The error previously talked about a "section header" but was actually
referring to a program header.
Reviewed by: grimar, MaskRay
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76846
See `docs/ELF/linker_script.rst` for the new computation for sh_addr and sh_addralign.
`ALIGN(section_align)` now means: "increase alignment to section_align"
(like yet another input section requirement).
The "start of section .foo changes from 0x11 to 0x20" warning no longer
makes sense. Change it to warn if sh_addr%sh_addralign!=0.
To decrease the alignment from the default max_input_align,
use `.output ALIGN(8) : {}` instead of `.output : ALIGN(8) {}`
See linkerscript/section-address-align.test as an example.
When both an output section address and ALIGN are set (can be seen as an
"undefined behavior" https://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2020-03/msg00115.html),
lld may align more than GNU ld, but it makes a linker script working
with GNU ld hard to break with lld.
This patch can be considered as restoring part of the behavior before D74736.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75724
Summary:
Places orphan sections into a unique output section. This prevents the merging of orphan sections of the same name.
Matches behaviour of GNU ld --unique. --unique=pattern is not implemented.
Motivated user case shown in the test has 2 local symbols as they would appear if C++ source has been compiled with -ffunction-sections. The merging of these sections in the case of a partial link (-r) may limit the effectiveness of -gc-sections of a subsequent link.
Reviewers: espindola, jhenderson, bd1976llvm, edd, andrewng, JonChesterfield, MaskRay, grimar, ruiu, psmith
Reviewed By: MaskRay, grimar
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75536
```
createFiles(args)
readDefsym
readerLinkerScript(*mb)
...
readMemory
readMemoryAssignment("ORIGIN", "org", "o") // eagerly evaluated
target = getTarget();
link(args)
writeResult<ELFT>()
...
finalizeSections()
script->processSymbolAssignments()
addSymbol(cmd) // with this patch, evaluated here
```
readMemoryAssignment eagerly evaluates ORIGIN/LENGTH and returns an uint64_t.
This patch postpones the evaluation to make
* --defsym and symbol assignments
* `CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE)` (requires a non-null `lld:🧝:target`)
work. If the expression somehow requires interaction with memory
regions, the circular dependency may cause the expression to evaluate to
a strange value. See the new test added to memory-err.s
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75763
They are purposefully skipped by input section descriptions (rL295324).
Similarly, --orphan-handling= should not warn/error for them.
This behavior matches GNU ld.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75151
This makes --orphan-handling= less noisy.
This change also improves our compatibility with GNU ld.
GNU ld special cases .symtab, .strtab and .shstrtab . We need output section
descriptions for .symtab, .strtab and .shstrtab to suppress:
<internal>:(.symtab) is being placed in '.symtab'
<internal>:(.shstrtab) is being placed in '.shstrtab'
<internal>:(.strtab) is being placed in '.strtab'
With --strip-all, .symtab and .strtab can be omitted (note, --strip-all is not compatible with --emit-relocs).
Reviewed By: nickdesaulniers
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75149
When the output section address (addrExpr) is specified, GNU ld warns if
sh_addr is different. This patch implements the warning.
Note, LinkerScript::assignAddresses can be called more than once. We
need to record the changed section addresses, and only report the
warnings after the addresses are finalized.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74741
Follow-up for D74286.
Notations:
* alignExpr: the computed ALIGN value
* max_input_align: the maximum of input section alignments
This patch changes the following two cases to match GNU ld:
* When ALIGN is present, GNU ld sets output sh_addr to alignExpr, while lld use max(alignExpr, max_input_align)
* When addrExpr is specified but alignExpr is not, GNU ld sets output sh_addr to addrExpr, while lld uses `advance(0, max_input_align)`
Note, sh_addralign is still set to max(alignExpr, max_input_align).
lma-align.test is enhanced a bit to check we don't overalign sh_addr.
fixSectionAlignments() sets addrExpr but not alignExpr for the `!hasSectionsCommand` case.
This patch sets alignExpr as well so that max_input_align will be respected.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74736
D43468+D44380 added INSERT [AFTER|BEFORE] for non-orphan sections. This patch
makes INSERT work for orphan sections as well.
