to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Initially, in https://reviews.llvm.org/D44890, I had these defined as
empty functions inside the header when the respective event listener
was not built in. As done in that commit, that wasn't correct, because
it was a ODR violation. Krasimir hot-fixed that in r333265, but that
wasn't quite right either, because it'd lead to the symbol not being
available.
Instead just move the fallbacksto ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp. Could
define them as static inlines in the header too, but I don't think it
matters.
Reviewers: whitequark
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49654
llvm-svn: 337930
This includes llvm-c/TargetMachine.h which is logically part of
libTarget (since libTarget implements llvm-c/TargetMachine.h's
functions).
llvm-svn: 328394
IMHO it is an antipattern to have a enum value that is Default.
At any given piece of code it is not clear if we have to handle
Default or if has already been mapped to a concrete value. In this
case in particular, only the target can do the mapping and it is nice
to make sure it is always done.
This deletes the two default enum values of CodeModel and uses an
explicit Optional<CodeModel> when it is possible that it is
unspecified.
llvm-svn: 309911
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
r180893 added an indirect include of llvm/Config/Targets.def to
llvm/Support/CodeGen.h, which in turn is included by things like
llvm/IR/Module.h. After a full build of LLVM and Clang, ninja had to
rebuild 1274 files after reconfiguring.
This commit strips CodeGen.h back down to just a pile of enums and moves
the expensive includes over to CodeGenCWrappers.h (which is only
included in two places). This gets ninja down to 88 files if you
reconfigure with, e.g., -DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=X86.
llvm-svn: 260835
Summary: Since you cannot call finalizeObject manually through the C-API and other functions from the C-API automatically call it, LLVMRunStaticConstructors should also call it or otherwise you cannot call it without first calling a workaround function (or call any other function from the C-API which implicitly finalizes the object).
Reviewers: dnovillo, spatel, bkramer, deadalnix, joker.eph, echristo, lhames
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16188
llvm-svn: 257849
There is an ODR conflict between lib/ExecutionEngine/ExecutionEngineBindings.cpp
and lib/Target/TargetMachineC.cpp. The inline definitions should simply
be marked static (thanks dblaikie for the hint).
llvm-svn: 243298
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
The ExecutionEngine will act as an exception and will be unsafe to
be reused across context. We don't enforce this rule but undefined
behavior can occurs if the user tries to do it.
Reviewers: lhames
Subscribers: echristo, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11110
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 242414
Summary:
This change is part of a series of commits dedicated to have a single
DataLayout during compilation by using always the one owned by the
module.
The ExecutionEngine will act as an exception and will be unsafe to
be reused across context. We don't enforce this rule but undefined
behavior can occurs if the user tries to do it.
Reviewers: lhames
Subscribers: echristo, llvm-commits, rafael, yaron.keren
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11110
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 242387
If the type isn't trivially moveable emplace can skip a potentially
expensive move. It also saves a couple of characters.
Call sites were found with the ASTMatcher + some semi-automated cleanup.
memberCallExpr(
argumentCountIs(1), callee(methodDecl(hasName("push_back"))),
on(hasType(recordDecl(has(namedDecl(hasName("emplace_back")))))),
hasArgument(0, bindTemporaryExpr(
hasType(recordDecl(hasNonTrivialDestructor())),
has(constructExpr()))),
unless(isInTemplateInstantiation()))
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 238602
remove ExecutionEngine's dependence on CodeGen. NFC.
This is a follow-up to r238080.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9830
llvm-svn: 238244
This is part of the work to remove TargetMachine::resetTargetOptions.
In this patch, instead of updating global variable NoFramePointerElim in
resetTargetOptions, its use in DisableFramePointerElim is replaced with a call
to TargetFrameLowering::noFramePointerElim. This function determines on a
per-function basis if frame pointer elimination should be disabled.
There is no change in functionality except that cl:opt option "disable-fp-elim"
can now override function attribute "no-frame-pointer-elim".
llvm-svn: 238080
The patch is generated using clang-tidy misc-use-override check.
This command was used:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py \
-checks='-*,misc-use-override' -header-filter='llvm|clang' \
-j=32 -fix -format
http://reviews.llvm.org/D8925
llvm-svn: 234679
be deleted. This will be reapplied as soon as possible and before
the 3.6 branch date at any rate.
