i386-Test/SanitizerCommon.PthreadDestructorIterations
Maybe this is good enough the get the ball rolling.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, jyknight, kubamracek, krytarowski, fedor.sergeev, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40898
llvm-svn: 320740
This includes a few nice bits of refactoring (e.g splitting out the
exclusive locking code into a common utility).
Hopefully the Windows support is fixed now.
Patch by Rainer Orth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40944
llvm-svn: 320731
This includes a few nice bits of refactoring (e.g splitting out the
exclusive locking code into a common utility).
Patch by Rainer Orth!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40944
llvm-svn: 320726
Summary:
Before this change, XRay would conservatively patch sections of the code
one sled at a time. Upon testing/profiling, this turns out to take an
inordinate amount of time and cycles. For an instrumented clang binary,
the cycles spent both in the patching/unpatching routine constituted 4%
of the cycles -- this didn't count the time spent in the kernel while
performing the mprotect calls in quick succession.
With this change, we're coalescing the number of calls to mprotect from
being linear to the number of instrumentation points, to now being a
lower constant when patching all the sleds through `__xray_patch()` or
`__xray_unpatch()`. In the case of calling `__xray_patch_function()` or
`__xray_unpatch_function()` we're now doing an mprotect call once for
all the sleds for that function (reduction of at least 2x calls to
mprotect).
Reviewers: kpw, eizan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41153
llvm-svn: 320664
Summary:
Changes:
- Don't attempt to intercept GLIBC specific functions like __strtol_internal.
This is required to stop intercepting it as we leak dlerror(3) for dlsym(3)
that cannot manage to find a symbol.
- Correct interception of fstatat(2).
- Don't run a test for fgetgrent_r() that is missing on NetBSD.
- Correct link_map location (offset) in Obj_Entry on x86_64 and i386.
- Stop intercepting getpshared-like functions in pthread(3). This is feature
is not enabled by default on NetBSD as it's unfinished.
- Switch intercepting from UTMP to UTMPX functions.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, vitalybuka, eugenis, kcc
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, srhines, kubamracek, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41053
llvm-svn: 320663
This saves ~2 MB of dirty memory footprint. Can be a big deal on mobile devices especially when running multiple processes with ASan.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40627
llvm-svn: 320660
MADV_DONTNEED on Linux actually mark the pages as free to be overwritten with zeroes, but on Darwin and BSD, it's just an advisory flag (the OS cannot discard the content). We should use MADV_FREE on Darwin and BSD.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40666
llvm-svn: 320659
Summary:
Add dummy call of LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput to afl_driver before it starts
executing on actual inputs. Do this so that first time initialization
performed by LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput is not considered code covered by
a particular input.
Patch By: metzman
Reviewers: kcc, morehouse
Reviewed By: kcc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, Sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41193
llvm-svn: 320643
Summary:
The first and only function to start with allows to set the soft or hard RSS
limit at runtime. Add associated tests.
Reviewers: alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: mgorny, #sanitizers, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41128
llvm-svn: 320611
Summary:
See D40657 & D40679 for previous versions of this patch & description.
A couple of things were fixed here to have it not break some bots.
Weak symbols can't be used with `SANITIZER_GO` so the previous version was
breakin TsanGo. I set up some additional local tests and those pass now.
I changed the workaround for the glibc vDSO issue: `__progname` is initialized
after the vDSO and is actually public and of known type, unlike
`__vdso_clock_gettime`. This works better, and with all compilers.
The rest is the same.
Reviewers: alekseyshl
Reviewed By: alekseyshl
Subscribers: srhines, kubamracek, krytarowski, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41121
llvm-svn: 320594
Summary:
getScudoChunk function is implicitly inlined for optimized builds on
clang, but not on gcc. It's a small enough function that it seems
sensible enough to just inline it by default.
Reviewers: cryptoad, alekseyshl
Reviewed By: cryptoad
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41138
llvm-svn: 320592
This change makes XRay print the log file output only when the verbosity
level is higher than 0. It reduces the log spam in the default case when
we want XRay running silently, except when there are actual
fatal/serious errors.
We also update the documentation to show how to get the information
after the change to the default behaviour.
llvm-svn: 320550
Summary: This brings CPU overhead on bzip2 down from 5.5x to 2x.
Reviewers: kcc, alekseyshl
Subscribers: kubamracek, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41137
llvm-svn: 320538
This also slightly refactors the code that's checking the directory
presence which allows eliminating one unnecessary variable.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40637
llvm-svn: 320446
Summary:
Redo of D40657, which had the initial discussion. The initial code had to move
into a libcdep file, and things had to be shuffled accordingly.
`NanoTime` is a time sink when checking whether or not to release memory to
the OS. While reducing the amount of calls to said function is in the works,
another solution that was found to be beneficial was to use a timing function
that can leverage the vDSO.
We hit a couple of snags along the way, like the fact that the glibc crashes
when clock_gettime is called from a preinit_array, or the fact that
`__vdso_clock_gettime` is mangled (for security purposes) and can't be used
directly, and also that clock_gettime can be intercepted.
The proposed solution takes care of all this as far as I can tell, and
significantly improve performances and some Scudo load tests with memory
reclaiming enabled.
@mcgrathr: please feel free to follow up on
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40657#940857 here. I posted a reply at
https://reviews.llvm.org/D40657#940974.
Reviewers: alekseyshl, krytarowski, flowerhack, mcgrathr, kubamracek
Reviewed By: alekseyshl, krytarowski
Subscribers: #sanitizers, mcgrathr, srhines, llvm-commits, kubamracek
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40679
llvm-svn: 320409
Summary:
Include <sys/tls.h> for:
- struct tls_tcb - thread control block structure
- __HAVE___LWP_GETTCB_FAST - __lwp_gettcb_fast() is available
- __HAVE___LWP_GETPRIVATE_FAST - __lwp_getprivate_fast() is available
- __HAVE_TLS_VARIANT_I - TLS Variant I for this architecture
- __HAVE_TLS_VARIANT_II - TLS Variant II for this architecture
Rename ThreadSelfSegbase() to ThreadSelfTlsTcb and switch it
to retrieve in a portable way TCB.
Switch ThreadSelf() to retrieve pthread from struct tcb_tls.
Use dl_iterate_phdr() to find out the size of TLS block of
the main program.
Correct the index of the TLS block of the main program
(dlpi_tls_modid); it's 1, not 2.
New NetBSD code is now CPU (NetBSD port) agnostic.
Stop sharing the same code with FreeBSD.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: dvyukov, joerg, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: emaste, kubamracek, llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40159
llvm-svn: 320234
Summary:
This tests must be linked with -lintl for the gettext(3) features.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41013
llvm-svn: 320226
Summary:
This test uses GNU-specific extension to libc: tdestroy() and as-is is not compatible with NetBSD.
Sponsored by <The NetBSD Foundation>
Reviewers: joerg, eugenis, vitalybuka
Reviewed By: vitalybuka
Subscribers: llvm-commits, #sanitizers
Tags: #sanitizers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41011
llvm-svn: 320225
Petr Hosek