We have assertions for this, but a few edge cases had snuck through where
we were still unconditionally using 'int'.
<rdar://problem/15703011>
llvm-svn: 197733
We now have symbols with floating-point type to make sure that
(double)x == (double)x comes out true, but we still can't do much with
these. For now, don't even bother trying to create a floating-point zero
value; just give up on conversion to bool.
PR14634, C++ edition.
llvm-svn: 190953
This does not actually give us the right behavior for reinterpret_cast
of references. Reverting so I can think about it some more.
This reverts commit 50a75a6e26a49011150067adac556ef978639fe6.
llvm-svn: 158341
These casts only appear in very well-defined circumstances, in which the
target of a reinterpret_cast or a function formal parameter is an lvalue
reference. According to the C++ standard, the following are equivalent:
reinterpret_cast<T&>( x)
*reinterpret_cast<T*>(&x)
[expr.reinterpret.cast]p11
llvm-svn: 158338
Jordan Rose