Summary:
Added WarnOnlyIfThisHasSuspiciousField option to allow
to catch any copy assignment operator independently from
the container class's fields.
Added the cert alias using this option.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: mgorny, Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62192
llvm-svn: 361550
Summary:
I inspected every test and did one of the following:
- changed the test to run in all language modes,
- added a comment explaining why the test is only applicable in a
certain mode,
- limited the test to language modes where it passes and added a FIXME
to fix the checker or the test.
Reviewers: alexfh, lebedev.ri
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, arphaman, jdoerfert, lebedev.ri, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D62125
llvm-svn: 361131
Summary:
modernize-loop-convert was not detecting implicit casts to
const_iterator as convertible to range-based loops:
std::vector<int> vec{1,2,3,4}
for(std::vector<int>::const_iterator i = vec.begin();
i != vec.end();
++i) { }
Thanks to Don Hinton for advice.
As well, this change adds a note for this check's applicability to code
targeting OpenMP prior version 5 as this check will continue breaking
compilation with `-fopenmp`. Thanks to Roman Lebedev for pointing this
out.
Fixes PR#35082
Patch by Torbjörn Klatt!
Reviewed By: hintonda
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61827
llvm-svn: 360788
Summary:
modernize-loop-convert was not detecting implicit casts to
const_iterator as convertible to range-based loops:
std::vector<int> vec{1,2,3,4}
for(std::vector<int>::const_iterator i = vec.begin();
i != vec.end();
++i) { }
Thanks to Don Hinton for advice.
As well, this change adds a note for this check's applicability to code
targeting OpenMP prior to version 5 as this check will continue breaking
compilation with `-fopenmp`. Thanks to Roman Lebedev for pointing this
out.
Fixes PR#35082
Reviewed By: hintonda
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61827
llvm-svn: 360785
Implement a check for detecting if/else if/else chains where two or more
branches are Type I clones of each other (that is, they contain identical code)
and for detecting switch statements where two or more consecutive branches are
Type I clones of each other.
Patch by Donát Nagy!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54757
llvm-svn: 360779
Summary:
Fixed https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40544
Before, we would generate a fixit like `(anonymous namespace)::Foo::fun();` for
the added test case.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, xazax.hun
Subscribers: rnkovacs, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61874
llvm-svn: 360698
Summary:
readability-redundant-declaration was diagnosing a redundant declaration
on "extern inline void f();", which is needed in C code to force an external definition
of the inline function f. (This is different to how inline behaves in C++).
Reviewers: alexfh, danielmarjamaki
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61700
llvm-svn: 360613
Summary:
This check searches for copy assignment operators which might not handle self-assignment properly. There are three patterns of
handling a self assignment situation: self check, copy-and-swap or the less common copy-and-move. The new check warns if none of
these patterns is found in a user defined implementation.
See also:
OOP54-CPP. Gracefully handle self-copy assignment
https://wiki.sei.cmu.edu/confluence/display/cplusplus/OOP54-CPP.+Gracefully+handle+self-copy+assignment
Reviewers: JonasToth, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: riccibruno, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60507
llvm-svn: 360540
Add the modernize-use-trailing-return check to rewrite function signatures to use trailing return types.
Patch by Bernhard Manfred Gruber.
llvm-svn: 360438
Summary:
If the test does not specify a formatting style, force "none"; otherwise
autodetection logic can discover a ".clang-tidy" file that is not
related to the test.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61739
llvm-svn: 360358
Summary:
The case when initialize_list hides behind an implicit case was not
handled before.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61642
llvm-svn: 360231
Accidentally taking the size of a struct-pointer type or a value of this type
is more common than explicitly using the & operator for the value. This patch
extends the check to include these cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61260
llvm-svn: 360114
Some programmers tend to forget that subtracting two pointers results in the
difference between them in number of elements of the pointee type instead of
bytes. This leads to codes such as `size_t size = (p - q) / sizeof(int)` where
`p` and `q` are of type `int*`. Or similarily, `if (p - q < buffer_size *
sizeof(int)) { ... }`. This patch extends `bugprone-sizeof-expression` to
detect such cases.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61422
llvm-svn: 360032
I'm not sure what i was thinking when i wrote it to point at the directive.