Approved by Jim Grosbach, Lang Hames, Rafael Espindola.
This reverts commits r215111, 215115, 215116, 215117, 215136.
llvm-svn: 215154
I am sure we will be finding bits and pieces of dead code for years to
come, but this is a good start.
Thanks to Lang Hames for making MCJIT a good replacement!
llvm-svn: 215111
This patch adds the target analysis passes (usually TargetTransformInfo) to the
codgen pipeline. We also expose now the AddAnalysisPasses method through the C
API, because the optimizer passes would also benefit from better target-specific
cost models.
Reviewed by Andrew Kaylor
llvm-svn: 199926
It's useful for the memory managers that are allocating a section to know what the name of the section is.
At a minimum, this is useful for low-level debugging - it's customary for JITs to be able to tell you what
memory they allocated, and as part of any such dump, they should be able to tell you some meta-data about
what each allocation is for. This allows clients that supply their own memory managers to do this.
Additionally, we also envision the SectionName being useful for passing meta-data from within LLVM to an LLVM
client.
This changes both the C and C++ APIs, and all of the clients of those APIs within LLVM. I'm assuming that
it's safe to change the C++ API because that API is allowed to change. I'm assuming that it's safe to change
the C API because we haven't shipped the API in a release yet (LLVM 3.3 doesn't include the MCJIT memory
management C API).
llvm-svn: 191804
the C API to provide their own way of allocating JIT memory (both code
and data) and finalizing memory permissions (page protections, cache
flush).
llvm-svn: 182448
the C API to provide their own way of allocating JIT memory (both code
and data) and finalizing memory permissions (page protections, cache
flush).
llvm-svn: 182408
CodeModel: It's now possible to create an MCJIT instance with any CodeModel you like. Previously it was only possible to
create an MCJIT that used CodeModel::JITDefault.
EnableFastISel: It's now possible to turn on the fast instruction selector.
The CodeModel option required some trickery. The problem is that previously, we were ensuring future binary compatibility in
the MCJITCompilerOptions by mandating that the user bzero's the options struct and passes the sizeof() that he saw; the
bindings then bzero the remaining bits. This works great but assumes that the bitwise zero equivalent of any field is a
sensible default value.
But this is not the case for LLVMCodeModel, or its internal equivalent, llvm::CodeModel::Model. In both of those, the default
for a JIT is CodeModel::JITDefault (or LLVMCodeModelJITDefault), which is not bitwise zero.
Hence this change introduces LLVMInitializeMCJITCompilerOptions(), which will initialize the user's options struct with
defaults. The user will use this in the same way that they would have previously used memset() or bzero(). MCJITCAPITest.cpp
illustrates the change, as does the comment in ExecutionEngine.h.
llvm-svn: 180893
the things, and renames it to CBindingWrapping.h. I also moved
CBindingWrapping.h into Support/.
This new file just contains the macros for defining different wrap/unwrap
methods.
The calls to those macros, as well as any custom wrap/unwrap definitions
(like for array of Values for example), are put into corresponding C++
headers.
Doing this required some #include surgery, since some .cpp files relied
on the fact that including Wrap.h implicitly caused the inclusion of a
bunch of other things.
This also now means that the C++ headers will include their corresponding
C API headers; for example Value.h must include llvm-c/Core.h. I think
this is harmless, since the C API headers contain just external function
declarations and some C types, so I don't believe there should be any
nasty dependency issues here.
llvm-svn: 180881
Re-submitting with fix for OCaml dependency problems (removing dependency on SectionMemoryManager when it isn't used).
Patch by Fili Pizlo
llvm-svn: 180720
Sooooo many of these had incorrect or strange main module includes.
I have manually inspected all of these, and fixed the main module
include to be the nearest plausible thing I could find. If you own or
care about any of these source files, I encourage you to take some time
and check that these edits were sensible. I can't have broken anything
(I strictly added headers, and reordered them, never removed), but they
may not be the headers you'd really like to identify as containing the
API being implemented.
Many forward declarations and missing includes were added to a header
files to allow them to parse cleanly when included first. The main
module rule does in fact have its merits. =]
llvm-svn: 169131
Chandler Carruth