When attempting to correct a misspelled pseudo destructor call as in:
struct Foo;
void foo(Foo *p) {
p.~Foo();
}
a call is made in canRecoverDotPseudoDestructorCallsOnPointerObjects
to LookupDestructor without checking that the record has a definition.
This causes an assertion later in LookupSpecialMember which assumes that
the record has a definition.
Patch By Roman Zhikharevich!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57111
Reviewed By: riccibruno
llvm-svn: 352047
If definition of a class is unknown and out-of-line definition of its
member is encountered, do not parse the member declaration.
This change fixes PR18542.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8010
llvm-svn: 239483
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
Bruno Ricci