It's at the very least confusing, and in the `for` is very misleading.
We should point at the actual Stmt out of which the exception escapes,
to highlight where it should be fixed e.g. via adding try-catch block.
Yes, this breaks existing NOLINT, which is why this change needs to
happen now, not any later.
llvm-svn: 360002
D61187 didn't delete config.clangd_xpc_support from test/
CLANGD_BUILD_XPC is defined in clangd/CMakeLists.txt and not available in test/lit.site.cfg.py.in
llvm-svn: 359428
Summary:
Motivation:
- this layout is a pain to work with
- without a common root, it's painful to express things like "disable clangd" (D61122)
- CMake/lit configs are a maintenance hazard, and the more the one-off hacks
for various tools are entangled, the more we see apathy and non-ownership.
This attempts to use the bare-minimum configuration needed (while still
supporting the difficult cases: windows, standalone clang build, dynamic libs).
In particular the lit.cfg.py and lit.site.cfg.py.in are merged into lit.cfg.in.
The logic in these files is now minimal.
(Much of clang-tools-extra's lit configs can probably be cleaned up by reusing
lit.llvm.llvm_config.use_clang(), and every llvm project does its own version of
LDPATH mangling. I haven't attempted to fix any of those).
Docs are still in clang-tools-extra/docs, I don't have any plans to touch those.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jfb, cfe-commits, ilya-biryukov, thakis
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61187
llvm-svn: 359424
Summary:
Looks at conditionals and finds cases of ``cast<>``, which will
assert rather than return a null pointer, and ``dyn_cast<>`` where
the return value is not captured. Additionally, finds cases that
match the pattern ``var.foo() && isa<X>(var.foo())``, where the
method is called twice and could be expensive.
.. code-block:: c++
// Finds cases like these:
if (auto x = cast<X>(y)) <...>
if (cast<X>(y)) <...>
// But not cases like these:
if (auto f = cast<Z>(y)->foo()) <...>
if (cast<Z>(y)->foo()) <...>
Reviewers: alexfh, rjmccall, hokein, aaron.ballman, JonasToth
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xbolva00, Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59802
llvm-svn: 359142
Summary: We already have the structure internally, we just need to expose it.
Reviewers: ilya-biryukov
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60267
llvm-svn: 358675
Summary:
Also add a test to verify clang-tidy only apply the first alternative
fix.
Reviewers: alexfh
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60857
llvm-svn: 358666
Summary:
Currently we emit an unfriendly "clang diagnostic" message when rename fails. This
patch makes clangd to emit a detailed diagnostic message.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60821
llvm-svn: 358658
Before the patch calling clang-tidy with -header-filter=.* -system-headers would
result in a few hundred useless warnings:
warning: macro '_GNU_SOURCE' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '_LP64' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_ACQUIRE' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_ACQ_REL' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_CONSUME' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_RELAXED' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_RELEASE' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__ATOMIC_SEQ_CST' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
warning: macro '__BIGGEST_ALIGNMENT__' used to declare a constant; consider using a 'constexpr' constant [cppcoreguidelines-macro-usage]
... and so on
llvm-svn: 358621
Summary:
This check aims to address a relatively common benign error where
Objective-C subclass initializers call -self on their superclass instead
of invoking a superclass initializer, typically -init. The error is
typically benign because libobjc recognizes that improper initializer
chaining is common¹.
One theory for the frequency of this error might be that -init and -self
have the same return type which could potentially cause inappropriate
autocompletion to -self instead of -init. The equal selector lengths and
triviality of common initializer code probably contribute to errors like
this slipping through code review undetected.
This check aims to flag errors of this form in the interests of
correctness and reduce incidence of initialization failing to chain to
-[NSObject init].
[1] "In practice, it will be hard to rely on this function.
Many classes do not properly chain -init calls."
From _objc_rootInit in https://opensource.apple.com/source/objc4/objc4-750.1/runtime/NSObject.mm.auto.html.
Test Notes:
Verified via `make check-clang-tools`.
