The `opt -analyze` option only works with the legacy pass manager and might be removed in the future, as explained in llvm.org/PR53733. This patch introduced -polly-print-* passes that print what the pass would print with the `-analyze` option and replaces all uses of `-analyze` in the regression tests.
There are two exceptions: `CodeGen\single_loop_param_less_equal.ll` and `CodeGen\loop_with_condition_nested.ll` use `-analyze on the `-loops` pass which is not part of Polly.
Reviewed By: aeubanks
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120782
This patch allows invariant loads to be used in the SCoP description,
e.g., as loop bounds, conditions or in memory access functions.
First we collect "required invariant loads" during SCoP detection that
would otherwise make an expression we care about non-affine. To this
end a new level of abstraction was introduced before
SCEVValidator::isAffineExpr() namely ScopDetection::isAffine() and
ScopDetection::onlyValidRequiredInvariantLoads(). Here we can decide
if we want a load inside the region to be optimistically assumed
invariant or not. If we do, it will be marked as required and in the
SCoP generation we bail if it is actually not invariant. If we don't
it will be a non-affine expression as before. At the moment we
optimistically assume all "hoistable" (namely non-loop-carried) loads
to be invariant. This causes us to expand some SCoPs and dismiss them
later but it also allows us to detect a lot we would dismiss directly
if we would ask e.g., AliasAnalysis::canBasicBlockModify(). We also
allow potential aliases between optimistically assumed invariant loads
and other pointers as our runtime alias checks are sound in case the
loads are actually invariant. Together with the invariant checks this
combination allows to handle a lot more than LICM can.
The code generation of the invariant loads had to be extended as we
can now have dependences between parameters and invariant (hoisted)
loads as well as the other way around, e.g.,
test/Isl/CodeGen/invariant_load_parameters_cyclic_dependence.ll
First, it is important to note that we cannot have real cycles but
only dependences from a hoisted load to a parameter and from another
parameter to that hoisted load (and so on). To handle such cases we
materialize llvm::Values for parameters that are referred by a hoisted
load on demand and then materialize the remaining parameters. Second,
there are new kinds of dependences between hoisted loads caused by the
constraints on their execution. If a hoisted load is conditionally
executed it might depend on the value of another hoisted load. To deal
with such situations we sort them already in the ScopInfo such that
they can be generated in the order they are listed in the
Scop::InvariantAccesses list (see compareInvariantAccesses). The
dependences between hoisted loads caused by indirect accesses are
handled the same way as before.
llvm-svn: 249607
This single option replaces -polly-detect-unprofitable and -polly-no-early-exit
and is supposed to be the only option that disables compile-time heuristics that
aim to bail out early on scops that are believed to not benefit from Polly
optimizations.
Suggested-by: Johannes Doerfert
llvm-svn: 249426
These flags are now always passed to all tests and need to be disabled if
not needed. Disabling these flags, rather than passing them to almost all
tests, significantly simplfies our RUN: lines.
llvm-svn: 249422
Polly's profitability heuristic saves compile time by skipping trivial scops or
scops were we know no good optimization can be applied. For almost all our tests
this heuristic makes little sense as we aim for minimal test cases when testing
functionality. Hence, in almost all cases this heuristic is better be disabled.
In preparation of disabling Polly's compile time heuristic by default in the
test suite we first explicitly enable it in the couple of test cases that really
use it (or run with/without heuristic side-by-side).
llvm-svn: 249418
This will allow the ScopInfo to build the polyhedral representation for
non-affine regions that contain loops. Such loops are basically not visible
in the SCoP representation. Accesses that are variant in such loops are
therefor represented as non-affine accesses.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8153
llvm-svn: 234713
Michael Kruse