D73303 was failing on Fedora Linux and so it was disabled by Skip the
AssertFrameRecognizer test for Linux.
I find no easy way how to find out if it gets recognized as
`__assert_fail` or `__GI___assert_fail` as during `Process` ctor
libc.so.6 is not yet loaded by the debuggee.
DWARF symbol `__GI___assert_fail` overrides the ELF symbol `__assert_fail`.
While external debug info (=DWARF) gets disabled for testsuite (D55859)
that sure does not apply for real world usage.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74252
One way to register a recognizer is to use RegularExpressionSP for the
module and symbol.
In order to match a symbol regardless of the module, the recognizer can
be registered with a nullptr for the module. However, this cause the
frame recognizer list command to crash because it calls
RegularExpression::GetText without checking if the shared pointer is valid.
This patch adds checks for the symbol and module RegularExpressionSP.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74212
Signed-off-by: Med Ismail Bennani <medismail.bennani@gmail.com>
Summary:
lldb-forward.h is convenient in many ways, but having clang-based
class forward declarations in there makes it easy to proliferate uses of clang
outside of plugins. Removing them makes you much more conscious of when
you're using something from clang and marks where we're using things
from clang in non-plugins.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73935
DataExtractor::GetMaxS64Bitfield performs a shift with UB in order to
construct a bitmask when bitfield_bit_size is 64. The current
implementation actually does “work” in this case, because the assumption
that the shift result is 0 holds, and 0 minus 1 gives the all-ones value
(the correct mask). However, the more readable/maintainable approach
might be to use an off-the-shelf UB-free helper.
Fixes a UBSan issue:
"col" : 37,
"description" : "invalid-shift-exponent",
"filename" : "/Users/vsk/src/llvm-project-master/lldb/source/Utility/DataExtractor.cpp",
"instrumentation_class" : "UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer",
"line" : 615,
"memory_address" : 0,
"summary" : "Shift exponent 64 is too large for 64-bit type 'uint64_t' (aka 'unsigned long long')",
rdar://59117758
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73913
Summary:
This change represents the move of ClangASTImporter, ClangASTMetadata,
ClangExternalASTSourceCallbacks, ClangUtil, CxxModuleHandler, and
TypeSystemClang from lldbSource to lldbPluginExpressionParserClang.h
This explicitly removes knowledge of clang internals from lldbSymbol,
moving towards a more generic core implementation of lldb.
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, davide, aprantl, teemperor, clayborg, labath, jingham, shafik
Subscribers: emaste, mgorny, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73661
Use the std::string conversion operator introduced in
d7049213d0. The SmallString in the log
statement doesn't require conversion at all when using the variadic log
macro.
Summary:
I noticed this strange line in `ASTImporterDelegate::ImportDefinitionTo` which doesn't make a lot of sense:
```
to_tag->setCompleteDefinition(from_tag->isCompleteDefinition());
```
It forcibly sets the imported TagDecl to be defined if the source TagDecl was defined. This doesn't make any
sense as in this code we already forced the ASTImporter to import the definition so this should always be
a no-op.
Turns out this is hiding two bugs:
1. The way we handle forward declarations in the debug info that might be completed later is that we
import them and then mark them as having external lexical storage. This makes Clang ask for the definition
later when it needs it (at which point we hopefully have the definition around and can complete it). However,
this is currently not completing the forward decls with external storage but instead creates a duplicated decl
in the target AST which is then defined. The forward decl is kept incomplete after the import and we just
forcibly make it a definition of the record without any content with our workaround. The TestSharedLib* tests
is only passing because of this.
2. Minimal import of lambdas is broken and never imports the definition it seems. That appears to be a bug
in the ASTImporter which gives the definition of lambda's some special treatment. TestLambdas.py is actually
broken but is passing because of this workaround.
This patch fixes the first bug by forcing the ASTImporter to import to the target forward declaration. We can't
delete the workaround as the second bug is still around but that will be a follow up review for the ASTImporter.
However it will get rid of all the duplicated RecordDecls that are in our expression AST that are strangely defined
but don't have any of the fields they are supposed to have.
Reviewers: shafik, labath
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: aprantl, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73345
This has the same behavior as converting std::string_view to
std::string. This is an expensive conversion, so explicit conversions
are helpful for avoiding unneccessary string copies.