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59806
llvm-svn: 358620
Summary:
- for warnings, use the flag the warning is controlled by (-Wfoo)
- for errors, keep using the internal name (there's nothing better) but
drop the err_ prefix
This comes at the cost of uniformity, it's no longer totally obvious
exactly what the code field contains. But the -Wname flags are so much
more useful to end-users than the internal warn_foo that this seems worth it.
Reviewers: kadircet
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60822
llvm-svn: 358611
Before this patch readability-misleading-indentation could issue diagnostics
with an invalid location, which would lead to an assertion failure in
ClangTidyContext::diag()
llvm-svn: 358589
Summary:
Motivation/Context: in the code review system integrating with clang-tidy,
clang-tidy doesn't provide a human-readable description of the fix. Usually
developers have to preview a code diff (before vs after apply the fix) to
understand what the fix does before applying a fix.
This patch proposes that each clang-tidy check provides a short and
actional fix description that can be shown in the UI, so that users can know
what the fix does without previewing diff.
This patch extends clang-tidy framework to support fix descriptions (will add implementations for
existing checks in the future). Fix descriptions and fixes are emitted via diagnostic::Note (rather than
attaching the main warning diagnostic).
Before this patch:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning") << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...);
}
```
After:
```
void MyCheck::check(...) {
...
diag(loc, "my check warning"); // Emit a check warning
diag(loc, "fix description", DiagnosticIDs::Note) << FixtItHint::CreateReplacement(...); // Emit a diagnostic note and a fix
}
```
Reviewers: sammccall, alexfh
Reviewed By: alexfh
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman, JonasToth, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59932
llvm-svn: 358576
Summary:
The bugprone-too-small-loop-variable check often catches loop variables which can represent "big enough" values, so we don't actually need to worry about that this variable will overflow in a loop when the code iterates through a container. For example a 32 bit signed integer type's maximum value is 2 147 483 647 and a container's size won't reach this maximum value in most of the cases.
So the idea of this option to allow the user to specify an upper limit (using magnitude bit of the integer type) to filter out those catches which are not interesting for the user, so he/she can focus on the more risky integer incompatibilities.
Next to the option I replaced the term "positive bits" to "magnitude bits" which seems a better naming both in the code and in the name of the new option.
Reviewers: JonasToth, alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59870
llvm-svn: 358356
The CMake variable controlling if XPC code is built is called
CLANGD_BUILD_XPC but three places unintentionally checked the
non-existent variable CLANGD_BUILD_XPC_SUPPORT instead, which (due to
being nonexistent, and due to cmake) always silently evaluated to false.
Luckily the test still seems to pass, despite never running after being
added almost 3 months ago in r351280.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D60120
llvm-svn: 357719
Fix the crash resulting from a careless use of getLocWithOffset. At the
beginning of a macro expansion it produces an invalid SourceLocation that causes
an assertion failure later on.
llvm-svn: 357312
The Yaml module is missing on some systems and on many of clang buildbots.
But the test for run-clang-tidy.py doesn't fail due to 'NOT' statement masking a python runtime error.
This patch conditionally imports and enables the yaml module only if it's present in the system.
If not, then '-export-fixes' is disabled.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59734
llvm-svn: 357114
Summary:
Still some pieces to go here: unit tests for new SourceCode functionality and
a command-line flag to force utf-8 mode. But wanted to get early feedback.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58275
llvm-svn: 357102
Makes the name of this directory consistent with the names of the other
directories in clang-tools-extra.
Similar to r356254. No intended behavior change.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59750
llvm-svn: 356897
Summary:
The LSP clients cannot know clangd will not send diagnostic updates
for closed files, so we send them an empty list of diagnostics to
avoid showing stale diagnostics for closed files in the UI, e.g. in the
"Problems" pane of VSCode.
Fixes PR41217.
Reviewers: hokein
Reviewed By: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59757
llvm-svn: 356880
Use InitLLVM and WithColor
Delete PPTraceConsumer, add the callback in PPTraceAction
Migrae to tooling::createExecutorFromCommandLineArgs
Don't specialize empty OutputFileName
llvm-svn: 356849
Summary:
Finally, we are here!
Analyzes OpenMP Structured Blocks and checks that no exception escapes
out of the Structured Block it was thrown in.
