to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290
llvm-svn: 331272
Summary:
Before this change, AttributeLists stored a pair of index and
AttributeSet. This is memory efficient if most arguments do not have
attributes. However, it requires doing a search over the pairs to test
an argument or function attribute. Profiling shows that this loop was
0.76% of the time in 'opt -O2' of sqlite3.c, because LLVM constantly
tests values for nullability.
This was worth about 2.5% of mid-level optimization cycles on the
sqlite3 amalgamation. Here are the full perf results:
https://reviews.llvm.org/P7995
Here are just the before and after cycle counts:
```
$ perf stat -r 5 ./opt_before -O2 sqlite3.bc -o /dev/null
13,274,181,184 cycles # 3.047 GHz ( +- 0.28% )
$ perf stat -r 5 ./opt_after -O2 sqlite3.bc -o /dev/null
12,906,927,263 cycles # 3.043 GHz ( +- 0.51% )
```
This patch *does not* change the indices used to query attributes, as
requested by reviewers. Tracking whether an index is usable for array
indexing is a huge pain that affects many of the internal APIs, so it
would be good to come back later and do a cleanup to remove this
internal adjustment.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc
Subscribers: javed.absar, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D32819
llvm-svn: 303654
Remove the temporary, poorly named getSlotSet method which did the same
thing. Also remove getSlotNode, which is a hold-over from when we were
dealing with AttributeSetNode* instead of AttributeSet.
llvm-svn: 301267
Summary:
For now, it just wraps AttributeSetNode*. Eventually, it will hold
AvailableAttrs as an inline bitset, and adding and removing enum
attributes will be super cheap.
This sinks AttributeSetNode back down to lib/IR/AttributeImpl.h.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc
Subscribers: llvm-commits, jfb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31940
llvm-svn: 300014
This re-lands r299875.
I introduced a bug in Clang code responsible for replacing K&R, no
prototype declarations with a real function definition with a prototype.
The bug was here:
// Collect any return attributes from the call.
- if (oldAttrs.hasAttributes(llvm::AttributeList::ReturnIndex))
- newAttrs.push_back(llvm::AttributeList::get(newFn->getContext(),
- oldAttrs.getRetAttributes()));
+ newAttrs.push_back(oldAttrs.getRetAttributes());
Previously getRetAttributes() carried AttributeList::ReturnIndex in its
AttributeList. Now that we return the AttributeSetNode* directly, it no
longer carries that index, and we call this overload with a single node:
AttributeList::get(LLVMContext&, ArrayRef<AttributeSetNode*>)
That aborted with an assertion on x86_32 targets. I added an explicit
triple to the test and added CHECKs to help find issues like this in the
future sooner.
llvm-svn: 299899
Summary:
AttributeList::get(Fn|Ret|Param)Attributes no longer creates a temporary
AttributeList just to hide the AttributeSetNode type.
I've also added a factory method to create AttributeLists from a
parallel array of AttributeSetNodes. I think this simplifies
construction of AttributeLists when rewriting function prototypes.
Previously we would test if a particular index had attributes, and
conditionally add a temporary attribute list to a vector. Now the
attribute set vector is parallel to the argument vector already that
these passes already construct.
My long term vision is to wrap AttributeSetNode* inside an AttributeSet
type that holds the enum attributes, but that will come in a follow up
change.
I haven't done any performance measurements for this change because
profiling hasn't shown that any of the affected code is hot.
Reviewers: pete, chandlerc, sanjoy, hfinkel
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31198
llvm-svn: 299875
Summary:
This class is a list of AttributeSetNodes corresponding the function
prototype of a call or function declaration. This class used to be
called ParamAttrListPtr, then AttrListPtr, then AttributeSet. It is
typically accessed by parameter and return value index, so
"AttributeList" seems like a more intuitive name.
Rename AttributeSetImpl to AttributeListImpl to follow suit.
It's useful to rename this class so that we can rename AttributeSetNode
to AttributeSet later. AttributeSet is the set of attributes that apply
to a single function, argument, or return value.
Reviewers: sanjoy, javed.absar, chandlerc, pete
Reviewed By: pete
Subscribers: pete, jholewinski, arsenm, dschuff, mehdi_amini, jfb, nhaehnle, sbc100, void, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31102
llvm-svn: 298393
Summary:
This kill various depreacated API related to attribute :
- The deprecated C API attribute based on LLVMAttribute enum.
- The Raw attribute set format (planned to be removed in 4.0).
Reviewers: bkramer, echristo, mehdi_amini, void
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23039
llvm-svn: 286062
Summary: The current naming not only doesn't convey the meaning of what this does, but worse, it convey the wrong meaning. This was a major source of confusion understanding the code, so I'm applying the boy scout rule here and making it better after I leave.
Reviewers: void, bkramer, whitequark
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21264
llvm-svn: 272725
Summary: This also deprecated the get attribute function familly.
Reviewers: Wallbraker, whitequark, joker.eph, echristo, rafael, jyknight
Subscribers: axw, joker.eph, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19181
llvm-svn: 272504
`allocsize` is a function attribute that allows users to request that
LLVM treat arbitrary functions as allocation functions.
This patch makes LLVM accept the `allocsize` attribute, and makes
`@llvm.objectsize` recognize said attribute.
