MethodVFTableLocations in MigrosoftVTableContext contains canonicalized
decl. But, it's sometimes asked to lookup for non-canonicalized decl,
and that causes assertion failure, and compilation failure.
Fixes PR37481.
Patch by Taiju Tsuiki!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46929
llvm-svn: 332639
This is similar to the LLVM change https://reviews.llvm.org/D46290.
We've been running doxygen with the autobrief option for a couple of
years now. This makes the \brief markers into our comments
redundant. Since they are a visual distraction and we don't want to
encourage more \brief markers in new code either, this patch removes
them all.
Patch produced by
for i in $(git grep -l '\@brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\@brief //g' $i & done
for i in $(git grep -l '\\brief'); do perl -pi -e 's/\\brief //g' $i & done
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46320
llvm-svn: 331834
Found via codespell -q 3 -I ../clang-whitelist.txt
Where whitelist consists of:
archtype
cas
classs
checkk
compres
definit
frome
iff
inteval
ith
lod
methode
nd
optin
ot
pres
statics
te
thru
Patch by luzpaz! (This is a subset of D44188 that applies cleanly with a few
files that have dubious fixes reverted.)
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44188
llvm-svn: 329399
This re-lands r328845 with fixes for crbug.com/827810.
The initial motiviation was to hoist MethodVFTableLocation to global
scope so it could be forward declared.
In this patch, I noticed that MicrosoftVTableContext uses some risky
patterns. It has methods that return references to data stored in
DenseMaps. I've made some of them return by value for trivial structs
and I've moved some things into separate allocations.
llvm-svn: 329007
This allows forward declaring it so that we can add it to
MicrosoftMangleContext::mangleVirtualMemPtrThunk without including
VTableBuilder.h. That saves a hashtable lookup when emitting virtual
member pointer functions.
It also shortens a really long type name. This struct has "VFtable" in
the name, so it seems pretty unlikely that someone will assume it is
generally useful for non-MS C++ ABI stuff.
llvm-svn: 328845
We were assuming that vbtable indices were assigned in layout order in
our comparison, which is not the case. When a virtual method, such as
the destructor, appears in multiple vftables, the vftable that appears
first in object layout order is the one that points to the main
implementation of that method. The later vftables use thunks.
In this layout, we adjusted "this" in the main implementation by the
amount that is appropriate for 'B' instead of 'A', even though the main
implementation is found in D's vftable for A:
struct A {
virtual ~A() {}
};
struct B {
virtual ~B() {}
};
struct C : virtual B {};
struct D : virtual A, C {};
D's layout looks like:
0 D subobject (empty)
0 C base suboject
8 A base subobject
16 B base subobject
With this fix, we correctly adjust by -8 in D's deleting destructor
instead of -16.
Fixes PR36921.
llvm-svn: 328723
r327219 added wrappers to std::sort which randomly shuffle the container before
sorting. This will help in uncovering non-determinism caused due to undefined
sorting order of objects having the same key.
To make use of that infrastructure we need to invoke llvm::sort instead of
std::sort.
llvm-svn: 328636
Overriding a method from a virtual base with a covariant return type
consumes a slot from the vftable in the virtual base. This can make it
impossible to implement certain diamond inheritance hierarchies, but we
have to follow along for compatibility in the simple cases.
This patch only affects our vtable dumper and member pointer function
mangling, since all other callers of getMethodVFTableLocation seem to
recompute VBTableIndex instead of using the one in the method location.
Patch by David Majnemer
llvm-svn: 312017
In a future change, this representation will allow us to use the new inrange
annotation on getelementptr to allow the optimizer to split vtable groups.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22296
llvm-svn: 289584
'ReusingBase' was a terrible name. It might actually refer to the most
derived class, which is not a base. 'BaseWithVPtr' was also bad, since
again, it could refer to the most derived class. It was actually the
first base to introduce the vptr, so now it is 'IntroducingObject'.
llvm-svn: 276120
Reverts r273305 and re-instates r273296.
