Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet, jmolloy
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: jmolloy, spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 314886
Summary:
Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the
debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger.
This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment
expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer
value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent
the memory address order.
I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF
pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed.
Original patch was reverted due to using -stop-after=isel in
the test case (but that is only working when AMDGPU target
is included in the llc build). The test case has now been
updated to use -stop-before=expand-isel-pseudos instead.
Patch by: dstenb
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172
llvm-svn: 314781
This adds some more debug messages to the type legalizer and functions
like PromoteNode, ExpandNode, ExpandLibCall in an attempt to make
the debug messages a little bit more informative and useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38450
llvm-svn: 314773
Summary:
Take the target's endianness into account when splitting the
debug information in DAGTypeLegalizer::SetExpandedInteger.
This patch fixes so that, for big-endian targets, the fragment
expression corresponding to the high part of a split integer
value is placed at offset 0, in order to correctly represent
the memory address order.
I have attached a PPC32 reproducer where the resulting DWARF
pieces for a 64-bit integer were incorrectly reversed.
Patch by: dstenb
Reviewers: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Reviewed By: JDevlieghere, aprantl, dblaikie
Subscribers: nemanjai
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38172
llvm-svn: 314666
Currently expandUnalignedLoad/Store uses place holder pointer info for temporary memory operand
in stack, which does not have correct address space. This causes unaligned private double16 load/store to be
lowered to flat_load instead of buffer_load for amdgcn target.
This fixes failures of OpenCL conformance test basic/vload_private/vstore_private on target amdgcn---amdgizcl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35361
llvm-svn: 314566
Without this, we could end up trying to get the Nth (0-indexed) element
from a subvector of size N.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37880
llvm-svn: 314380
This teach simplifyDemandedBits to handle constant splat vector shifts.
This required changing some uses of getZExtValue to getLimitedValue since we can't rely on legalization using getShiftAmountTy for the shift amount.
I believe there may have been a bug in the ((X << C1) >>u ShAmt) handling where we didn't check if the inner shift was too large. I've fixed that here.
I had to add new patterns to ARM because the zext/sext the patterns were trying to look for got turned into an any_extend with this patch. Happy to split that out too, but not sure how to test without this change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37665
llvm-svn: 314139
Summary:
This code iterates the 'Orders' vector in parallel with the DbgValue
list, emitting all DBG_VALUEs that occurred between the last IR order
insertion point and the next insertion point. This assumes the
SDDbgValue list is sorted in IR order, which it usually is. However, it
is not sorted when a node with a debug value is replaced with another
one. When this happens, TransferDbgValues is called, and the new value
is added to the end of the list.
The problem can be solved by stably sorting the list by IR order.
Reviewers: aprantl, Ka-Ka
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: MatzeB, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38197
llvm-svn: 314114
At least for the 64-bit and less case, we should be able to determine if we even have a mask without counting any bits. This also removes the need to explicitly check for 0 active bits, isMask will return false for 0.
llvm-svn: 313908
The fix is to avoid invalidating our insertion point in
replaceDbgDeclare:
Builder.insertDeclare(NewAddress, DIVar, DIExpr, Loc, InsertBefore);
+ if (DII == InsertBefore)
+ InsertBefore = &*std::next(InsertBefore->getIterator());
DII->eraseFromParent();
I had to write a unit tests for this instead of a lit test because the
use list order matters in order to trigger the bug.
The reduced C test case for this was:
void useit(int*);
static inline void inlineme() {
int x[2];
useit(x);
}
void f() {
inlineme();
inlineme();
}
llvm-svn: 313905
Summary:
SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments is associating arguments
with frame indices (FuncInfo->setArgumentFrameIndex). That
information is later on used by EmitFuncArgumentDbgValue to
create DBG_VALUE instructions that denotes that a variable
can be found on the stack.
I discovered that for our (big endian) out-of-tree target
the association created by SelectionDAGISel::LowerArguments
sometimes is wrong. I've seen this happen when a 64-bit value
is passed on the stack. The argument will occupy two stack
slots (frame index X, and frame index X+1). The fault is
that a call to setArgumentFrameIndex is associating the
64-bit argument with frame index X+1. The effect is that the
debug information (DBG_VALUE) will point at the least significant
part of the arguement on the stack. When printing the
argument in a debugger I will get the wrong value.
