Commit Graph

8 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Tim Northover 0241637c0e Sema: disable implicit conversion from _Complex to real types in C++.
Converting a _Complex type to a real one simply discards the imaginary part.
This can easily lead to loss of information so for safety (and GCC
compatibility) this patch disallows that when the conversion would be implicit.

The one exception is bool, which actually compares both real and imaginary
parts and so is safe.

llvm-svn: 310427
2017-08-08 23:18:05 +00:00
Richard Smith b8a98241fc PR15966: don't get confused by a complex integer -> complex integer conversion
and misclassify it as a complex-real conversion.

llvm-svn: 181626
2013-05-10 20:29:50 +00:00
Richard Trieu 553b2b2e5d Modify how the -verify flag works. Currently, the verification string and
diagnostic message are compared.  If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given.  This gives rise to an unexpected case:

  // expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}

will match the following error messages from Clang:

  candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
  candidate function has different number of parameters

It will also match these other error messages:

  candidate function
  function has different number of parameters
  number of parameters

This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting.  Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected.  Some stats from this cleanup:

87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)

llvm-svn: 146619
2011-12-15 00:38:15 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 8fa1e7eec4 Add a new conversion rank to classify conversions between complex and scalar
types. Rank these conversions below other conversions. This allows overload
resolution when the only distinction is between a complex and scalar type. It
also brings the complex overload resolutin in line with GCC's.

llvm-svn: 97128
2010-02-25 07:20:54 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar 8fbe78f6fc Update tests to use %clang_cc1 instead of 'clang-cc' or 'clang -cc1'.
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
   which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
   can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
   a default target).

llvm-svn: 91446
2009-12-15 20:14:24 +00:00
Daniel Dunbar a45cf5b6b0 Rename clang to clang-cc.
Tests and drivers updated, still need to shuffle dirs.

llvm-svn: 67602
2009-03-24 02:24:46 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 6752502b81 Expand the definition of a complex promotion to include complex ->
complex conversions where the conversion between the real types is an
integral promotion. This is how G++ handles complex promotions for its
complex integer extension.

llvm-svn: 64344
2009-02-12 00:26:06 +00:00
Douglas Gregor 78ca74d81d Introduce _Complex conversions into the function overloading
system. Since C99 doesn't have overloading and C++ doesn't have
_Complex, there is no specification for    this. Here's what I think
makes sense.

Complex conversions come in several flavors:

  - Complex promotions:  a complex -> complex   conversion where the
    underlying real-type conversion is a floating-point promotion. GCC
    seems to call this a promotion, EDG does something else. This is
    given "promotion" rank for determining the best viable function.
  - Complex conversions: a complex -> complex conversion that is
    not a complex promotion. This is given "conversion" rank for
    determining the best viable   function.
  - Complex-real conversions: a real -> complex or complex -> real
    conversion. This is given "conversion" rank for determining the
    best viable function.

These rules are the same for C99 (when using the "overloadable"
attribute) and C++. However, there is one difference in the handling
of floating-point promotions: in C99, float -> long double and double
-> long double are considered promotions (so we give them "promotion" 
rank), while C++ considers these conversions ("conversion" rank).

llvm-svn: 64343
2009-02-12 00:15:05 +00:00