We needed to fix a bug in Sema::MarkVTableUsed to ensure that operator
delete lookup occurs when the vtable is referenced. We already had a
special case to look up operator delete when dllimport was used, but I
think should really mark virtual destructors referenced any time the
vtable is used.
llvm-svn: 274147
MSVC doesn't provide them. PR28223
I left behind the machinery in case we want to resurrect available_externally
vftable emission to support devirtualization.
Reviewers: majnemer
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21544
llvm-svn: 273296
This reverts commit r260449.
We would supress our emission of vftable definitions if we thought
another translation unit would provide the definition because we saw an
explicit instantiation declaration. This is not the case with
dllimport, we want to synthesize a definition of the vftable regardless.
This fixes PR26569.
llvm-svn: 260548
Referencing a dllimported vtable is impossible in a constexpr
constructor. It would be friendlier to C++ programmers if we
synthesized a copy of the vftable which referenced imported virtual
functions. This would let us initialize the object in a way which
preserves both the intent to import functionality from another DLL while
also making constexpr work.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17061
llvm-svn: 260388
In the Microsoft ABI, the vftable is laid out in the order in the
declaration order of the entities defined within it.
Obviously, only virtual methods end up in the vftable but they will be
placed into the table at the same position as the first entity with the
same name.
llvm-svn: 253523
Summary: It breaks the build for the ASTMatchers
Subscribers: klimek, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13893
llvm-svn: 250827
This lets us pass functors (and lambdas) without void * tricks. On the
downside we can't pass CXXRecordDecl's Find* members (which are now type
safe) to lookupInBases directly, but a lambda trampoline is a small
price to pay. No functionality change intended.
llvm-svn: 243217
The patch is generated using this command:
$ tools/extra/clang-tidy/tool/run-clang-tidy.py -fix \
-checks=-*,llvm-namespace-comment -header-filter='llvm/.*|clang/.*' \
work/llvm/tools/clang
To reduce churn, not touching namespaces spanning less than 10 lines.
llvm-svn: 240270
Handle some common cases quickly when deeper introspection into the path
has no effect on the final result.
No functional change intended.
llvm-svn: 236475
I discovered a case where the old algorithm would crash. Instead of
trying to patch the algorithm, rewrite it. The new algorithm operates
in three phases:
1. Find all paths to the subobject with the vptr.
2. Remove paths which are subsets of other paths.
3. Select the best path where 'best' is defined as introducing the most
covariant overriders. If two paths introduce different overriders,
raise a diagnostic.
llvm-svn: 236444
The MSVC ABI has a bug introduced by appending to the end of vftables
which come from virtual bases: covariant thunks introduces via
non-overlapping regions of the inheritance lattice both append to the
same slot in the vftable.
It is possible to generate correct vftables in cases where one node in
the lattice completely dominates the other on the way to the base with
the vfptr; in all other cases, we must raise a diagnostic in order to
prevent the illusion that we succeeded in laying out the vftable.
This fixes PR16759.
llvm-svn: 236354
A class might contain multiple ways of getting to a vbase, some of which
are virtual and other non-virtual. It may be the case that a
non-virtual base contains an override of a method in a vbase. This
means that we must carefully pick between a set of nvbases to determine
which is the best.
As a consequence, the findPathForVPtr algorithm is considerably simpler.
llvm-svn: 236353
There can be multiple virtual bases which are on the path to a vfptr
when one vbase virtually inherits from another. We should prefer the
most derived virtual base which covariantly overrides a method in the
vfptr class; if we do not lengthen the path this way, we will end up
with too few vftable entries.
This fixes PR21073.
llvm-svn: 236239
This was a bug in r218285 that prevented us from seeing subsequent
virtual bases in the class hierarchy, leading to crashes later.
Also add some comments to this function, now that we better understand
what it's trying to do.
Fixes PR21062 and PR21064.
llvm-svn: 235899
There will be an explicit template instantiation in another translation
unit which will provide the definition of the VF/VB-Tables.
This fixes PR22932.
llvm-svn: 232680
Fangrui Song