Summary:
Before this change we seemed to not be running the unit tests, and therefore we
set out to run them. In the process of making this happen we found a divergence
between the implementation and the tests.
This includes changes to both the CMake files as well as the implementation and
headers of the XRay runtime. We've also updated documentation on the changed
functions.
Reviewers: kpw, eizan
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37290
llvm-svn: 312202
into a function.
Most CMake configuration under compiler-rt/lib/*/tests have
almost-the-same-but-not-quite functions of the form add_X_[unit]tests
for compiling and running the tests.
Much of the logic is duplicated with minor variations across different
sub-folders.
This can harm productivity for multiple reasons:
For newcomers, resulting CMake files are very large, hard to understand,
and hide the intention of the code.
Changes for enabling certain architectures end up being unnecessarily
large, as they get duplicated across multiple folders.
Adding new sub-projects requires more effort than it should, as a
developer has to again copy-n-paste the configuration, and it's not even
clear from which sub-project it should be copy-n-pasted.
With this change the logic of compile-and-generate-a-set-of-tests is
extracted into a function, which hopefully makes writing and reading
CMake much easier.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36116
llvm-svn: 310971
Currently there's a large amount of CMake logic duplication for
compiling sanitizer tests.
If we add more sanitizers, the duplication will get even worse.
This change factors out common compilation commands into a macro
available to all sanitizers.
llvm-svn: 309405
Summary:
We can move this functionality into LLVM's tools instead, as it no
longer is strictly required for the compiler-rt testing infrastructure.
It also is blocking the successful bootstrapping of the clang compiler
due to a missing virtual destructor in one of the flag parsing library.
Since this binary isn't critical for the XRay runtime testing effort
anymore (yet), we remove it in the meantime with the hope of moving the
functionality in LLVM proper instead.
Reviewers: kpw, pelikan, rnk, seurer, eugenis
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31926
llvm-svn: 299916
Instead of std::atomic APIs for atomic operations, we instead use APIs
include with sanitizer_common. This allows us to, at runtime, not have
to depend on potentially dynamically provided implementations of these
atomic operations.
Fixes http://llvm.org/PR32274.
llvm-svn: 298833
Summary:
Depending on C++11 <system_error> introduces a link-time requirement to
C++11 symbols. Removing it allows us to depend on header-only C++11 and
up libraries.
Partially fixes http://llvm.org/PR32274 -- we know there's more invasive work
to be done, but we're doing it incrementally.
Reviewers: dblaikie, kpw, pelikan
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31233
llvm-svn: 298480
Summary:
Separated the IO and the thread local storage state machine of logging
from the writing of log records once the contents are deterministic.
Finer granularity functions are provided as inline functions in the same
header such that stack does not grow due to the functions being separated.
An executable utility xray_fdr_log_printer is also implemented to use the
finest granularity functions to produce binary test data in the FDR format
with a relatively convenient text input.
For example, one can take a file with textual contents layed out in rows
and feed it to the binary to generate data that llvm-xray convert can then
read. This is a convenient way to build a test suite for llvm-xray convert
to ensure it's robust to the fdr format.
Example:
$cat myFile.txt
NewBuffer : { time = 2 , Tid=5}
NewCPU : { CPU =1 , TSC = 123}
Function : { FuncId = 5, TSCDelta = 3, EntryType = Entry }
Function : { FuncId = 5, TSCDelta = 5, EntryType = Exit}
TSCWrap : { TSC = 678 }
Function : { FuncId = 6, TSCDelta = 0, EntryType = Entry }
Function : { FuncId = 6, TSCDelta = 50, EntryType = Exit }
EOB : { }
$cat myFile.txt | ./bin/xray_fdr_log_printer > /tmp/binarydata.bin
$./bin/llvm-xray convert -output-format=yaml -output=- /tmp/binarydata.bin
yaml format comes out as expected.
Reviewers: dberris, pelikan
Reviewed By: dberris
Subscribers: llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30850
llvm-svn: 297801
Summary:
As pointed out in casual reading of the XRay codebase, that we had
some interesting named functions that didn't quite follow the LLVM coding
conventions.
