If we resolve an overloaded operator call to a specific function during
template definition, don't perform ADL during template instantiation.
Doing so finds overloads that we're not supposed to find.
llvm-svn: 315005
Summary:
Previously Clang was not considering operator declarations that occur at function scope. This is incorrect according to [over.match.oper]p3
> The set of non-member candidates is the result of the unqualified lookup of operator@ in the context of the expression according to the usual rules for name lookup in unqualified function calls.
This patch changes operator name lookup to consider block scope declarations.
This patch fixes PR27027.
Reviewers: rsmith
Reviewed By: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D35297
llvm-svn: 309530
that function, and apart from being slow, this is unnecessary: ADL can trigger
instantiations that are not permitted here. The standard isn't *completely*
clear here, but this seems like the intent, and in any case this approach is
permitted by [temp.inst]p7.
llvm-svn: 218330
Make sure we don't crash when checking whether an assignment operator
without any arguments is a special member. <rdar://problem/14397774>.
llvm-svn: 186137
Still missing cases for templates, but this is a step in the right
direction. Also omits suggestions that would be ambiguous (eg: void
func(int = 0); + void func(float = 0); func;)
llvm-svn: 183173
This matches the behavior of MemberExpr and makes diagnostics such as
"reference to non-static member function must be called" more legible in
the case that the base & member are split over multiple lines (prior to
this change the diagnostic would point to the base, not the member -
making it very unclear in chained multi-line builder-style calls)
llvm-svn: 183149
diagnostic message are compared. If either is a substring of the other, then
no error is given. This gives rise to an unexpected case:
// expect-error{{candidate function has different number of parameters}}
will match the following error messages from Clang:
candidate function has different number of parameters (expected 1 but has 2)
candidate function has different number of parameters
It will also match these other error messages:
candidate function
function has different number of parameters
number of parameters
This patch will change so that the verification string must be a substring of
the diagnostic message before accepting. Also, all the failing tests from this
change have been corrected. Some stats from this cleanup:
87 - removed extra spaces around verification strings
70 - wording updates to diagnostics
40 - extra leading or trailing characters (typos, unmatched parens or quotes)
35 - diagnostic level was included (error:, warning:, or note:)
18 - flag name put in the warning (-Wprotocol)
llvm-svn: 146619
and DefaultFunctionArrayLvalueConversion. To prevent
significant regression for should-this-be-a-call fixits,
and to repair some such regression from the introduction of
bound member placeholders, make those placeholder checks
try to build calls appropriately. Harden the build-a-call
logic while we're at it.
llvm-svn: 141738
even when overloaded and user-defined. These operators are both more
valuable to warn on (due to likely typos) and extremely unlikely to be
reasonable for use to trigger side-effects.
llvm-svn: 137823
the overloading of member and non-member functions results in arity
mismatches that don't fit well into our overload-printing scheme. This
only happens for invalid code (which breaks the arity invariants for
these cases), so just suppress the diagnostic rather than inventing
anything new. Fixes <rdar://problem/9222009>.
llvm-svn: 130902
member function, i.e. something of the form 'x.f' where 'f' is a non-static
member function. Diagnose this in the general case. Some of the new diagnostics
are probably worse than the old ones, but we now get this right much more
universally, and there's certainly room for improvement in the diagnostics.
llvm-svn: 130239
The idea is that you can create a VarDecl with an unknown type, or a
FunctionDecl with an unknown return type, and it will still be valid to
access that object as long as you explicitly cast it at every use. I'm
still going back and forth about how I want to test this effectively, but
I wanted to go ahead and provide a skeletal implementation for the LLDB
folks' benefit and because it also improves some diagnostic goodness for
placeholder expressions.
llvm-svn: 129065
operands to a binary expression; it doesn't make sense in all
contexts. The right answer would be to see if the user forgot at ().
Fixes <rdar://problem/9136502>.
llvm-svn: 127740
different types. We omit the warning when the enum types are anonymous.
Unlike GCC, this warning does not distinguish between C++ and C/ObjC for
controling whether it is on by default, it is always on by default.
Original patch contributed by Richard Trieu (@ Google), I fixed some
style issues, and cleaned it up for submission.
llvm-svn: 125739
As a bonus, fix the warning for || and && operators; it was emitted even if one of the operands had side effects, e.g:
x || test_logical_foo1();
emitted a bogus "expression result unused" for 'x'.
llvm-svn: 107274
Remove -faccess-control from -cc1; add -fno-access-control.
Make the driver pass -fno-access-control by default.
Update a bunch of tests to be correct under access control.
llvm-svn: 100880
therefore not creating ElaboratedTypes, which are still pretty-printed
with the written tag).
Most of these testcase changes were done by script, so don't feel too
sorry for my fingers.
llvm-svn: 98149
(necessarily simultaneous) changes:
- CXXBaseOrMemberInitializer now contains only a single initializer
rather than a set of initialiation arguments + a constructor. The
single initializer covers all aspects of initialization, including
constructor calls as necessary but also cleanup of temporaries
created by the initializer (which we never handled
before!).
- Rework + simplify code generation for CXXBaseOrMemberInitializers,
since we can now just emit the initializer as an initializer.
