Currently, when doing a ASanified build of LLVM (with Clang, compiler-rt and libcxx) via -DLLVM_USE_SANITIZER=Address and not using any other options, we already disable building of sanitizer runtimes (because they themselves can’t be sanitized) and also exclude the sanitizer tests. However, the same is not done for the profiling runtime, which will build fine, but then all the tests fail due to linking errors. Let’s disable the profiling runtime as well (when LLVM_USE_SANITIZER is set).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24657
llvm-svn: 281815
The ValueSymbolTable is used to detect name conflict and rename
instructions automatically. This is not needed when the value
names are automatically discarded by the LLVMContext.
No functional change intended, just saving a little bit of memory.
This is a recommit of r281806 after fixing the accessor to return
a pointer instead of a reference and updating all the call-sites.
llvm-svn: 281813
The ValueSymbolTable is used to detect name conflict and rename
instructions automatically. This is not needed when the value
names are automatically discarded by the LLVMContext.
No functional change intended, just saving a little bit of memory.
llvm-svn: 281806
Where possible, remove the const char* version. To keep the
risk and impact here minimal, I've only done the simplest
functions.
In the process, I found a few opportunities for adding some
unit tests, so I added those as well.
Tested on Windows, Linux, and OSX.
llvm-svn: 281799
This refactors the cstring literal creation as mentioned in the couple of FIXMEs
littered in the various invocations to CreateMetadataVar. This centralises the
definition of the literals, and will enable changing the literal creation to a
single site. NFC.
llvm-svn: 281798
* recurse through intermediate LabelStmts and AttributedStmts when checking
whether a statement inside a switch declares a variable
* if the end of a compound statement is reachable from the chosen case label,
and the compound statement contains a variable declaration, it's not valid
to just emit the contents of the compound statement -- we must emit the
statement itself or we lose the scope (and thus end lifetimes at the wrong
point)
llvm-svn: 281797
Summary: i8, i16, and f16 values are not extended to 32-bit in the HSA kernel ABI.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, llvm-commits, yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24621
llvm-svn: 281789
This supports creating symlinks to tools in different directories than
the tool is built to. This is useful for the LLDB framework build which
I’m sending patches for shortly.
llvm-svn: 281788
These clean up some unnecessary or instructions in
cases with complex loops.
In the original testcase I noticed this, the same
or with exec was repeated 5 or 6 times in a row. With
this only one is emitted or sometimes a copy.
llvm-svn: 281786
This is a fix for PR30318.
Clang may generate IR where an alloca is already live when entering a
BB with lifetime.start. In this case, conservatively extend the
alloca lifetime all the way back to the block entry.
llvm-svn: 281784
When trying to recolor a register we may split live-ranges in the
process. When we create new live-ranges we will have to process them,
but when we move a register from Assign to Split, the allocation is not
changed until the whole recoloring session is successful.
Therefore, only push the live-ranges that changed from Assign to
Split when the recoloring is successful.
Same as the previous commit, I was not able to produce a test case that
reproduce the problem with in-tree targets.
Note: The bug has been here since the recoloring scheme has been added
back in r200883 (Feb 2014).
llvm-svn: 281783
When last chance recoloring is used, the list of NewVRegs may not be
empty when calling selectOrSplitImpl. Indeed, another coloring may have
taken place with splitting/spilling in the same recoloring session.
Relax an assertion to take this into account and adapt a condition to
act as if the NewVRegs were local to this selectOrSplitImpl instance.
Unfortunately I am unable to produce a test case for this, I was only
able to reproduce the conditions on an out-of-tree target.
llvm-svn: 281782
Summary:
The main challenge in lowering kernel arguments for AMDGPU is determing the
memory type of the argument. The generic calling convention code assumes
that only legal register types can be stored in memory, but this is not the
case for AMDGPU.
This consolidates all the logic AMDGPU uses for deducing memory types into a single
function. This will make it much easier to support different ABIs in the future.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, wdng, nhaehnle, llvm-commits, yaxunl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24614
llvm-svn: 281781
Summary:
mesa3d will use the same kernel calling convention as amdhsa, but it will
handle everything else like the default 'unknown' OS type.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, llvm-commits, kzhuravl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22783
llvm-svn: 281779
This matches gold and bfd, and is pretty much required by some linker
scripts. They end with commands like
foo 0 : { *(bar) }
if we put any SHF_ALLOC sections after they can have an address that
is too low.
llvm-svn: 281778
computeKnownBits() already works for integer vectors, so allow vector types when calling that from InstCombine.
I don't think the change to use m_APInt in computeKnownBits is strictly necessary because we do check for
ConstantVector later, but it's more efficient to handle the splat case without needing to loop on vector elements.
This should work with InstSimplify, but doesn't yet, so I made that a FIXME comment on the test for PR24942:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24942
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24677
llvm-svn: 281777
This matches bfd behavior. It also makes future changes simpler as we
don't have to worry about ignoring these commands in multiple places
llvm-svn: 281775
gcc and clang in gcc compatibility mode do not accept __forceinline. Use
the gcc attribute for them instead.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24678
llvm-svn: 281766