candidates with coldcc attribute.
This recommits r322721 reverted due to sanitizer memory leak build bot failures.
Original commit message:
This patch adds support for the coldcc calling convention for Power.
This changes the set of non-volatile registers. It includes a pass to stress
test the implementation by marking all static directly called functions with
the coldcc attribute through the option -enable-coldcc-stress-test. It also
includes an option, -ppc-enable-coldcc, to add the coldcc attribute to
functions which are cold at all call sites based on BlockFrequencyInfo when
the containing function does not call any non cold functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38413
llvm-svn: 323778
candidates with coldcc attribute.
This patch adds support for the coldcc calling convention for Power.
This changes the set of non-volatile registers. It includes a pass to stress
test the implementation by marking all static directly called functions with
the coldcc attribute through the option -enable-coldcc-stress-test. It also
includes an option, -ppc-enable-coldcc, to add the coldcc attribute to
functions which are cold at all call sites based on BlockFrequencyInfo when
the containing function does not call any non cold functions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38413
llvm-svn: 322721
The inliner performs some kind of dead code elimination as it goes,
but there are cases that are not really caught by it. We might
at some point consider teaching the inliner about them, but it
is OK for now to run GlobalOpt + GlobalDCE in tandem as their
benefits generally outweight the cost, making the whole pipeline
faster.
This fixes PR34652.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38154
llvm-svn: 314997
Summary:
Otherwise we might end up with some empty basic blocks or
single-entry-single-exit basic blocks.
This fixes PR32085
Reviewers: chandlerc, danielcdh
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, RKSimon, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30468
llvm-svn: 301395
Summary: For functions with profile data, we are confident that loop sink will be optimal in sinking code.
Reviewers: davidxl, hfinkel
Subscribers: mehdi_amini, mzolotukhin, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D26155
llvm-svn: 286325
This pass is supposed to reduce the size of the IR for compile time
purpose. We should run it ASAP, except when we prepare for LTO or
ThinLTO, and we want to keep them available for link-time inline.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19813
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268394
This is where it was originally, until LoopVersioningLICM was
inserted before in r259986, I don't believe it was on purpose.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D19809
From: Mehdi Amini <mehdi.amini@apple.com>
llvm-svn: 268252
routine.
We were getting this wrong in small ways and generally being very
inconsistent about it across loop passes. Instead, let's have a common
place where we do this. One minor downside is that this will require
some analyses like SCEV in more places than they are strictly needed.
However, this seems benign as these analyses are complete no-ops, and
without this consistency we can in many cases end up with the legacy
pass manager scheduling deciding to split up a loop pass pipeline in
order to run the function analysis half-way through. It is very, very
annoying to fix these without just being very pedantic across the board.
The only loop passes I've not updated here are ones that use
AU.setPreservesAll() such as IVUsers (an analysis) and the pass printer.
They seemed less relevant.
With this patch, almost all of the problems in PR24804 around loop pass
pipelines are fixed. The one remaining issue is that we run simplify-cfg
and instcombine in the middle of the loop pass pipeline. We've recently
added some loop variants of these passes that would seem substantially
cleaner to use, but this at least gets us much closer to the previous
state. Notably, the seven loop pass managers is down to three.
I've not updated the loop passes using LoopAccessAnalysis because that
analysis hasn't been fully wired into LoopSimplify/LCSSA, and it isn't
clear that those transforms want to support those forms anyways. They
all run late anyways, so this is harmless. Similarly, LSR is left alone
because it already carefully manages its forms and doesn't need to get
fused into a single loop pass manager with a bunch of other loop passes.
LoopReroll didn't use loop simplified form previously, and I've updated
the test case to match the trivially different output.
Finally, I've also factored all the pass initialization for the passes
that use this technique as well, so that should be done regularly and
reliably.
Thanks to James for the help reviewing and thinking about this stuff,
and Ben for help thinking about it as well!
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17435
llvm-svn: 261316
especially the *structure* of it with respect to various pass managers.
This uncovers an absolute horror show of problems. This test shows just
how bad PR24804 is: we have a totaly of *seven* loop pass managers in
the main optimization pipeline.
I've tried to comment the various bits to the best of my knowledge, but
more enhancements here would be great.
Also great would be folks adding various test for other pipelines, I'm
focused on trying to fix the O2 pipeline. I just wanted a test to show
what I'm changing.
llvm-svn: 261305
Zaara Syeda