`SECTIONS {...} INSERT [AFTER|BEFORE] .foo` does not set `hasSectionCommands`, so the result
will be similar to a regular link without a linker script. The differences when `hasSectionCommands` is set include:
* image base is different
* -z noseparate-code/-z noseparate-loadable-segments are unavailable
* some special symbols such as `_end _etext _edata` are not defined
The behavior is similar to GNU ld:
INSERT is not considered an external linker script.
This feature makes the section layout more flexible. It can be used to:
* Place .nv_fatbin before other readonly SHT_PROGBITS sections to mitigate relocation overflows.
* Disturb the layout to expose address sensitive application bugs.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74375
GNU ld has a counterintuitive lang_propagate_lma_regions rule.
```
// .foo's LMA region is propagated to .bar because their VMA region is the same,
// and .bar does not have an explicit output section address (addr_tree).
.foo : { *(.foo) } >RAM AT> FLASH
.bar : { *(.bar) } >RAM
// An explicit output section address disables propagation.
.foo : { *(.foo) } >RAM AT> FLASH
.bar . : { *(.bar) } >RAM
```
In both cases, lld thinks .foo's LMA region is propagated and
places .bar in the same PT_LOAD, so lld diverges from GNU ld w.r.t. the
second case (lma-align.test).
This patch changes Writer<ELFT>::createPhdrs to disable propagation
(start a new PT_LOAD). A user of the first case can make linker scripts
portable by explicitly specifying `AT>`. By contrast, there was no
workaround for the old behavior.
This change uncovers another LMA related bug in assignOffsets() where
`ctx->lmaOffset = 0;` was omitted. It caused a spurious "load address
range overlaps" error for at2.test
The new PT_LOAD rule is complex. For convenience, I listed the origins of some subexpressions:
* rL323449: `sec->memRegion == load->firstSec->memRegion`; linkerscript/at3.test
* D43284: `load->lastSec == Out::programHeaders` (don't start a new PT_LOAD after program headers); linkerscript/at4.test
* D58892: `sec != relroEnd` (start a new PT_LOAD after PT_GNU_RELRO)
Reviewed By: psmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74297
When lmaRegion is non-null, respect `sec->alignment`
This rule is analogous to `switchTo(sec)` which advances sh_addr (VMA).
This fixes the p_paddr misalignment issue as reported by
https://android-review.googlesource.com/c/trusty/external/trusted-firmware-a/+/1230058
Note, `sec->alignment` is the maximum of ALIGN and input section alignments. We may overalign LMA than GNU ld.
linkerscript/align-lma.s has a FIXME that demonstrates another bug:
`.bss ... >RAM` should be placed in a different PT_LOAD (GNU ld
behavior) because its lmaRegion (nullptr) is different from the previous
section's lmaRegion (ROM).
Reviewed By: psmith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74286
This is how it should've been and brings it more in line with
std::string_view. There should be no functional change here.
This is mostly mechanical from a custom clang-tidy check, with a lot of
manual fixups. It uncovers a lot of minor inefficiencies.
This doesn't actually modify StringRef yet, I'll do that in a follow-up.
Add new method getFirstInputSection and use instead of getInputSections
where appropriate to avoid creation of an unneeded vector of input
sections.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D73047
The INPUT_SECTION_FLAGS linker script command is used to constrain the
section pattern matching to sections that match certain combinations of
flags.
There are two ways to express the constraint.
withFlags: Section must have these flags.
withoutFlags: Section must not have these flags.
The syntax of the command is:
INPUT_SECTION_FLAGS '(' sect_flag_list ')'
sect_flag_list: NAME
| sect_flag_list '&' NAME
Where NAME matches a section flag name such as SHF_EXECINSTR, or the
integer value of a section flag. If the first character of NAME is ! then
it means must not contain flag.
We do not support the rare case of { INPUT_SECTION_FLAGS(flags) filespec }
where filespec has no input section description like (.text).