As per the OpenMP specification, structured block is an executable statement,
possibly compound, with a single entry at the top and a single exit at the
bottom. Which means, ``throw`` may not be used to to 'exit' out of the
structured block. If an exception is not caught in the same structured block
it was thrown in, the behaviour is undefined / implementation defined,
the program will likely terminate.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, baloghadamsoftware, gribozavr
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, gribozavr
Subscribers: mgorny, xazax.hun, rnkovacs, guansong, jdoerfert, cfe-commits, ABataev
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59466
llvm-svn: 356802
Summary:
Finds OpenMP directives that are allowed to contain `default` clause,
but either don't specify it, or the clause is specified but with the kind
other than `none`, and suggests to use `default(none)` clause.
Using `default(none)` clause changes the default variable visibility from
being implicitly determined, and thus forces developer to be explicit about the
desired data scoping for each variable.
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman, xazax.hun, hokein, gribozavr
Reviewed By: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jdoerfert, openmp-commits, klimek, sbenza, arphaman, Eugene.Zelenko, ABataev, mgorny, rnkovacs, guansong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #openmp, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57113
llvm-svn: 356801
Summary:
Add a way to expand modular headers for PPCallbacks. Checks can opt-in for this
expansion by overriding the new registerPPCallbacks virtual method and
registering their PPCallbacks in the preprocessor created for this specific
purpose.
Use module expansion in the readability-identifier-naming check
Reviewers: gribozavr, usaxena95, sammccall
Reviewed By: gribozavr
Subscribers: nemanjai, mgorny, xazax.hun, kbarton, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang, #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59528
llvm-svn: 356750
Summary:
In contrast to Google C++, Objective-C often uses built-in integer types
other than `int`. In fact, the Objective-C runtime itself defines the
types NSInteger¹ and NSUInteger² which are variant types depending on
the target architecture. The Objective-C style guide indicates that
usage of system types with variant sizes is appropriate when handling
values provided by system interfaces³. Objective-C++ is commonly the
result of conversion from Objective-C to Objective-C++ for the purpose
of integrating C++ functionality. The opposite of Objective-C++ being
used to expose Objective-C functionality to C++ is less common,
potentially because Objective-C has a signficantly more uneven presence
on different platforms compared to C++. This generally predisposes
Objective-C++ to commonly being more Objective-C than C++. Forcing
Objective-C++ developers to perform conversions between variant system types
and fixed size integer types depending on target architecture when
Objective-C++ commonly uses variant system types from Objective-C is
likely to lead to more bugs and overhead than benefit. For that reason,
this change proposes to disable google-runtime-int in Objective-C++.
[1] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/objectivec/nsinteger?language=objc
[2] https://developer.apple.com/documentation/objectivec/nsuinteger?language=objc
[3] "Types long, NSInteger, NSUInteger, and CGFloat vary in size between
32- and 64-bit builds. Use of these types is appropriate when handling
values exposed by system interfaces, but they should be avoided for most
other computations."
https://github.com/google/styleguide/blob/gh-pages/objcguide.md#types-with-inconsistent-sizes
Subscribers: xazax.hun, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59336
llvm-svn: 356627
Summary:
-ignore specifies a list of PP callbacks to ignore. It cannot express a
whitelist, which may be more useful than a blacklist.
Add a new option -callbacks to replace it.
-ignore= (default) => -callbacks='*' (default)
-ignore=FileChanged,FileSkipped => -callbacks='*,-FileChanged,-FileSkipped'
-callbacks='Macro*' : print only MacroDefined,MacroExpands,MacroUndefined,...
Reviewers: juliehockett, aaron.ballman, alexfh, ioeric
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: nemanjai, kbarton, jsji, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59296
llvm-svn: 356366
Makes the name of this directory consistent with the names of the other
directories in clang-tools-extra.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59382
llvm-svn: 356254
This is an analog of the abseil-duration-comparison check, but for the
absl::Time domain. It has a similar implementation and tests.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58977
llvm-svn: 355835
Summary:
The current install-clang-headers target installs clang's resource
directory headers. This is different from the install-llvm-headers
target, which installs LLVM's API headers. We want to introduce the
corresponding target to clang, and the natural name for that new target
would be install-clang-headers. Rename the existing target to
install-clang-resource-headers to free up the install-clang-headers name
for the new target, following the discussion on cfe-dev [1].