The review for this was split into two patches for ease of reviewing:
D18974 and D14933. As promised on the revisions, I'm landing both
patches as a single commit.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D14933
llvm-svn: 266032
compiler-specific issues. Instead, repeat an 'operator delete' definition in
each derived class that is actually deleted, and give up on the static type
safety of an error when sized delete is accidentally used on a type derived
from TrailingObjects.
llvm-svn: 260190
This fixes undefined behavior in C++14 due to the size of the object being
deleted being different from sizeof(dynamic type) when it is allocated with
trailing objects.
MSVC seems to have several bugs around using-declarations changing the access
of a member inherited from a base class, so use forwarding functions instead of
using-declarations to make TrailingObjects::operator delete accessible where
desired.
llvm-svn: 260180
The Windows bots have been failing for the last two days, with:
FAILED: C:\PROGRA~2\MICROS~1.0\VC\bin\amd64\cl.exe -c LLVMContextImpl.cpp
D:\buildslave\clang-x64-ninja-win7\llvm\lib\IR\LLVMContextImpl.cpp(137) :
error C2248: 'llvm::TrailingObjects<llvm::AttributeSetImpl,
llvm::IndexAttrPair>::operator delete' :
cannot access private member declared in class 'llvm::AttributeSetImpl'
TrailingObjects.h(298) : see declaration of
'llvm::TrailingObjects<llvm::AttributeSetImpl,
llvm::IndexAttrPair>::operator delete'
AttributeImpl.h(213) : see declaration of 'llvm::AttributeSetImpl'
llvm-svn: 260053
-fsized-deallocation. Disable sized deallocation for all objects derived from
TrailingObjects, as we expect the storage allocated for these objects to be
larger than the size of their dynamic type.
llvm-svn: 259942
The majority of attribute queries checks for the existence of an enum
attribute in the FunctionIndex slot. We only have 48 of those and can
therefore summarize them in an uint64_t bitset which measurably improves
compile time.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16618
llvm-svn: 259252
The majority of queries just checks for the existince of an enum
attribute. We only have 48 of those and can summaryiz them in an
uint64_t bitfield so we can avoid searching the list. This improves
"opt" compile time by 1-4% in my measurements.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16617
llvm-svn: 259251
This is intended to help support the idiom of a class that has some
other objects (or multiple arrays of different types of objects)
appended on the end, which is used quite heavily in clang.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D11272
llvm-svn: 244164
The patch is generated using this command:
tools/clang/tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
llvm/lib/
Thanks to Eugene Kosov for the original patch!
llvm-svn: 240137
Adds static_asserts to ensure alignment of concatenated objects is
correct, and fixes them where they are not.
Also changes the definition of AlignOf to use constexpr, except on
MSVC, to avoid enum comparison warnings from GCC.
(There's not too much of this in llvm itself, most of the fun is in
clang).
This seems to make LLVM actually work without Bus Error on 32bit
sparc.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D10271
llvm-svn: 239872
Summary:
If a pointer is marked as dereferenceable_or_null(N), LLVM assumes it
is either `null` or `dereferenceable(N)` or both. This change only
introduces the attribute and adds a token test case for the `llvm-as`
/ `llvm-dis`. It does not hook up other parts of the optimizer to
actually exploit the attribute -- those changes will come later.
For pointers in address space 0, `dereferenceable(N)` is now exactly
equivalent to `dereferenceable_or_null(N)` && `nonnull`. For other
address spaces, `dereferenceable(N)` is potentially weaker than
`dereferenceable_or_null(N)` && `nonnull` (since we could have a null
`dereferenceable(N)` pointer).
The motivating case for this change is Java (and other managed
languages), where pointers are either `null` or dereferenceable up to
some usually known-at-compile-time constant offset.
Reviewers: rafael, hfinkel
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: nicholas, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8650
llvm-svn: 235132
Add header guards to files that were missing guards. Remove #endif comments
as they don't seem common in LLVM (we can easily add them back if we decide
they're useful)
Changes made by clang-tidy with minor tweaks.
llvm-svn: 215558
This attribute indicates that the parameter or return pointer is
dereferenceable. Practically speaking, loads from such a pointer within the
associated byte range are safe to speculatively execute. Such pointer
parameters are common in source languages (C++ references, for example).
llvm-svn: 213385
Currently the only kind of integer IR attributes that we have are alignment
attributes, and so the attribute kind that takes an integer parameter is called
AlignAttr, but that will change (we'll soon be adding a dereferenceable
attribute that also takes an integer value). Accordingly, rename AlignAttribute
to IntAttribute (class names, enums, etc.).
No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 213352
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file. The memory leaks in this version have been fixed. Thanks
Alexey for pointing them out.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 195064
This change is incorrect. If you delete virtual destructor of both a base class
and a subclass, then the following code:
Base *foo = new Child();
delete foo;
will not cause the destructor for members of Child class. As a result, I observe
plently of memory leaks. Notable examples I investigated are:
ObjectBuffer and ObjectBufferStream, AttributeImpl and StringSAttributeImpl.
llvm-svn: 194997
This patch removes most of the trivial cases of weak vtables by pinning them to
a single object file.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2068
Reviewed by Andy
llvm-svn: 194865
Chandler Carruth