I managed to create a test case for PowerPC that seems to
show the same kind of problem.
The bugfix will look at the datalayout, taking endianness into
account when examining a BUILD_PAIR node, assuming that the
least significant part is in the first operand of the BUILD_PAIR.
For big endian targets we should use the frame index from
the second operand, as the most significant part will be stored
at the lower address (using the highest frame index).
Reviewers: bogner, rnk, hfinkel, sdardis, aprantl
Reviewed By: aprantl
Subscribers: nemanjai, aprantl, llvm-commits, igorb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37740
llvm-svn: 313901
.. as well as the two subsequent changes r313826 and r313875.
This leads to segfaults in combination with ASAN. Will forward repro
instructions to the original author (rnk).
llvm-svn: 313876
Summary:
This implements the design discussed on llvm-dev for better tracking of
variables that live in memory through optimizations:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2017-September/117222.html
This is tracked as PR34136
llvm.dbg.addr is intended to be produced and used in almost precisely
the same way as llvm.dbg.declare is today, with the exception that it is
control-dependent. That means that dbg.addr should always have a
position in the instruction stream, and it will allow passes that
optimize memory operations on local variables to insert llvm.dbg.value
calls to reflect deleted stores. See SourceLevelDebugging.rst for more
details.
The main drawback to generating DBG_VALUE machine instrs is that they
usually cause LLVM to emit a location list for DW_AT_location. The next
step will be to teach DwarfDebug.cpp how to recognize more DBG_VALUE
ranges as not needing a location list, and possibly start setting
DW_AT_start_offset for variables whose lifetimes begin mid-scope.
Reviewers: aprantl, dblaikie, probinson
Subscribers: eraman, hiraditya, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37768
llvm-svn: 313825
Add support for passing SwiftError through a register on the Windows x64
calling convention. This allows the use of swifterror attributes on
parameters which is used by the swift front end for the `Error`
parameter. This partially enables building the swift standard library
for Windows x86_64.
llvm-svn: 313791
If we have an AssertZext of a truncated value that has already been AssertZext'ed,
we can assert on the wider source op to improve the zext-y knowledge:
assert (trunc (assert X, i8) to iN), i1 --> trunc (assert X, i1) to iN
This moves a fold from being Mips-specific to general combining, and x86 shows
improvements.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37017
llvm-svn: 313577
rL310710 allowed store merging to occur after legalization to catch stores that are created late,
but this exposes a logic hole seen in PR34217:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34217
We will miss merging stores if the target lowers vector extracts into target-specific operations.
This patch allows store merging to occur both before and after legalization if the target chooses
to get maximum merging.
I don't think the potential regressions in the other tests are relevant. The tests are for
correctness of weird IR constructs rather than perf tests, and I think those are still correct.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37987
llvm-svn: 313564
For cases where we are BITCASTing to vectors of smaller elements, then if the entire source was a splatted sign (src's NumSignBits == SrcBitWidth) we can say that the dst's NumSignBit == DstBitWidth, as we're just splitting those sign bits across multiple elements.
We could generalize this but at the moment the only use case I have is to peek through bitcasts to vector comparison results.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37849
llvm-svn: 313543
This caused PR34629: asserts firing when building Chromium. It also broke some
buildbots building test-suite as reported on the commit thread.
> Summary:
> 1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
> extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
> appearing in the DAG.
> e.g.
> T1 = A + B
> T2 = T1 + 10
> T3 = T2 + A
> For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
> Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
>
> 2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
> so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
> could be factored out.
> e.g.
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
> will be factored as following
> leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
> leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
>
> 3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
> thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
>
> Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
>
> Reviewed By: lsaba
>
> Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313376
Summary:
1/ Operand folding during complex pattern matching for LEAs has been
extended, such that it promotes Scale to accommodate similar operand
appearing in the DAG.
e.g.
T1 = A + B
T2 = T1 + 10
T3 = T2 + A
For above DAG rooted at T3, X86AddressMode will no look like
Base = B , Index = A , Scale = 2 , Disp = 10
2/ During OptimizeLEAPass down the pipeline factorization is now performed over LEAs
so that if there is an opportunity then complex LEAs (having 3 operands)
could be factored out.
e.g.
