Commit 6bc1e69de2 changed the search string
to also check for the generated strings that surround the plain assert:
Assertion `false && "lldb-test assert"' failed
^^^^^^^^^
This causes the test to fail on setups where the generated assert message
looks different. E.g., on macOS the generated message looks like this:
Assertion failed: (false && "lldb_assert failed"), function lldb_assert
This reverts the old behaviour of just checking for the actual string we
have inside LLDB.
LLDB on Linux built with symbols is showing this error.
Without symbols it still PASSes:
lldb-test: .../lldb/source/Utility/LLDBAssert.cpp:29: void lldb_private::lldb_assert(bool, const char *, const char *, const char *, unsigned int): Assertion `false && "lldb_assert failed"' failed.
With symbols it FAILs:
lldb-test: .../lldb/tools/lldb-test/lldb-test.cpp:1086: int opts::assert::lldb_assert(lldb_private::Debugger &): Assertion `false && "lldb-test assert"' failed.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D99462
Call `os_log_fault` when an lldb assert fails. We piggyback off
`LLVM_SUPPORT_XCODE_SIGNPOSTS`, which also depends on `os_log`, to avoid
having to introduce another CMake check and corresponding define.
This patch also adds a small test using lldb-test that verifies we abort
with a "regular" assertion when asserts are enabled.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D98987
Raphael Isemann