I didn't find any bots on zorg referencing install-clang-headers. I'll
send out another PSA to cfe-dev to accompany this rename.
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/cfe-dev/2019-February/061365.html
Reviewers: beanz, phosek, tstellar, rnk, dim, serge-sans-paille
Subscribers: mgorny, javed.absar, jdoerfert, #sanitizers, openmp-commits, lldb-commits, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang, #sanitizers, #lldb, #openmp, #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58791
llvm-svn: 355340
Summary:
The usefulness of **modernize-use-override** can be reduced if you have to live in an environment where you support multiple compilers, some of which sadly are not yet fully C++11 compliant
some codebases have to use override as a macro OVERRIDE e.g.
```
// GCC 4.7 supports explicit virtual overrides when C++11 support is enabled.
```
This allows code to be compiled with C++11 compliant compilers and get warnings and errors that clang, MSVC,gcc can give, while still allowing other legacy pre C++11 compilers to compile the code. This can be an important step towards modernizing C++ code whilst living in a legacy codebase.
When it comes to clang tidy, the use of the **modernize-use-override** is one of the most useful checks, but the messages reported are inaccurate for that codebase if the standard approach is to use the macros OVERRIDE and/or FINAL.
When combined with fix-its that introduce the C++11 override keyword, they become fatal, resulting in the modernize-use-override check being turned off to prevent the introduction of such errors.
This revision, allows the possibility for the replacement **override **to be a macro instead, Allowing the clang-tidy check to be run on both pre and post C++11 code, and allowing fix-its to be applied.
Reviewers: alexfh, JonasToth, hokein, Eugene.Zelenko, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: alexfh, JonasToth
Subscribers: lewmpk, malcolm.parsons, jdoerfert, xazax.hun, cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57087
llvm-svn: 355132
Summary: Detect a few expressions as likely character expressions, see PR27723.
Reviewers: xazax.hun, alexfh
Subscribers: rnkovacs, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58609
llvm-svn: 355089
Summary:
Implicit functions are outside the control of source authors and should
be exempt from style restrictions.
Tested via running clang tools tests.
This is an amended followup to https://reviews.llvm.org/D57207
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jdoerfert, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58095
llvm-svn: 354534
Summary: To take up the .clangd folder for other potential uses in the future.
Reviewers: kadircet, sammccall
Reviewed By: kadircet
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58440
llvm-svn: 354505
"modernize-use-using" check is applicable only to C++11 and later. Spell it out
to avoid relying on default language version.
rdar://problem/47932196
llvm-svn: 354069
Summary:
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40593.
Non-percent-encoded chars doesn't cause any problems on the input-side since we
assume everything after authority section is data and don't interpret them as
delimeters.
Reviewers: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58126
llvm-svn: 353857
Summary:
The modernize-use-default-member-init check crashes when trying to
create an assignment value for a value-initialized enum because it isn't a
BuiltinType.
An enum cannot be initialized by assigning 0 to it unless a cast is added.
It could be initialized with an enumerator with the value 0, but there might not
be one.
Avoid these issues by ignoring the UseAssignment setting for value-initialized
enums.
Fixes PR35050.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, alexfh, JonasToth
Reviewed By: JonasToth
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57852
llvm-svn: 353554
bugprone-argument-comment only supports identifying those comments which do not match the function parameter name
This revision add 3 options to adding missing argument comments to literals (granularity on type is added to control verbosity of fixit)
```
CheckOptions:
- key: bugprone-argument-comment.CommentBoolLiterals
value: '1'
- key: bugprone-argument-comment.CommentFloatLiterals
value: '1'
- key: bugprone-argument-comment.CommentIntegerLiterals
value: '1'
- key: bugprone-argument-comment.CommentStringLiterals
value: '1'
- key: bugprone-argument-comment.CommentCharacterLiterals
value: '1'
- key: bugprone-argument-comment.CommentUserDefinedLiterals
value: '1'
- key: bugprone-argument-comment.CommentNullPtrs
value: '1'
```
After applying these options, literal arguments will be preceded with /*ParameterName=*/
Reviewers: JonasToth, Eugene.Zelenko, alexfh, hokein, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman, Eugene.Zelenko
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57674
llvm-svn: 353535
Summary:
The check should ignore the main function, the program entry point.