As an example from the ld man page:
SECTIONS {
.text : { INPUT_SECTION_FLAGS (SHF_MERGE & SHF_STRINGS) *(.text) }
.text2 : { INPUT_SECTION_FLAGS (!SHF_WRITE) *(.text) }
}
.text will match sections called .text that have both the SHF_MERGE and
SHF_STRINGS flag.
.text2 will match sections called .text that don't have the SHF_WRITE flag.
The flag names accepted are the generic to all targets and SHF_ARM_PURECODE
as it is very useful to filter all the pure code sections into a single
program header that can be marked execute never.
fixes PR44265
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72756
Moved the section name check ahead of any filename matching or
exclusion. Firstly, this reduces the need to retrieve the filename and
secondly, reduces the amount of potentially expensive filename pattern
matching if such rules are present in the linker script.
The impact of this change is particularly significant when linking
objects built with -ffunction-sections and -fstack-size-section, using a
linker script that includes non-trivial filename patterns. In a number
of such cases, the link time is halved.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D72775
This makes it clear `ELF/**/*.cpp` files define things in the `lld::elf`
namespace and simplifies `elf::foo` to `foo`.
Reviewed By: atanasyan, grimar, ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68323
llvm-svn: 373885
Merging SHF_LINK_ORDER sections can affect semantics if the sh_link
fields point to different sections.
Specifically, for SHF_LINK_ORDER sections, the sh_link field acts as a reverse
dependency from the linked section, causing the SHF_LINK_ORDER section to
be included if the linked section is included. Merging sections with different
sh_link fields will cause the entire contents of the SHF_LINK_ORDER section
to be associated with a single (arbitrarily chosen) output section, whereas the
correct semantics are for the individual pieces of the SHF_LINK_ORDER section
to be associated with their linked output sections. As a result we can end up
incorrectly dropping SHF_LINK_ORDER section contents or including the wrong
section contents, depending on which linked sections were chosen.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68094
llvm-svn: 373255
Fixes PR43461 (regression caused by D67504)
The partition field of a SECTIONS-specified section is not set after
D67504. The 0 value affects findSection() which checks if the partition
field is 1.
So `Out::initArray = findSection(".init_array")` is null, and
DT_INIT_ARRAYSZ is not set.
Reviewed By: peter.smith
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68087
llvm-svn: 372996
D67504 removed uses of `assigned` from OutputSection::addSection, which
makes `assigned` purely used in processSectionCommands() and its
callees. By replacing its references with `parent`, we can remove
`assigned`.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67531
llvm-svn: 372735
Fixes PR38748
mergeSections() calls getOutputSectionName() to get output section
names. Two MergeInputSections may be merged even if they are made
different by SECTIONS commands.
This patch moves mergeSections() after processSectionCommands() and
addOrphanSections() to fix the issue. The new pass is renamed to
OutputSection::finalizeInputSections().
processSectionCommands() and addorphanSections() are changed to add
sections to InputSectionDescription::sectionBases.
finalizeInputSections() merges MergeInputSections and migrates
`sectionBases` to `sections`.
For the -r case, we drop an optimization that tries keeping sh_entsize
non-zero. This is for the simplicity of addOrphanSections(). The
updated merge-entsize2.s reflects the change.
Reviewed By: grimar
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67504
llvm-svn: 372734
If there is no readonly section, we map:
* The ELF header at imageBase+maxPageSize
* Program headers at imageBase+maxPageSize+sizeof(Ehdr)
* The first section .text at imageBase+maxPageSize+sizeof(Ehdr)+sizeof(program headers)
Due to the interaction between Writer<ELFT>::fixSectionAlignments and
LinkerScript::allocateHeaders,
`alignDown(p_vaddr(R PT_LOAD)) = alignDown(p_vaddr(RX PT_LOAD))`.
The RX PT_LOAD will override the R PT_LOAD at runtime, which is not ideal:
```
// PHDR at 0x401034, should be 0x400034
PHDR 0x000034 0x00401034 0x00401034 0x000a0 0x000a0 R 0x4
// R PT_LOAD contains just Ehdr and program headers.