Reviewers: chandlerc, dblaikie
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29625
llvm-svn: 294373
Summary:
In this change we introduce the notion of a "flight data recorder" mode
for XRay logging, where XRay logs in-memory first, and write out data
on-demand as required (as opposed to the naive implementation that keeps
logging while tracing is "on"). This depends on D26232 where we
implement the core data structure for holding the buffers that threads
will be using to write out records of operation.
This implementation only currently works on x86_64 and depends heavily
on the TSC math to write out smaller records to the inmemory buffers.
Also, this implementation defines two different kinds of records with
different sizes (compared to the current naive implementation): a
MetadataRecord (16 bytes) and a FunctionRecord (8 bytes). MetadataRecord
entries are meant to write out information like the thread ID for which
the metadata record is defined for, whether the execution of a thread
moved to a different CPU, etc. while a FunctionRecord represents the
different kinds of function call entry/exit records we might encounter
in the course of a thread's execution along with a delta from the last
time the logging handler was called.
While this implementation is not exactly what is described in the
original XRay whitepaper, this one gives us an initial implementation
that we can iterate and build upon.
Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
llvm-svn: 293015
Summary:
In this change we introduce the notion of a "flight data recorder" mode
for XRay logging, where XRay logs in-memory first, and write out data
on-demand as required (as opposed to the naive implementation that keeps
logging while tracing is "on"). This depends on D26232 where we
implement the core data structure for holding the buffers that threads
will be using to write out records of operation.
This implementation only currently works on x86_64 and depends heavily
on the TSC math to write out smaller records to the inmemory buffers.
Also, this implementation defines two different kinds of records with
different sizes (compared to the current naive implementation): a
MetadataRecord (16 bytes) and a FunctionRecord (8 bytes). MetadataRecord
entries are meant to write out information like the thread ID for which
the metadata record is defined for, whether the execution of a thread
moved to a different CPU, etc. while a FunctionRecord represents the
different kinds of function call entry/exit records we might encounter
in the course of a thread's execution along with a delta from the last
time the logging handler was called.
While this implementation is not exactly what is described in the
original XRay whitepaper, this one gives us an initial implementation
that we can iterate and build upon.
Reviewers: echristo, rSerge, majnemer
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, llvm-commits, mgorny
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27038
llvm-svn: 290852
Summary:
This should improve the error messages generated providing a bit more
information when the failures are printed out. One example of a
contrived error looks like:
```
Expected: (Buffers.getBuffer(Buf)) != (std::error_code()), actual:
system:0 vs system:0
```
Because we're using error codes, the default printing gets us more
useful information in case of failure.
This is a follow-up on D26232.
Reviewers: rSerge
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27495
llvm-svn: 289501
As constructed before this patch, in case we run into case where we
don't actually build the XRay library, we really ought to not be adding
the unit test runs. This should fix the bootstrap build failures.
This is a follow-up further to D26232.
llvm-svn: 288788
This implements a simple buffer queue to manage a pre-allocated queue of
fixed-sized buffers to hold XRay records. We need this to support
Flight Data Recorder (FDR) mode. We also implement this as a sub-library
first to allow for development before actually using it in an
implementation.
Some important properties of the buffer queue:
- Thread-safe enqueueing/dequeueing of fixed-size buffers.
- Pre-allocation of buffers at construction.
This is a re-roll of the previous attempt to submit, because it caused
failures in arm and aarch64.
Reviewers: majnemer, echristo, rSerge
Subscribers: tberghammer, danalbert, srhines, modocache, mehdi_amini, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26232
llvm-svn: 288775
Summary:
This implements a simple buffer queue to manage a pre-allocated queue of
fixed-sized buffers to hold XRay records. We need this to support
Flight Data Recorder (FDR) mode. We also implement this as a sub-library
first to allow for development before actually using it in an
implementation.
Some important properties of the buffer queue:
- Thread-safe enqueueing/dequeueing of fixed-size buffers.
- Pre-allocation of buffers at construction.
Reviewers: majnemer, rSerge, echristo
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mgorny, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26232
llvm-svn: 287910
Dean Michael Berris