It is not possible to use `std::array<>` for the `argv`.
The alternative is to use `char** argv`.
Fixes [[ https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40604 | PR40604 ]]
Reviewers: JonasToth, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, hans, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57787
llvm-svn: 353327
Summary:
Implicit functions are outside the control of source authors and should
be exempt from style restrictions.
Tested via running clang tools tests.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57207
llvm-svn: 352968
Summary:
This helps minimize the disruption of not returning declarations as part of
a find-definition response (r352864).
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, ilya-biryukov
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57580
llvm-svn: 352953
Summary:
LSP now reflects the declaration/definition distinction.
Language server changes:
- textDocument/definition now returns a definition if one is found, otherwise
the declaration. It no longer returns declaration + definition if they are
distinct.
- textDocument/declaration returns the best declaration we can find.
- For macros, the active macro definition is returned for both methods.
- For include directive, the top of the target file is returned for both.
There doesn't appear to be a discovery mechanism (we can't return everything to
clients that only know about definition), so this changes existing behavior.
In practice, it should greatly reduce the fraction of the time we need to show
the user a menu of options.
C++ API changes:
- findDefinitions is replaced by locateSymbolAt, which returns a
vector<LocatedSymbol> - one for each symbol under the cursor.
- this contains the preferred declaration, the definition (if found), and
the symbol name
This API enables some potentially-neat extensions, like swapping between decl
and def, and exposing the symbol name to the UI in the case of multiple symbols.
Reviewers: hokein
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, javed.absar, ioeric, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57388
llvm-svn: 352864
Summary:
This would make diagnostic fixits more discoverable, especially for
plugins like YCM.
Reviewers: sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: ilya-biryukov, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, kadircet, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57509
llvm-svn: 352764
This should not happen in normal operation, as it implies that the diagnostics
with some available fixes were produced but the AST is invalid.
Moreover, the code had an error: always returned code actions ignoring the
SupportsCodeAction capability and writing a test for this is impossible,
since this can only happen due to programmer's error rather than invalid inputs.
llvm-svn: 352624
Summary:
The code tweaks are an implementation of mini-refactorings exposed
via the LSP code actions. They run in two stages:
- Stage 1. Decides whether the action is available to the user and
collects all the information required to finish the action.
Should be cheap, since this will run over all the actions known to
clangd on each textDocument/codeAction request from the client.
- Stage 2. Uses information from stage 1 to produce the actual edits
that the code action should perform. This stage can be expensive and
will only run if the user chooses to perform the specified action in
the UI.
One unfortunate consequence of this change is increased latency of
processing the textDocument/codeAction requests, which now wait for an
AST. However, we cannot avoid this with what we have available in the LSP
today.
Reviewers: kadircet, ioeric, hokein, sammccall
Reviewed By: sammccall
Subscribers: mgrang, mgorny, MaskRay, jkorous, arphaman, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56267
llvm-svn: 352494
Summary:
Because _Float16 was disabled for X86 targets the unit-tests started failing.
Extract the pieces for _Float16 and run theses tests under AArch64.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman, erichkeane, lebedev.ri
Reviewed By: erichkeane
Subscribers: javed.absar, xazax.hun, kristof.beyls, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57249
llvm-svn: 352231
Seems the previous statement does not hold up anymore.
Reviewers: steveire
Reviewed By: steveire
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57102
llvm-svn: 352031
The readability-else-after-return check should be smarter about cases where the
variable defined in the condition is used in the `else` branch. This patch makes
it just ignore such cases, but alternative solutions may be better (added a
FIXME).
llvm-svn: 351751
Otherwise we don't warn on a struct containing a single public int, but
we warn on a struct containing a single public std::string, which is
inconsistent.
llvm-svn: 351686
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
The underlying issue is fixed in https://reviews.llvm.org/D56444
and this test ensures the issue does not creep back into our
code-base.
Reviewers: alexfh, aaron.ballman, hokein, hwright
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56918
llvm-svn: 351569
Dmitri Gribenko