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,2), %rcx
will be factored as following
leal 1(%rax,%rcx,1), %rdx
leal (%rdx,%rcx) , %edx
3/ Aggressive operand folding for AM based selection for LEAs is sensitive to loops,
thus avoiding creation of any complex LEAs within a loop.
Reviewers: lsaba, RKSimon, craig.topper, qcolombet
Reviewed By: lsaba
Subscribers: spatel, igorb, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35014
llvm-svn: 313343
These are removed in C++17. We still have some users of
unary_function::argument_type, so just spell that typedef out. No
functionality change intended.
Note that many of the argument types are actually wrong :)
llvm-svn: 313287
We already have a combine for this pattern when the input to shl is add, so we just need to enable the transformation when the input is or.
Original patch by @tstellar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D19325
llvm-svn: 313251
Use RotAmt.urem(VTBits) instead of AND(RotAmt, VTBits - 1)
TBH I don't expect non-power-of-2 types to be created, but it makes the logic clearer and matches what we do in other rotation combines.
llvm-svn: 313245
After the split of the Scatter operation, the order of the new instructions is well defined - Lo goes before Hi. Otherwise the semantic of Scatter (from LSB to MSB) is broken.
I'm chaining 2 nodes to prevent reordering.
Differential Revision https://reviews.llvm.org/D37670
llvm-svn: 312894
Fixes some combine issues for AMDGPU where we weren't
getting the many extract_vector_elt combines expected
in a future patch.
This should really be checking isOperationLegalOrCustom on
the extract. That improves a number of x86 lit tests, but
a few get stuck in an infinite loop from one place
where a similar looking extract is created. I have a
different workaround in the backend for that which
keeps many of those improvements, but also adds a few
regressions.
llvm-svn: 312730
Summary:
This intrinsic represents a label with a list of associated metadata
strings. It is modelled as reading and writing inaccessible memory so
that it won't be removed as dead code. I think the intention is that the
annotation strings should appear at most once in the debug info, so I
marked it noduplicate. We are allowed to inline code with annotations as
long as we strip the annotation, but that can be done later.
Reviewers: majnemer
Subscribers: eraman, llvm-commits, hiraditya
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36904
llvm-svn: 312569
The function combineShuffleToVectorExtend in DAGCombine might generate an illegal typed node after "legalize types" phase, causing assertion on non-simple type to fail afterwards.
Adding a type check in case the combine is running after the type legalize pass.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37330
llvm-svn: 312438
Previously we would just describe the first register and then call it
quits. This patch emits fragment expressions for each register.
<rdar://problem/34075307>
llvm-svn: 312169
The loop dependence check looks for dependencies between store merge
candidates not captured by the chain sub-DAG doing a check of
predecessors which may be very large. Conservatively bound number of
nodes checked for compilation time. (Resolves PR34326).
Landing on behalf of Nirav Dave to unblock the 5.0.0 release.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37220
llvm-svn: 312022
Only do this before operations are legalized of BUILD_VECTOR is Legal for the target.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37186
llvm-svn: 311892
Summary:
If all the operands of a BUILD_VECTOR extract elements from same vector then split the
vector efficiently based on the maximum vector access index.
This will also fix PR 33784
Reviewers: zvi, delena, RKSimon, thakis
Reviewed By: RKSimon
Subscribers: chandlerc, eladcohen, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35788
llvm-svn: 311833
This goes back to a discussion about IR canonicalization. We'd like to preserve and convert
more IR to 'select' than we currently do because that's likely the best choice in IR:
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2016-September/105335.html
...but that's often not true for codegen, so we need to account for this pattern coming in
to the backend and transform it to better DAG ops.
Steps in this patch:
1. Add an EVT param to the existing convertSelectOfConstantsToMath() TLI hook to more finely
enable this transform. Other targets will probably want that anyway to distinguish scalars
from vectors. We're using that here to exclude AVX512 targets, but it may not be necessary.
2. Convert a vselect to ext+add. This eliminates a constant load/materialization, and the
vector ext is often free.
Implementing a more general fold using xor+and can be a follow-up for targets that don't have
a legal vselect. It's also possible that we can remove the TLI hook for the special case fold
implemented here because we're eliminating a constant, but it needs to be tested on other
targets.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36840
llvm-svn: 311731
Jatin Bhateja