Doing that in an anonymous version is a bit silly, but this opens the
way for supporting it in general.
Since we don't support actual versions, for now we just disable the
version script if we detect that it is missing a local.
llvm-svn: 273000
I think it is me who named these variables, but I always find that
they are slightly confusing because align is a verb.
Adding four letters is worth it.
llvm-svn: 272984
Patch updates the version script parser to parse versioned files.
In a simple way, just adding them to VersionScriptGlobals list.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21439
llvm-svn: 272934
PltZero (or PLT[0]) was an appropriate name for the little code
we have at beginning of the PLT section when we only supported x86
since the code for x86 just fits in the first PLT slot.
It's not the case anymore. The code for ARM64 occupies first two
slots, so PltZero spans PLT[0] and PLT[1], for example.
This patch renames it to avoid confusion.
llvm-svn: 272913
For ARM and MIPS, we don't need to call this function.
This patch passes a symbol instead of a PLT entry address
so that the target handler can call it if necessary.
llvm-svn: 272910
Add support for the R_ARM_THM relocations used in the objects present
in arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc. These are:
R_ARM_THM_CALL
R_ARM_THM_JUMP11
R_ARM_THM_JUMP19
R_ARM_THM_JUMP24
R_ARM_THM_MOVT_ABS
R_ARM_THM_MOVW_ABS_NC
Interworking between ARM and Thumb is partially supported with BLX.
The R_ARM_CALL relocation for ARM instructions and R_ARM_THM_CALL
relocation for Thumb instructions will write out a BL or BLX depending
on the state of the Target.
Assumptions:
- Availability of BLX and extended range of Thumb 4-byte Branch
instructions.
- In relocateOne if (Val & 0x1) == 1 target is Thumb, 0 is ARM.
This will hold for objects that comply with the ABI for the
ARM architecture.
This is sufficient for hello world to work with a recent
arm-linux-gnueabihf distribution.
Limitations:
No interworking for R_ARM_JUMP24, R_ARM_THM_JUMP24, R_ARM_THM_JUMP19
and the deprecated R_ARM_PLT32 and R_ARM_PC24 instructions as these
cannot be written out as a BLX and need a state change thunk.
No range extension thunks. The R_ARM_JUMP24 and R_ARM_THM_CALL have a
range of 16Mb
llvm-svn: 272881
This should never happen with correct programs, but it is trivial
write a testcase where lld would crash or report duplicated
symbols. We now behave like when an archive is used and include the
file only once.
llvm-svn: 272724
Previously message told us that relocations could
not be used when making shared object. That was
correct because message could appear (and it is expected)
when we linked executable.
Message should have being changed to something
that says we can't use a subset of relocations against shared
symbols.
Patch fixes the text.
llvm-svn: 272478
In isPreemptible routine we interested in R_MIPS_GPREL16 relocation
only. This relocation fits 0xf. So the new mask 0xff is just to conform
the ABI specification.
llvm-svn: 272388
Initially we wanted to check that these two relocations are not present when linking DSO because of
possible overflow in runtime. Patch moves them to writable segment in testcases to allow
proper error check to trigger.
Otherwise error message about using dynamic relocations against text segment was shown.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21184
llvm-svn: 272379
It was reported in PR28020, that lld does not link code which
gold do. But in fact that is expected behavior as we do not
support DT_TEXTREL.
This patch changes error message as it can report about relocations against
text segments exclusively, other dynamic relocations errors can
be handled separately.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21133
llvm-svn: 272377
We can now use this to decide whether to emit a verneed during the final
pass over the symbols. We were previously wrongly creating a verneed entry
in the case where all references to a DSO's symbols were weak.
In a future change we may also want to use the used bit to control whether
shared symbols are preemptible and appear in the dynsym. This seems a little
tricky to do at the moment because isNeeded() is templated.
The only other functional change here is that we emit a DT_NEEDED for DSOs
whose symbols are all preempted by objects that appear later in the link. But
that doesn't seem too important to me.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21171
llvm-svn: 272282
If the symbol is local we don't need to create a R_X86_64_DTPOFF64, we
can just write the correct value in the got.
Should fix pr28018.
llvm-svn: 272205
Previously this test performed check of binary data. Since
llvm-readobj currently able to dump all 3 types of version relative
sections, that can be used to make this test more transparent.
Patch do that.
Differential revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21024
llvm-svn: 272120
Rafael Espindola