Summary: Pretty much everything we need is in llvm::TargetMachine.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: llvm-commits, tschuett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48428
llvm-svn: 335237
Summary: Introducing a Prototype object to capture Variables that must be set but keeps degrees of freedom as Invalid. This allows exploring non constraint variables later on.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48316
llvm-svn: 335105
Summary: This is a step towards implementing memory operands and X87.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48210
llvm-svn: 335038
Summary:
On hover, the whole asm snippet is displayed, including operands.
This requires the actual assembly output instead of just the MCInsts:
This is because some pseudo-instructions get lowered to actual target
instructions during codegen (e.g. ABS_Fp32 -> SSE or X87).
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48164
llvm-svn: 334805
Summary:
Get rid of OpcodeName.
To remove the opcode name from an old file:
```
cat old_file | sed '/opcode_name.*/d'
```
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48121
llvm-svn: 334691
Summary: Previous design was relying on the 'mutate' keyword and was quite confusing. This version separate mutable from immutable data and makes it clearer what changes and what doesn't.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48020
llvm-svn: 334596
Summary: This patch moves linking of libpfm from different places to a single one.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: mgorny, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48075
llvm-svn: 334499
This breaks the OpenFlags enumeration into two separate
enumerations: OpenFlags and CreationDisposition. The first
controls the behavior of the API depending on whether or not
the target file already exists, and is not a flags-based
enum. The second controls more flags-like values.
This yields a more easy to understand API, while also allowing
flags to be passed to the openForRead api, where most of the
values didn't make sense before. This also makes the apis more
testable as it becomes easy to enumerate all the configurations
which make sense, so I've added many new tests to exercise all
the different values.
llvm-svn: 334221
Summary: BenchmarkRunner subclasses can now create many configurations - although this patch still generates one.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47877
llvm-svn: 334197
Summary: This is the first step to have the BenchmarkRunner create and measure many different configurations (different initial values for instance).
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47826
llvm-svn: 334169
Summary: BenchmarkResult IO functions now return an Error or Expected so caller can deal take proper action.
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47868
llvm-svn: 334167
Moves the Mode field out of the Key. The existing yaml benchmark results can be fixed with the following script:
```
readonly FILE=$1
readonly MODE=latency # Change to uops to fix a uops benchmark.
cat $FILE | \
sed "/^\ \+mode:\ \+$MODE$/d" | \
sed "/^cpu_name.*$/i mode: $MODE"
```
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47813
Authored by: Guillaume Chatelet
llvm-svn: 334079
We want llvm-exegesis to explore instructions (effect of initial register values, effect of operand selection). To enable this a BenchmarkResult muststore all the relevant data in its key. This patch starts adding such data. Here we simply allow to store the generated instructions, following patches will add operands and initial values for registers.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D47764
Authored by: Guilluame Chatelet
llvm-svn: 334008
Summary:
We now highlight any sched classes whose measurements do not match the
LLVM SchedModel. "bad" clusters are marked in red.
Screenshot in phabricator diff.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, mgrang, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47639
llvm-svn: 333884
Summary:
I'm slowly looking into a new X86 scheduler model,
for AMD Bulldozer CPU, model 2 (bdver2, Piledriver).
And naturally, i have hit that assert :)
I happened to know what it meant, and how to fix it,
but that is not too common knowledge.
Reviewers: courbet, RKSimon
Reviewed By: courbet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits, craig.topper
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47572
llvm-svn: 333632
Summary: This makes the report much more readable.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, mgrang, craig.topper, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47189
llvm-svn: 332979
Summary:
Warn on instructions that should have the same performance
characteristics according to the sched model but actually
differ in their benchmarks.
Next step: Make the display nicer to browse, I was thinking maybe html.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46945
llvm-svn: 332601
Restructuring the code to measure latency and uops.
The end goal is to have this program spawn another process to deal with SIGILL and other malformed programs. It is not yet the case in this redesign, it is still the main program that runs the code (and may crash).
It now uses BitVector instead of Graph for performance reasons.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46821
(with fixed ARM tests)
Authored by Guillaume Chatelet
llvm-svn: 332592
Restructuring the code to measure latency and uops.
The end goal is to have this program spawn another process to deal with SIGILL and other malformed programs. It is not yet the case in this redesign, it is still the main program that runs the code (and may crash).
It now uses BitVector instead of Graph for performance reasons.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D46821
Authored by Guillaume Chatelet
llvm-svn: 332579
Summary:
AsmTemplate becomes IntructionBenchmarkKey, which has three components.
This allows retreiving the opcode for analysis.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46873
llvm-svn: 332348
Summary:
The analysis mode gives the user a clustered view of the measurement results.
Next steps are (requires the split ok AsmTemplate.Name into {mnemonic, mode}):
- Show the sched class.
- Highlight any inconsistencies with the checked-in data.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits, tschuett
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46865
llvm-svn: 332344
Summary: Arm does not have a ret code per se.
Reviewers: gchatelet
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, kristof.beyls, tschuett, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45672
llvm-svn: 332331
comparison of integers of different signs: 'const unsigned long' and 'const int' [-Werror,-Wsign-compare]
unittests/tools/llvm-exegesis/BenchmarkResultTest.cpp:60:5: note: in instantiation of function template specialization 'testing::internal::EqHelper<false>::Compare<unsigned long, int>' requested here
ASSERT_EQ(FromDiskVector.size(), 1);
llvm-svn: 332230
The analysis mode gives the user a clustered view of the measurement results and
highlights any inconsistencies with the checked-in data.
llvm-svn: 332229
Summary:
Subtargets can define the libpfm counter names that can be used to
measure cycles and uops issued on ProcResUnits.
This allows making llvm-exegesis available on more targets.
Fixes PR36984.
Reviewers: gchatelet, RKSimon, andreadb, craig.topper
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45360
llvm-svn: 329675
Summary:
[llvm-exegesis][RFC] Automatic Measurement of Instruction Latency/Uops
This is the code corresponding to the RFC "llvm-exegesis Automatic Measurement of Instruction Latency/Uops".
The RFC is available on the LLVM mailing lists as well as the following document
for easier reading:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1QidaJMJUyQdRrFKD66vE1_N55whe0coQ3h1GpFzz27M/edit?usp=sharing
Subscribers: mgorny, gchatelet, orwant, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44519
llvm-svn: 329156