// At 0x401000, should be 0x400000
LOAD 0x000000 0x00401000 0x00401000 0x000d4 0x000d4 R 0x1000
LOAD 0x0000d4 0x004010d4 0x004010d4 0x00001 0x00001 R E 0x1000
```
* createPhdrs allocates the headers to the R PT_LOAD.
* fixSectionAlignments assigns `imageBase+maxPageSize+sizeof(Ehdr)+sizeof(program headers)` (formula: `alignTo(dot, maxPageSize) + dot % config->maxPageSize`) to addrExpr of .text
* allocateHeaders computes the minimum address among SHF_ALLOC sections, i.e. addr(.text)
* allocateHeaders sets address of ELF header to `addr(.text)-sizeof(Ehdr)-sizeof(program headers) = imageBase+maxPageSize`
The main observation is that when the SECTIONS command is not used, we
don't have to call allocateHeaders. This requires an assumption that
the presence of PT_PHDR and addresses of headers can be decided
regardless of address information.
This may seem natural because dot is not manipulated by a linker script.
The other thing is that we have to drop the special rule for -T<section>
in `getInitialDot`. If -Ttext is smaller than the image base, the headers
will not be allocated with the old behavior (allocateHeaders is called)
but always allocated with the new behavior.
The behavior change is not a problem. Whether and where headers are
allocated can vary among linkers, or ld.bfd across different versions
(--enable-separate-code or not). It is thus advised to use a linker
script with the PHDRS command to have a consistent behavior across
linkers. If PT_PHDR is needed, an explicit --image-base can be a simpler
alternative.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67325
llvm-svn: 371957
Fixes PR39418. Complements D47241 (the non-linker-script case).
processSectionCommands() assigns input sections to output sections.
ICF is called before it, so .text.foo and .text.bar may be folded even if
their output sections are made different by SECTIONS commands.
```
markLive<ELFT>()
doIcf<ELFT>() // During ICF, we don't know the output sections
writeResult()
combineEhSections<ELFT>()
script->processSectionCommands() // InputSection -> OutputSection assignment
```
This patch splits processSectionCommands() into processSectionCommands() and
processSymbolAssignments(), and moves processSectionCommands() before ICF:
```
markLive<ELFT>()
combineEhSections<ELFT>()
script->processSectionCommands()
doIcf<ELFT>() // should remove folded input sections
writeResult()
script->processSymbolAssignments()
```
An alternative approach is to unfold a section `sec` in
processSectionCommands() when we find `sec` and `sec->repl` belong to
different output sections. I feel this patch is superior because this
can fold more sections and the decouple of
SectionCommand/SymbolAssignment gives flexibility:
* An ExprValue can't be evaluated before its section is assigned to an
output section -> we can delete getOutputSectionVA and simplify
another place where we had to check if the output section is null.
Moreover, a case in linkerscript/early-assign-symbol.s can be handled
now.
* processSectionCommands/processSymbolAssignments can be freely moved
around.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66717
llvm-svn: 370635
PR42990. For `SECTIONS { b = a; . = 0xff00 + (a >> 8); a = .; }`,
we currently set st_value(a)=0xff00 while st_value(b)=0xffff.
The following call tree demonstrates the problem:
```
link<ELF64LE>(Args);
Script->declareSymbols(); // insert a and b as absolute Defined
Writer<ELFT>().run();
Script->processSectionCommands();
addSymbol(cmd); // a and b are re-inserted. LinkerScript::getSymbolValue
// is lazily called by subsequent evaluation
finalizeSections();
forEachRelSec(scanRelocations<ELFT>);
processRelocAux // another problem PR42506, not affected by this patch
finalizeAddressDependentContent(); // loop executed once
script->assignAddresses(); // a = 0, b = 0xff00
script->assignAddresses(); // a = 0xff00, _end = 0xffff
```
We need another assignAddresses() to finalize the value of `a`.
This patch
1) modifies assignAddress() to track the original section/value of each
symbol and return a symbol whose section/value has changed.
2) moves the post-finalizeSections assignAddress() inside the loop
of finalizeAddressDependentContent() and makes it iterative.
Symbol assignment may not converge so we make a few attempts before
bailing out.
Note, assignAddresses() must be called at least twice. The penultimate
call finalized section addresses while the last finalized symbol values.
