compared even when one is a reference binding and the other is not
(<rdar://problem/9173984>), but the definition of an identity sequence
does not involve lvalue-to-rvalue adjustments (PR9507). Fix both
inter-related issues.
llvm-svn: 132660
return <expression> ;
in blocks with a 'void' result type, so long as <expression> has type
'void'. This follows the rules for C++ functions.
llvm-svn: 132658
with a type-dependent expression, infer the placeholder type
'Context.DependentTy' to indicate that this is just a
placeholder. Fixes PR9982 / <rdar://problem/9486685>.
llvm-svn: 132657
__builtin_astype(): Used to reinterpreted as another data type of the same size using for both scalar and vector data types.
Added test case.
llvm-svn: 132612
Warn in cases such as "x + someCondition ? 42 : 0;",
where the condition expression looks arithmetic, and has
a right-hand side that looks boolean.
This (partly) addresses http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=9969
llvm-svn: 132565
In code such as "char* volatile const j()", Clang warns that "volatile
const" will be ignored. Make it point to the first ignored qualifier,
and simplify the code a bit.
llvm-svn: 132563
Sema::RequireCompleteExprType() a bit more, setting the point of
instantiation if needed, and skipping explicit specializations entirely.
llvm-svn: 132547
diagnostic group to cover the cases where we have definitively bad
behavior: dynamic classes.
It also rips out the existing support for POD-based checking. This
didn't work well, and triggered too many false positives. I'm looking
into a possibly more principled way to warn on the fundamental buggy
construct here. POD-ness isn't the critical aspect anyways, so a clean
slate is better. This also removes some silliness from the code until
the new checks arrive.
llvm-svn: 132534
of incomplete array type, attempt to complete the array type. This was
made much easier by Chandler's addition of RequireCompleteExprType(),
which I've tweaked (slightly) to improve the consistency of the
DeclRefExpr. Fixes PR7985.
llvm-svn: 132530
the template parameter, perform the checking as a "specified" template
argument rather than a "deduced" template argument; the latter implies
stricter type checking that is not permitted for default template
arguments.
Also, cleanup our handling of substitution of explicit template
arguments for a function template. We were actually performing some
substitution of default arguments at this point!
Fixes PR10069.
llvm-svn: 132529
+keyPathsForValuesAffecting<Key> completion was mislabeled as an
instance method, and +automaticallyNotifiesObserversOf<Key> was
missing entirely. Fixes <rdar://problem/9516762>.
llvm-svn: 132452
I tried to use an assert to prove that I could remove each of the
arguments I did, but ended up writing my assert with inverted logic.
Doh! Reported by Xi Wang on cfe-dev. I have manually verified the source
locations and ranges for these using -ast-dump. I tried writing a test
case that would catch these, but these expressions aren't exposed in the
c-index-test's token annotation utility.
llvm-svn: 132284
class type (or array thereof), eliminating some redundant checks
(thanks Eli!) and adding some tests where the behavior differs in
C++98/03 vs. C++0x.
llvm-svn: 132218
nontemplate in Sema::InstantiateTemplateDecl.
This should make the issue in PR10026 more visible, although it's not
going to fix it because something is violating this precondition.
llvm-svn: 132208
so that it looks at the initializer of a local variable of class type
(or array thereof) to determine whether it's just an implicit
invocation of the trivial default constructor. Fixes PR10034.
llvm-svn: 132191
within class templates when they are necessary to complete the type of
the member. The canonical example is code like:
template <typename T> struct S {
static const int arr[];
static const int x;
static int f();
};
template <typename T> const int S<T>::arr[] = { 1, 2, 3 };
template <typename T> const int S<T>::x = sizeof(arr) / sizeof(arr[0]);
template <typename T> int S<T>::f() { return x; }
int x = S<int>::f();
We need to instantiate S<T>::arr's definition to pick up its initializer
and complete the array type. This involves new code to specially handle
completing the type of an expression where the type alone is
insufficient. It also requires *updating* the expression with the newly
completed type. Fortunately, all the other infrastructure is already in
Clang to do the instantiation, do the completion, and prune out the
unused bits of code that result from this instantiation.
This addresses the initial bug in PR10001, and will be a step to
fleshing out other cases where we need to work harder to complete an
expression's type. Who knew we still had missing C++03 "features"?
llvm-svn: 132172
parameter types to be ill-formed. However, it relies on the
completeness of method parameter types when producing metadata, e.g.,
for a protocol, leading IR generating to crash in such cases.
Since there's no real way to tighten down the semantics of Objective-C
here without breaking existing code, do something safe but lame:
suppress the generation of metadata when this happens.
Fixes <rdar://problem/9123036>.
llvm-svn: 132171
provide re-usable forms of the rest of the custom validation done here.
Still no functionality changed here.
With this it should be possible to have an expression-centric code path
and a type-centric code path which don't duplicate logic.
llvm-svn: 132118
traits which uses the information embedded in the expression. Use this
to simplify several interfaces which repeated information embedded in
the expression through explicit arguments. I added an assertion that the
only extra piece of data to come in from the parser matches what is
stored in the expression. No functionality change intended here.
Also cleaned up the doxygen comments for some of these methods and some
formatting oddities.
llvm-svn: 132115
makes it into a special member function. This is very bad and can lead
to all sorts of nastiness including implicit member functions violating
the One Definition Rule. This should probably be made ill-formed in a
later version of the standard, but for now we'll just warn.
llvm-svn: 132104
behind implicit moves. We now correctly identify move constructors and
assignment operators and update bits on the record correctly. Generation
of implicit moves (declarations or definitions) is not yet supported.
llvm-svn: 132080
type that turns one type into another. This is used as the basis to
implement __underlying_type properly - with TypeSourceInfo and proper
behavior in the face of templates.
llvm-svn: 132017
Douglas Gregor