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
The GetRawLine currently returns the full command line used
to create the CompletionRequest. So for example for "foo b[tab] --arg"
it would return the whole string instead of "foo b". Usually
completion code makes the wrong assumption that the cursor is at
the end of the line and handing out the complete line will cause
that people implement completions that also make this assumption.
This patch makes GetRawLine() return only the string until the
cursor and hides the suffix (so that the cursor is always at the
end of this string) and adds another function GetRawLineWithUnusedSuffix
that is specifically the line with the suffix that isn't used by
the CompletionRequest for argument parsing etc.
There is only one user of this new function that actually needs the
suffix and that is the expression command which needs the suffix to
detect if it is in the raw or argument part of the command (by looking
at the "--" separator).
Summary:
A *.cpp file header in LLDB (and in LLDB) should like this:
```
//===-- TestUtilities.cpp -------------------------------------------------===//
```
However in LLDB most of our source files have arbitrary changes to this format and
these changes are spreading through LLDB as folks usually just use the existing
source files as templates for their new files (most notably the unnecessary
editor language indicator `-*- C++ -*-` is spreading and in every review
someone is pointing out that this is wrong, resulting in people pointing out that this
is done in the same way in other files).
This patch removes most of these inconsistencies including the editor language indicators,
all the different missing/additional '-' characters, files that center the file name, missing
trailing `===//` (mostly caused by clang-format breaking the line).
Reviewers: aprantl, espindola, jfb, shafik, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere
Subscribers: dexonsmith, wuzish, emaste, sdardis, nemanjai, kbarton, MaskRay, atanasyan, arphaman, jfb, abidh, jsji, JDevlieghere, usaxena95, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73258
Summary:
This commit renames ClangASTContext to TypeSystemClang to better reflect what this class is actually supposed to do
(implement the TypeSystem interface for Clang). It also gets rid of the very confusing situation that we have both a
`clang::ASTContext` and a `ClangASTContext` in clang (which sometimes causes Clang people to think I'm fiddling
with Clang's ASTContext when I'm actually just doing LLDB work).
I also have plans to potentially have multiple clang::ASTContext instances associated with one ClangASTContext so
the ASTContext naming will then become even more confusing to people.
Reviewers: #lldb, aprantl, shafik, clayborg, labath, JDevlieghere, davide, espindola, jdoerfert, xiaobai
Reviewed By: clayborg, labath, xiaobai
Subscribers: wuzish, emaste, nemanjai, mgorny, kbarton, MaskRay, arphaman, jfb, usaxena95, jingham, xiaobai, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72684
Summary:
I often struggle to understand what exactly LLDB is doing by looking at our expression evaluation logging as our messages look like this:
```
CompleteTagDecl[2] on (ASTContext*)0x7ff31f01d240 Completing (TagDecl*)0x7ff31f01d568 named DeclName1
```
From the log messages it's unclear what this ASTContext is. Is it the scratch context, the expression context, some decl vendor context or a context from a module?
The pointer value isn't helpful for anyone unless I'm in a debugger where I could inspect the memory at the address. But even with a debugger it's not easy to
figure out what this ASTContext is without having deeper understanding about all the different ASTContext instances in LLDB (e.g., valid SourceLocation
from the file system usually means that this is the Objective-C decl vendor, a file name from multiple expressions is probably the scratch context, etc.).
This patch adds a name field to ClangASTContext instances that we can use to store a name which can be used for logging and debugging. With this
our log messages now look like this:
```
CompleteTagDecl[2] on scratch ASTContext. Completing (TagDecl*)0x7ff31f01d568 named Foo
```
We can now also just print a ClangASTContext from the debugger and see a useful name in the `m_display_name` field, e.g.
```
m_display_name = "AST for /Users/user/test/main.o";
```
Reviewers: shafik, labath, JDevlieghere, mib
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: clayborg, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72391
Summary:
CXXRecordDecls that have a move constructor but no copy constructor need to
have their implicit copy constructor marked as deleted (see C++11 [class.copy]p7, p18)
Currently we don't do that when building an AST with ClangASTContext which causes
Sema to realise that the AST is malformed and asserting when trying to create an implicit
copy constructor for us in the expression:
```
Assertion failed: ((data().DefaultedCopyConstructorIsDeleted || needsOverloadResolutionForCopyConstructor())
&& "Copy constructor should not be deleted"), function setImplicitCopyConstructorIsDeleted, file include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h, line 828.
