While these might make sense for some rule (e.g. break after multi-line
operand), they generally appear ugly and confusing.
Before:
fffffffffff(R\"x(
multiline raw string literal xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
)x\" + bbbbbb)
After:
fffffffffff(R\"x(
multiline raw string literal xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
)x\" +
bbbbbb)
llvm-svn: 204937
correctly order comments in SourceManager::isBeforeInTranslationUnit() order
Unfortunately, this is not as simple as it was implemented previously, and
actually requires doing a merge sort.
llvm-svn: 204936
This produces valid IR now that llvm rejects aliases to weak aliases and warns
the user that the resolution is not changed if the weak alias is overridden.
llvm-svn: 204935
This adds back r204781.
Original message:
Aliases are just another name for a position in a file. As such, the
regular symbol resolutions are not applied. For example, given
define void @my_func() {
ret void
}
@my_alias = alias weak void ()* @my_func
@my_alias2 = alias void ()* @my_alias
We produce without this patch:
.weak my_alias
my_alias = my_func
.globl my_alias2
my_alias2 = my_alias
That is, in the resulting ELF file my_alias, my_func and my_alias are
just 3 names pointing to offset 0 of .text. That is *not* the
semantics of IR linking. For example, linking in a
@my_alias = alias void ()* @other_func
would require the strong my_alias to override the weak one and
my_alias2 would end up pointing to other_func.
There is no way to represent that with aliases being just another
name, so the best solution seems to be to just disallow it, converting
a miscompile into an error.
llvm-svn: 204934
Store the number of clauses and children of OMPExecutableDirective and dynamically compute the locations of corresponding arrays.
http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D2977
llvm-svn: 204933
Summary:
Patch by Robert N. M. Watson
His work was sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Small corrections by myself.
CC: theraven, matheusalmeida
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3199
llvm-svn: 204924
of MCELFStreamer.
This is so that changes to MipsELFStreamer will automatically propagate through
its subclasses.
No functional changes (MipsELFStreamer has the same functionality of MCELFStreamer
at the moment).
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3130
llvm-svn: 204918
This allows us to insert some hooks before emitting data into an actual object file.
For example, we can capture the register usage for a translation unit by overriding
the EmitInstruction method. The register usage information is needed to generate
.reginfo and .Mips.options ELF sections.
No functional changes.
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3129
llvm-svn: 204917
Summary:
The short name is quite convenient so provide an accessor for them instead.
No functional change
Depends on D3177
Reviewers: matheusalmeida
Reviewed By: matheusalmeida
Differential Revision: http://llvm-reviews.chandlerc.com/D3178
llvm-svn: 204911
These don't seem to have any real point. Let's start with
IndexingContext. I can't come up with any conceivable reason to have
many hundereds of thousands of these alive in an address space which
would make the 4x difference in allocated (but unused) memory for the
string scratch buffer a significant memory usage problem.
The EditedSource one is somewhat more surprising. This is an 8x increase
in the memory allocated (but not used) per editted source file. However,
for this to realistically be a problem, you would need to have over half
a million editted source files in a single address space, and even that
would only really have problems on 32-bit Windows where you really only
have 2gb of virtual address space. And what's more important, the fix to
this if it is actually an issue shouldn't be to shrink the allocator's
size, it is to pass a single allocator into *many* edited source file
objects and let them share the memory.
These were the only two uses of custom sized BumpPtrAllocators
(excluding ones in the JIT using a custom allocation strategy) in all of
LLVM, Clang, LLD, LLDB, or Polly. I don't think we actually need this
complexity in the primary BumpPtrAllocator at all and am planning to
remove it.
llvm-svn: 204910
rewrite some of them to be more clear.
The terminology being used in our allocators is making me really sad. We
call things slab allocators that aren't at all slab allocators. It is
quite confusing.
llvm-svn: 204907
Fix description:
Expressions like 'cmp r0, #(l1 - l2) >> 3' could not be evaluated on asm parsing stage,
since it is impossible to resolve labels on this stage. In the end of stage we still have
expression (MCExpr).
Then, when we want to encode it, we expect it to be an immediate, but it still an expression.
Patch introduces a Fixup (MCFixup instance), that is processed after main encoding stage.
llvm-svn: 204899
Dmitri Gribenko