It is somewhat obscure and there was no comment.
linkerscript/addr-zero.test tests this.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66279
llvm-svn: 369889
Summary:
libstdc++ in GCC 5.1 has some bugs. The move to C++14 in D66195 triggered one
such bug caused by the new constexpr support in C++14, and the implementation
doing SFINAE wrong with the comparator to std::stable_sort.
Here's a small repro: https://godbolt.org/z/2QC3-n
The fix is to inline the lambdas directly into the llvm::stable_sort call
instead of erasing them through a std::function. The code is more readable as
well.
Reviewers: thakis, ruiu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, MaskRay, jkorous, dexonsmith, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66306
llvm-svn: 369023
Now that we've moved to C++14, we no longer need the llvm::make_unique
implementation from STLExtras.h. This patch is a mechanical replacement
of (hopefully) all the llvm::make_unique instances across the monorepo.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D66259
llvm-svn: 368936
If the dot gets moved by an explicit section address, an empty gap between sections could be created. The encompassing region for the section being parsed needs to be expanded to include the gap.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D65722
Patch by Gabriel Smith!
llvm-svn: 368379
This patch is mechanically generated by clang-llvm-rename tool that I wrote
using Clang Refactoring Engine just for creating this patch. You can see the
source code of the tool at https://reviews.llvm.org/D64123. There's no manual
post-processing; you can generate the same patch by re-running the tool against
lld's code base.
Here is the main discussion thread to change the LLVM coding style:
https://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-February/130083.html
In the discussion thread, I proposed we use lld as a testbed for variable
naming scheme change, and this patch does that.
I chose to rename variables so that they are in camelCase, just because that
is a minimal change to make variables to start with a lowercase letter.
Note to downstream patch maintainers: if you are maintaining a downstream lld
repo, just rebasing ahead of this commit would cause massive merge conflicts
because this patch essentially changes every line in the lld subdirectory. But
there's a remedy.
clang-llvm-rename tool is a batch tool, so you can rename variables in your
downstream repo with the tool. Given that, here is how to rebase your repo to
a commit after the mass renaming:
1. rebase to the commit just before the mass variable renaming,
2. apply the tool to your downstream repo to mass-rename variables locally, and
3. rebase again to the head.
Most changes made by the tool should be identical for a downstream repo and
for the head, so at the step 3, almost all changes should be merged and
disappear. I'd expect that there would be some lines that you need to merge by
hand, but that shouldn't be too many.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64121
llvm-svn: 365595
We create several types of synthetic sections for loadable partitions, including:
- The dynamic symbol table. This allows code outside of the loadable partitions
to find entry points with dlsym.
- Creating a dynamic symbol table also requires the creation of several other
synthetic sections for the partition, such as the dynamic table and hash table
sections.
- The partition's ELF header is represented as a synthetic section in the
combined output file, and will be used by llvm-objcopy to extract partitions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62350
llvm-svn: 362819
We currently (ab)use the Live bit on output sections to track whether
the section has ever had an input section added to it, and then later
use it during orphan placement. This will conflict with one of my upcoming
partition-related changes that will assign all output sections to a partition
(thus marking them as live) so that they can be added to the correct segment
by the code that creates program headers.
Instead of using the Live bit for this purpose, create a new flag and
start using it to track the property explicitly.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62348
llvm-svn: 362444
Fixes the remaining issue of PR41673 after D61186: with `/DISCARD/ { ... } :NONE`,
we may create an output section named `/DISCARD/`.
Note, if an input section is named `/DISCARD/`, ld.bfd discards it but
lld keeps it. It is probably not worth copying this behavior as it is unrealistic.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62768
llvm-svn: 362356
This change causes us to read partition specifications from partition
specification sections and split output sections into partitions according
to their reachability from partition entry points.
This is only the first step towards a full implementation of partitions. Later
changes will add additional synthetic sections to each partition so that
they can be loaded independently.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60353
llvm-svn: 361925
My recent commits separated symbol resolution from the symbol table,
so the functions to resolve symbols are now in a somewhat wrong file.
This patch moves it to Symbols.cpp.