```
In the test case there is a class `NoCopyCstr` that should have its copy constructor marked as
deleted (as it has a move constructor). When we end up trying to tab complete in the
`IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr` constructor, Sema realises that the `IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr`
has no implicit copy constructor and tries to create one for us. It then realises that
`NoCopyCstr` also has no copy constructor it could find via lookup. However because we
haven't marked the FieldDecl as having a deleted copy constructor the
`needsOverloadResolutionForCopyConstructor()` returns false and the assert fails.
`needsOverloadResolutionForCopyConstructor()` would return true if during the time we
added the `NoCopyCstr` FieldDecl to `IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr` we would have actually marked
it as having a deleted copy constructor (which would then mark the copy constructor of
`IndirectlyDeletedCopyCstr ` as needing overload resolution and Sema is happy).
This patch sets the correct mark when we complete our CXXRecordDecls (which is the time when
we know whether a copy constructor has been declared). In theory we don't have to do this if
we had a Sema around when building our debug info AST but at the moment we don't have this
so this has to do the job for now.
Reviewers: shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72694
and document the shortcomings of LLDB's partially defined DW_OP_piece
handling.
This would manifest as "DW_OP_piece for offset foo but top of stack is
of size bar".
rdar://problem/46262998
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72880
By switching to Scalars that are backed by explicitly-sized APInts we
can avoid a bug that increases the buffer reserved for a small piece
to the next-largest host integer type.
This manifests as "DW_OP_piece for offset foo but top of stack is of size bar".
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72879
Summary:
In Debug builds we call VerifyDecl in ClangASTContext::CreateFunctionDeclaration which in turn
calls `getAccess` on the created FunctionDecl. As we passed in a RecordDecl as the DeclContext
for the FunctionDecl, we end up hitting the assert in `getAccess` that checks that we never have
a Decl inside a Record without a valid AccessSpecifier. FunctionDecls are never in RecordDecls
(that would be a CXXMethodDecl) so setting a access specifier would not be the correct way to
fix this.
Instead this patch does the same thing that DWARFASTParserClang::ParseSubroutine is doing:
We pass in the FunctionDecl with the TranslationUnit as the DeclContext. That's not ideal but
it is how we currently do it when creating our debug info AST, so the unit test should do
the same.
Reviewers: shafik
Reviewed By: shafik
Subscribers: aprantl, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72359
As suggested by @labath extended RangeDataVector so that user can provide
custom sorting of the Entry's `data' field for D63540.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D63540
RangeData functions were used just by RangeDataVector (=after I removed them
LLDB still builds fine) which no longer uses them so I removed them.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72460
Creating an ASTContext with an unknown triple is rarely a good idea (as usually
all our ASTs have a valid triple that is either from the host or the target) and the
default argument makes it far to easy to implicitly create such an AST. Let's
remove it and force people to pass a triple.
The only place where we don't pass a triple is a DWARFASTParserClangTests
where we now just pass the host triple instead (the test doesn't depend on any
triple so this shouldn't change anything).
This constructor is supposed to take a string representing an llvm::Triple.
We might as well take a llvm::Triple here which saves us all the string
conversions in the call sites and we make this more type safe.
Summary:
We currently don't set access specifiers for function template declarations. This seems to be fine
as long as the function template is not declared inside any record in which case Clang asserts
with the following once we try to query it's access:
```
Assertion failed: (Access != AS_none && "Access specifier is AS_none inside a record decl"), function AccessDeclContextSanity,
```
This patch just marks these function template declarations as public to make Clang happy.
Reviewers: shafik, teemperor
Reviewed By: teemperor
Subscribers: JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71909
This adds a check that the ClangASTContext actually fits to the
DeclContext that we want to create a CompilerDeclContext for. If
the ClangASTContext (and its associated ASTContext) does not fit
to the DeclContext (that is, the DeclContext wasn't created by the
ASTContext), all computations using this malformed CompilerDeclContext
will yield unpredictable results.
Also fixes the only place that actually hits this assert which is the
construction of a CompilerDeclContext in ClangExpressionDeclMap
where we pass an unrelated ASTContext instead of the ASTContext
of the current expression.
