This was previously done in some places, but for example not for
bundling so that single object compilation with -c failed. In
addition cubin was used for all file types during unbundling which
is incorrect for assembly files that are passed to ptxas.
Tighten up the tests so that we can't regress in that area.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D40250
llvm-svn: 318763
Summary:
CUDA doesn't support errno at all, so this is the right thing -- or at
least, in the right direction.
But also, this unbreaks the CUDA test-suite math tests [0] after D39481.
__cuda_cmath.h forwards nexttoward() to __builtin_nexttoward, which,
after that patch, was lowering to a libcall that doesn't exist in NVPTX.
[0] http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cuda-build/builds/14999
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: sanjoy, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39586
llvm-svn: 317297
Summary:
CUDA 9's minimum sm is sm_30.
Ideally we should also make sm_30 the default when compiling with CUDA
9, but that seems harder than it should be.
Subscribers: sanjoy
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39109
llvm-svn: 316611
For the shuffle instructions in reductions we need at least sm_30
but the user may want to customize the default architecture.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38883
llvm-svn: 315996
Create a separate test file to contain all tests for OpenMP
offloading to GPUs.
Make libdevice checking more robust by accounting for
the case in which no libdevice is found.
This changes are in connrection with diff: D29660
llvm-svn: 310718
The commit r310291 introduced the failure. r310332 was a test fix commit and
r310300 was a followup commit. I reverted these two to avoid merge conflicts
when reverting.
The 'openmp-offload.c' test is failing on Darwin because the following
run lines:
// RUN: touch %t1.o
// RUN: touch %t2.o
// RUN: %clang -### -no-canonical-prefixes -fopenmp=libomp -fopenmp-targets=nvptx64-nvidia-cuda -save-temps -no-canonical-prefixes %t1.o %t2.o 2>&1 \
// RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=CHK-TWOCUBIN %s
trigger the following assertion:
Driver.cpp:3418:
assert(CachedResults.find(ActionTC) != CachedResults.end() &&
"Result does not exist??");
llvm-svn: 310345
Summary: Pass the type of the device offloading when building the tool chain for a particular target architecture. This is required when supporting multiple tool chains that target a single device type. In our particular use case, the OpenMP and CUDA tool chains will use the same ```addClangTargetOptions ``` method. This enables the reuse of common options and ensures control over options only supported by a particular tool chain.
Reviewers: arpith-jacob, caomhin, carlo.bertolli, ABataev, jlebar, hfinkel, tstellar, Hahnfeld
Reviewed By: hfinkel
Subscribers: jgravelle-google, aheejin, rengolin, jfb, dschuff, sbc100, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D29647
llvm-svn: 307272
Summary:
(This is a move-only refactoring patch. There are no functionality changes.)
This patch splits apart the Clang driver's tool and toolchain implementation
files. Each target platform toolchain is moved to its own file, along with the
closest-related tools. Each target platform toolchain has separate headers and
implementation files, so the hierarchy of classes is unchanged.
There are some remaining shared free functions, mostly from Tools.cpp. Several
of these move to their own architecture-specific files, similar to r296056. Some
of them are only used by a single target platform; since the tools and
toolchains are now together, some helpers now live in a platform-specific file.
The balance are helpers related to manipulating argument lists, so they are now
in a new file pair, CommonArgs.h and .cpp.
I've tried to cluster the code logically, which is fairly straightforward for
most of the target platforms and shared architectures. I think I've made
reasonable choices for these, as well as the various shared helpers; but of
course, I'm happy to hear feedback in the review.
There are some particular things I don't like about this patch, but haven't been
able to find a better overall solution. The first is the proliferation of files:
there are several files that are tiny because the toolchain is not very
different from its base (usually the Gnu tools/toolchain). I think this is
mostly a reflection of the true complexity, though, so it may not be "fixable"
in any reasonable sense. The second thing I don't like are the includes like
"../Something.h". I've avoided this largely by clustering into the current file
structure. However, a few of these includes remain, and in those cases it
doesn't make sense to me to sink an existing file any deeper.
Reviewers: rsmith, mehdi_amini, compnerd, rnk, javed.absar
Subscribers: emaste, jfb, danalbert, srhines, dschuff, jyknight, nemanjai, nhaehnle, mgorny, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30372
llvm-svn: 297250
Jonas Hahnfeld