The functions are now member functions of the symbol.
This is code move change. I modified function names so that they are
appropriate as member functions, though. No functionality change
intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62290
llvm-svn: 361474
For memory5.test, ld.bfd appears to ignore `. += 0x2000;`, so the test was testing
a wrong behavior. After deleting the code added in rLLD336335, we match ld.bfd and thus fix PR41357.
PR37836 (memory4.test) seems to have been fixed by another change.
Reviewed By: ruiu
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62177
llvm-svn: 361228
This is a mechanical rewrite of replaceSymbol(A, B) to A->replace(B).
I also added a comment to Symbol::replace().
Technically this change is not necessary, but this change makes code a
bit more concise.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62117
llvm-svn: 361123
This is the last patch of the series of patches to make it possible to
resolve symbols without asking SymbolTable to do so.
The main point of this patch is the introduction of
`elf::resolveSymbol(Symbol *Old, Symbol *New)`. That function resolves
or merges given symbols by examining symbol types and call
replaceSymbol (which memcpy's New to Old) if necessary.
With the new function, we have now separated symbol resolution from
symbol lookup. If you already have a Symbol pointer, you can directly
resolve the symbol without asking SymbolTable to do that.
Now that the nice abstraction become available, I can start working on
performance improvement of the linker. As a starter, I'm thinking of
making --{start,end}-lib faster.
--{start,end}-lib is currently unnecessarily slow because it looks up
the symbol table twice for each symbol.
- The first hash table lookup/insertion occurs when we instantiate a
LazyObject file to insert LazyObject symbols.
- The second hash table lookup/insertion occurs when we create an
ObjFile from LazyObject file. That overwrites LazyObject symbols
with Defined symbols.
I think it is not too hard to see how we can now eliminate the second
hash table lookup. We can keep LazyObject symbols in Step 1, and then
call elf::resolveSymbol() to do Step 2.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61898
llvm-svn: 360975
Previously, we handled common symbols as a kind of Defined symbol,
but what we were doing for common symbols is pretty different from
regular defined symbols.
Common symbol and defined symbol are probably as different as shared
symbol and defined symbols are different.
This patch introduces CommonSymbol to represent common symbols.
After symbols are resolved, they are converted to Defined symbols
residing in a .bss section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61895
llvm-svn: 360841
SymbolTable's add-family functions have lots of parameters because
when they have to create a new symbol, they forward given arguments
to Symbol's constructors. Therefore, the functions take at least as
many arguments as their corresponding constructors.
This patch simplifies the add-family functions. Now, the functions
take a symbol instead of arguments to construct a symbol. If there's
no existing symbol, a given symbol is memcpy'ed to the symbol table.
Otherwise, the functions attempt to merge the existing and a given
new symbol.
I also eliminated `CanOmitFromDynSym` parameter, so that the functions
take really one argument.
Symbol classes are trivially constructible, so looks like constructing
them to pass to add-family functions is as cheap as passing a lot of
arguments to the functions. A quick benchmark showed that this patch
seems performance-neutral.
This is a preparation for
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131902.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61855
llvm-svn: 360838
The -n (--nmagic) disables page alignment, and acts as a -Bstatic
The -N (--omagic) does what -n does but also marks the executable segment as
writeable. As page alignment is disabled headers are not allocated unless
explicit in the linker script.
To disable page alignment in LLD we choose to set the page sizes to 1 so
that any alignment based on the page size does nothing. To set the
Target->PageSize to 1 we implement -z common-page-size, which has the side
effect of allowing the user to set the value as well.
Setting the page alignments to 1 does mean that any use of
CONSTANT(MAXPAGESIZE) or CONSTANT(COMMONPAGESIZE) in a linker script will
return 1, unlike in ld.bfd. However given that -n and -N disable paging
these probably shouldn't be used in a linker script where -n or -N is in
use.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61688
llvm-svn: 360593
/DISCARD/ output sections were being treated as orphans. As a result, if
a /DISCARD/ output section has been assigned a PHDR, it could cause
incorrect assignment of sections to segments.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61186
llvm-svn: 359565
Fangrui Song