I had to revert my previous change to DWARFASTParserClangTests.cpp
back to using the unsafe direct construction of CompilerDeclContext
as this assert won't work if the DeclContext we pass isn't a valid
DeclContext in the first place.
Summary:
Many of our tests need to initialize certain subsystems/plugins of LLDB such as
`FileSystem` or `HostInfo` by calling their static `Initialize` functions before the
test starts and then calling `::Terminate` after the test is done (in reverse order).
This adds a lot of error-prone boilerplate code to our testing code.
This patch adds a RAII called SubsystemRAII that ensures that we always call
::Initialize and then call ::Terminate after the test is done (and that the Terminate
calls are always in the reverse order of the ::Initialize calls). It also gets rid of
all of the boilerplate that we had for these calls.
Per-fixture initialization is still not very nice with this approach as it would
require some kind of static unique_ptr that gets manually assigned/reseted
from the gtest SetUpTestCase/TearDownTestCase functions. Because of that
I changed all per-fixture setup to now do per-test setup which can be done
by just having the SubsystemRAII as a member of the test fixture. This change doesn't
influence our normal test runtime as LIT anyway runs each test case separately
(and the Initialize/Terminate calls are anyway not very expensive). It will however
make running all tests in a single executable slightly slower.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere, martong, espindola, shafik
Reviewed By: labath
Subscribers: mgorny, rnkovacs, emaste, MaskRay, abidh, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71630
The CompilerDeclContext constructor takes a void* pointer which
means that all callers of this constructor need to first explicitly
convert all pointers to clang::DeclContext*. This causes that we
for example can't just pass a TranslationUnitDecl* to the constructor without
first casting it to its parent class (as it inherits from both
Decl and DeclContext so the void* pointer is actually a Decl*).
This patch introduces a utility function in the ClangASTContext
which gets rid of the requirement to cast all pointers to
clang::DeclContext. Also moves all constructor calls to use this
function instead which is NFC (beside the change in
DWARFASTParserClangTests.cpp).
ClangASTContext::getASTContext() currently returns a ptr but we have an assert there since a
while that the ASTContext is not a nullptr. This causes that we still have a lot of code
that is doing nullptr checks on the result of getASTContext() which is all unreachable code.
This patch changes the return value to a reference to make it clear this can't be a nullptr
and deletes all the nullptr checks.
Their naming is misleading as they only return the
ClangASTContext-owned variables. For ClangASTContext instances constructed
for a given clang::ASTContext they silently generated duplicated instances
(e.g., a second IdentifierTable) that were essentially unusable.
This removes all these getters as they are anyway not very useful in comparison
to just calling the clang::ASTContext getters. The initialization
code has been moved to the CreateASTContext initialization method so that all
code for making our own clang::ASTContext is in one place.
This implements a very elementary Lua script interpreter. It supports
running a single command as well as running interactively. It uses
editline if available. It's still missing a bunch of stuff though. Some
things that I intentionally ingored for now are that I/O isn't properly
hooked up (so every print goes to stdout) and the non-editline support
which is not handling a bunch of corner cases. The latter is a matter of
reusing existing code in the Python interpreter.
Discussion on the mailing list:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/lldb-dev/2019-December/015812.html
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71234
We already pass a Decl here and the additional ASTContext needs to
match the Decl. We might as well just pass the Decl and then extract
the ASTContext from that.
This adds a unit test for looking up persistent declarations in the scratch AST
context. Also adds the `GetPersistentDecl` hook to the ClangExpressionDeclMap
that this unit test can emulate looking up persistent variables without having
a lldb_private::Target.
The ClangExpressionDeclMap should be testable from a unit test. This is currently
impossible as they have both dependencies on Target/ExecutionContext from their
constructor. This patch allows constructing these classes without an active Target
and adds the missing tests for running without a target that we can do at least
a basic lookup test without crashing.
Summary:
These types were handled in some places, but not others. This resulted
in (for example) not being able to display members of structs whose
types were defined using these constructs.
Using getLocallyUnqualifiedSingleStepDesugaredType for these types is
not fully equivalent, as it will only desugar them if the types are not
instantiation-dependent, whereas previously we did that unconditionally.
It's not clear to me which behavior is correct here, but the test suite
does not seem to care either way.
Reviewers: teemperor, shafik
Subscribers: lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D71405
Jan Kratochvil