- Switched base and member initialization over to the new
initialization code (InitializationSequence), so that it
- Improved diagnostics for the new initialization code when
initializing bases and members, to match the diagnostics produced
by the previous (special-purpose) code.
- Simplify the representation of type-checked constructor initializers in
templates; instead of keeping the fully-type-checked AST, which is
rather hard to undo at template instantiation time, throw away the
type-checked AST and store the raw expressions in the AST. This
simplifies instantiation, but loses a little but of information in
the AST.
- When type-checking implicit base or member initializers within a
dependent context, don't add the generated initializers into the
AST, because they'll look like they were explicit.
- Record in CXXConstructExpr when the constructor call is to
initialize a base class, so that CodeGen does not have to infer it
from context. This ensures that we call the right kind of
constructor.
There are also a few "opportunity" fixes here that were needed to not
regress, for example:
- Diagnose default-initialization of a const-qualified class that
does not have a user-declared default constructor. We had this
diagnostic specifically for bases and members, but missed it for
variables. That's fixed now.
- When defining the implicit constructors, destructor, and
copy-assignment operator, set the CurContext to that constructor
when we're defining the body.
llvm-svn: 94952
no viable overloads. Use a different message when the class provides
no operator[] overloads at all; use it for operator(), too.
Partially addresses PR 5900.
llvm-svn: 92894
- This is designed to make it obvious that %clang_cc1 is a "test variable"
which is substituted. It is '%clang_cc1' instead of '%clang -cc1' because it
can be useful to redefine what gets run as 'clang -cc1' (for example, to set
a default target).
llvm-svn: 91446
new notion of an "initialization sequence", which encapsulates the
computation of the initialization sequence along with diagnostic
information and the capability to turn the computed sequence into an
expression. At present, I've only switched one CheckReferenceInit
callers over to this new mechanism; more will follow.
Aside from (hopefully) being much more true to the standard, the
diagnostics provided by this reference-initialization code are a bit
better than before. Some examples:
p5-var.cpp:54:12: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Derived'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'struct Base'
Derived &dr2 = b; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:55:9: error: binding of reference to type 'struct Base' to
a value of
type 'struct Base const' drops qualifiers
Base &br3 = bc; // expected-error{{drops qualifiers}}
^ ~~
p5-var.cpp:57:15: error: ambiguous conversion from derived class
'struct Diamond' to base class 'struct Base':
struct Diamond -> struct Derived -> struct Base
struct Diamond -> struct Derived2 -> struct Base
Base &br5 = diamond; // expected-error{{ambiguous conversion from
...
^~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:59:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'long'
cannot bind to
a value of unrelated type 'int'
long &lr = i; // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to type
...
^ ~
p5-var.cpp:74:9: error: non-const lvalue reference to type 'struct
Base' cannot
bind to a temporary of type 'struct Base'
Base &br1 = Base(); // expected-error{{non-const lvalue reference to
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:102:9: error: non-const reference cannot bind to bit-field
'i'
int & ir1 = (ib.i); // expected-error{{non-const reference cannot
...
^ ~~~~~~
p5-var.cpp:98:7: note: bit-field is declared here
int i : 17; // expected-note{{bit-field is declared here}}
^
llvm-svn: 90992
type, use full qualified name lookup rather than the poking the
declaration context directly. This makes sure that we see operator()'s
in superclasses. Also, move the complete-type check before this name
lookup.
llvm-svn: 88842
the DeclaratorInfo, one for semantic analysis), just build a single type whose
canonical type will reflect the semantic analysis (assuming the type is
well-formed, of course).
To make that work, make a few changes to the type system:
* allow the nominal pointee type of a reference type to be a (possibly sugared)
reference type. Also, preserve the original spelling of the reference type.
Both of these can be ignored on canonical reference types.
* Remove ObjCProtocolListType and preserve the associated source information on
the various ObjC TypeLocs. Preserve the spelling of protocol lists except in
the canonical form.
* Preserve some level of source type structure on parameter types, but
canonicalize on the canonical function type. This is still a WIP.
Drops code size, makes strides towards accurate source location representation,
slight (~1.7%) progression on Cocoa.h because of complexity drop.
llvm-svn: 84907
overload candidates (but not the built-in ones). We still rely on the
underlying built-in semantic analysis to produce the initial
diagnostic, then print the candidates following that diagnostic.
One side advantage of this approach is that we can perform more validation
of C++'s operator overloading with built-in candidates vs. the
semantic analysis for those built-in operators: when there are no
viable candidates, we know to expect an error from the built-in
operator handling code. Otherwise, we are not modeling the built-in
semantics properly within operator overloading. This is checked as:
assert(Result.isInvalid() &&
"C++ binary operator overloading is missing
candidates!");
if (Result.isInvalid())
PrintOverloadCandidates(CandidateSet, /*OnlyViable=*/false);
The assert() catches cases where we're wrong in a +Asserts build. The
"if" makes sure that, if this happens in a production clang
(-Asserts), we still build the proper built-in operator and continue
on our merry way. This is effectively what happened before this
change, but we've added the assert() to catch more flies.
llvm-svn: 83175
printing logic to help customize the output. For now, we use this
rather than a special flag to suppress the "struct" when printing
"struct X" and to print the Boolean type as "bool" in C++ but "_Bool"
in C.
llvm-svn: 72590
Richard Smith