Our mangling of <destructor-name> wasn't quite right: we'd introduce
mangling substitutions where one shouldn't be possible. We also didn't
correctly handle the case where the destroyed type was not dependent but
still a TemplateSpecializationType.
N.B. There isn't a mangling for a template-template parameter showing up
as the destroyed type. We do the 'obvious' thing and mangle the index
of the parameter.
llvm-svn: 229615
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
David Majnemer