This fixes llvm.org/PR15170.
For now, the basic formatting rules are (based on the C++11 standard):
* Surround the "->" with spaces.
* Break before "->".
Also fix typo.
llvm-svn: 185938
Basically treat a function with a trailing call similar to a function
with multiple parameters.
Before:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa))
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
After:
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa(
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa))
.aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa();
Also fix typo.
llvm-svn: 185930
-Wdocumentation won't seek -isystem. LIBXML2's headers in a certain distro might be incompatible to -Wdocumentation.
FIXME: Could autoconf detect clang or availability of -isystem?
llvm-svn: 185927
Before:
someFunction(OtherParam, BracedList{
// comment 1 (Forcing intersting break)
param1, param2,
// comment 2
param3, param4
});
After:
someFunction(OtherParam, BracedList{
// comment 1 (Forcing intersting break)
param1, param2,
// comment 2
param3, param4
});
To do so, the UnwrappedLineParser now stores the information about the
kind of brace in the FormatToken.
llvm-svn: 185914
list is the name of a class, not a namespace. Change the test as well - the previous
version did not test properly.
Fixes radar://14317928.
llvm-svn: 185898
Combined with typo correction's new ability to apply global/absolute nested
name specifiers to possible corrections, cases such as in PR12287 where the
desired function is being shadowed by a lexically closer function with the
same name but a different number of parameters will now include a FixIt.
On a side note, since the test for this change caused
test/SemaCXX/typo-correction.cpp to exceed the typo correction limit for
a single file, I've included a test case for exceeding the limit and added
some comments to both the original and part two of typo-correction.cpp
warning future editors of the files about the limit.
llvm-svn: 185881
Use UsualArithmeticConversions unconditionally in analysis of
comparisons and conditional operators: the method performs
the usual arithmetic conversions if both sides are arithmetic, and
usual unary conversions if they are not. This is just a cleanup
for conditional operators; for comparisons, it fixes the issue that
we would try to check isArithmetic() on an atomic type.
Also, fix GetExprRange() in SemaChecking.cpp so it deals with variables
of atomic type correctly.
Fixes PR15537.
llvm-svn: 185857
This adds a penalty for clang-format for each break that occurs in
a set of parentheses (including fake parenthesis that determine
the range of certain operator precendences) that have not yet been
broken. Thereby, clang-format prefers similar line breaks.
This fixes llvm.org/PR15506.
Before:
const int kTrackingOptions =
NSTrackingMouseMoved | NSTrackingMouseEnteredAndExited |
NSTrackingActiveAlways;
After:
const int kTrackingOptions = NSTrackingMouseMoved |
NSTrackingMouseEnteredAndExited |
NSTrackingActiveAlways;
Also removed ParenState::ForFakeParenthesis which has become unused.
llvm-svn: 185822
Pulled out the cache clearing in the case of descendant matching, too,
for consistency, also it is not technically needed there.
FIXME: Make cache size configurable and add unit test.
llvm-svn: 185820
Summary:
Fixes problems that lead to incorrect formatting of these and similar snippets:
/*
**
*/
/*
**/
/*
* */
/*
*test
*/
Clang-format used to think that all the cases above use "* " decoration, and
failed to calculate insertion position properly. It also used to remove leading
"* " in the last line.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
CC: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D1113
llvm-svn: 185818
It would emit @llvm.memcpy with "-triple x86_64-(mingw32|win32)" and had been failing since Nick's r185735.
; Function Attrs: nounwind
declare void @llvm.memcpy.p0i8.p0i8.i64(i8* nocapture, i8* nocapture readonly, i64, i32, i1) #1
llvm-svn: 185796
Sema::MergeFunctionDecl attempts merging two decls even if the old decl
is invalid. This can lead to interesting circumstances where we
successfully merge the decls but the result makes no sense.
Take the following for example:
template <typename T>
int main(void);
int main(void);
Sema will not consider these to be overloads of the same name because
main can't be overloaded, which means that this must be a redeclaration.
In this case the templated decl is compatible with the non-templated
decl allowing the Sema::CheckFunctionDeclaration machinery to move on
and do bizarre things like setting the previous decl of a non-templated
decl to a templated decl!
The way I see it, we should just bail from MergeFunctionDecl if the old
decl is invalid.
This fixes PR16531.
llvm-svn: 185779
* Fix up \brief documentation;
* Update C++0x references to C++11;
* Doxygen formatting: bulleted lists start with a single hyphen, not two;
* Fix a typo, "assosiate" -> "associate".
llvm-svn: 185771
This boils down to us sending invalid function decls to
CheckFunctionDeclaration becauswe we did not consider that CheckMain
could cause the decl to be invalid. Instead, interogate the new decl's
main-validity and *then* send it over to get CheckFunctionDeclaration'd
if it was still valid after calling CheckMain.
llvm-svn: 185745
Daniel Jasper