This has no material effect at this time since we don't have a direct
object emitter for mips16 and the assembler can't tell them apart. I
place a comment "16 bit inst" for those so that I can tell them apart in the
output. The constant island pass has only been minimally changed to allow
this. More complete branch work is forthcoming but this is the first
step.
llvm-svn: 194442
Hopefully Richard won't notice this terrible egregiocity - clearly the work of a malevolent poltergeist - fixed now ;)
No functionality change.
llvm-svn: 194439
No Functionality change.
This refactoring avoids having to call getCurLambda right after PushLambdaScope, to obtain the LambdaScopeInfo that was created during the call to PushLambdaScope.
llvm-svn: 194438
X86AsmPrinter::EmitInstruction, rather than X86MCInstLower::Lower.
The aim is to improve the reusability of the X86MCInstLower class by making it
more function-like. The X86::MORESTACK_RET_RESTORE_R10 pseudo broke the
function model by emitting an extra instruction to the MCStreamer attached to
the AsmPrinter.
The patch should have no impact on generated code.
llvm-svn: 194431
ARM's UAL syntax allows the same assembly file to be compiled in both ARM and
Thumb mode. Conditional execution is handled by requiring the Thumb IT blocks,
but essentially ignoring them when compiling for ARM.
llvm-svn: 194429
Fixes <rdar://15432754> [JS] Assertion: "Folded a def to a non-store!"
The primary purpose of anyregcc is to prevent a patchpoint's call
arguments and return value from being spilled. They must be available
in a register, although the calling convention does not pin the
register. It's up to the front end to avoid using this convention for
calls with more arguments than allocatable registers.
llvm-svn: 194428
The symptom is that an assertion is triggered. The assertion was added by
me to detect the situation when value is propagated from dead blocks.
(We can certainly get rid of assertion; it is safe to do so, because propagating
value from dead block to alive join node is certainly ok.)
The root cause of this bug is : edge-splitting is conducted on the fly,
the edge being split could be a dead edge, therefore the block that
split the critial edge needs to be flagged "dead" as well.
There are 3 ways to fix this bug:
1) Get rid of the assertion as I mentioned eariler
2) When an dead edge is split, flag the inserted block "dead".
3) proactively split the critical edges connecting dead and live blocks when
new dead blocks are revealed.
This fix go for 3) with additional 2 LOC.
Testing case was added by Rafael the other day.
llvm-svn: 194424
The assert this patch deletes was valid only when aliasing D2 to D1, not when
looking at a base class. Since the assert was in the path where we had already
decided to not produce an alias, just drop it.
llvm-svn: 194411
Summary:
Currently with clang:
$ clang -O20 foo.c
error: invalid value '20' in '-O20'
With the patch:
$ clang -O20 foo.c
warning: invalid value '20' in '-O20'. Fall back on value '3'
Reviewers: rengolin, hfinkel
Reviewed By: rengolin
CC: cfe-commits, hfinkel, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2125
llvm-svn: 194403
Reed Kotler