Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Nikita Popov 110cf05203 Reapply "[DemandedBits][BDCE] Support vectors of integers"
DemandedBits and BDCE currently only support scalar integers. This
patch extends them to also handle vector integer operations. In this
case bits are not tracked for individual vector elements, instead a
bit is demanded if it is demanded for any of the elements. This matches
the behavior of computeKnownBits in ValueTracking and
SimplifyDemandedBits in InstCombine.

Unlike the previous iteration of this patch, getDemandedBits() can now
again be called on arbirary (sized) instructions, even if they don't
have integer or vector of integer type. (For vector types the size of the
returned mask will now be the scalar size in bits though.)

The added LoopVectorize test case shows a case which triggered an
assertion failure with the previous attempt, because getDemandedBits()
was called on a pointer-typed instruction.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55297

llvm-svn: 348602
2018-12-07 15:38:13 +00:00
Nikita Popov 14ca9a8355 Revert "[DemandedBits][BDCE] Support vectors of integers"
This reverts commit r348549. Causing assertion failures during
clang build.

llvm-svn: 348558
2018-12-07 00:42:03 +00:00
Nikita Popov cf65b9207b [DemandedBits][BDCE] Support vectors of integers
DemandedBits and BDCE currently only support scalar integers. This
patch extends them to also handle vector integer operations. In this
case bits are not tracked for individual vector elements, instead a
bit is demanded if it is demanded for any of the elements. This matches
the behavior of computeKnownBits in ValueTracking and
SimplifyDemandedBits in InstCombine.

The getDemandedBits() method can now only be called on instructions that
have integer or vector of integer type. Previously it could be called on
any sized instruction (even if it was not particularly useful). The size
of the return value is now always the scalar size in bits (while
previously it was the type size in bits).

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55297

llvm-svn: 348549
2018-12-06 23:50:32 +00:00
Nikita Popov f94c8f0d1b [DemandedBits] Add support for funnel shifts
Add support for funnel shifts to the DemandedBits analysis. The
demanded bits of the first two operands can be determined if the
shift amount is constant. The demanded bits of the third operand
(shift amount) can be determined if the bitwidth is a power of two.

This is basically the same functionality as implemented in D54869
and D54478, but for DemandedBits rather than InstCombine.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54876

llvm-svn: 347561
2018-11-26 15:36:57 +00:00
Benjamin Kramer 0af3be4560 Fix tests after move to utohexstr.
llvm-svn: 321527
2017-12-28 17:00:37 +00:00
Brian Gesiak 0a7894d99c [Analysis] Support bitreverse in -demanded-bits pass
Summary:
* Add a bitreverse case in the demanded bits analysis pass.
* Add tests for the bitreverse (and bswap) intrinsic in the
  demanded bits pass.
* Add a test case to the BDCE tests: that manipulations to
  high-order bits are eliminated once the bits are reversed
  and then right-shifted.

Reviewers: mkuper, jmolloy, hfinkel, trentxintong

Reviewed By: jmolloy

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31857

llvm-svn: 300215
2017-04-13 16:44:25 +00:00
Michael Kuperstein de16b44f74 Port DemandedBits to the new pass manager.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18679

llvm-svn: 266699
2016-04-18 23:55:01 +00:00
James Molloy 6e518a3b50 [DemandedBits] Revert r249687 due to PR26071
This regresses a test in LoopVectorize, so I'll need to go away and think about how to solve this in a way that isn't broken.

From the writeup in PR26071:

What's happening is that ComputeKnownZeroes is telling us that all bits except the LSB are zero. We're then deciding that only the LSB needs to be demanded from the icmp's inputs.

This is where we're wrong - we're assuming that after simplification the bits that were known zero will continue to be known zero. But they're not - during trivialization the upper bits get changed (because an XOR isn't shrunk), so the icmp fails.

The fault is in demandedbits - its contract does clearly state that a non-demanded bit may either be zero or one.

llvm-svn: 259649
2016-02-03 15:05:06 +00:00
James Molloy 121de0bcfa [DemandedBits] Fix computation of demanded bits for ICmps
The computation of ICmp demanded bits is independent of the individual operand being evaluated. We simply return a mask consisting of the minimum leading zeroes of both operands.

We were incorrectly passing "I" to ComputeKnownBits - this should be "UserI->getOperand(0)". In cases where we were evaluating the 1th operand, we were taking the minimum leading zeroes of it and itself.

This should fix PR26266.

llvm-svn: 258690
2016-01-25 14:49:36 +00:00
James Molloy e9d50dc9f7 Compute demanded bits for icmp instructions
Instead of bailing out when we see an icmp, we can instead at least
say that if the upper bits of both operands are known zero, they are
not demanded. This doesn't help with signed comparisons, but it's at
least better than bailing out.

llvm-svn: 249687
2015-10-08 12:40:06 +00:00
James Molloy bcd7f0ac98 Treat Mul just like Add and Subtract
Like adds and subtracts, muls ripple only to the left so we can use
the same logic.

While we're here, add a print method to DemandedBits so it can be used
with -analyze, which we'll use in the testcase.

llvm-svn: 249686
2015-10-08 12:39:59 +00:00