Since r312249 instructions of a entry block of region statements are
not marked as root anymore and hence can theoretically be removed
if unused. Theoretically, because the instruction list was not changed.
Still, MemoryAccesses for unused instructions were removed. This lead
to a failed assertion in the code generator when the MemoryAccess for
the still listed instruction was not found.
This hould fix the
Assertion failed: ArrayAccess && "No array access found for instruction!",
file ScopInfo.h, line 1494
compiler crashes.
llvm-svn: 312566
Before this patch, OpTree did not consider forwarding an operand tree consisting
of only single LoadInst as useful. The motivation was that, like an access to a
read-only variable, it would just replace one MemoryAccess by another. However,
in contrast to read-only accesses, this would replace a scalar access by an
array access, which is something worth doing.
In addition, leaving scalar MemoryAccess is problematic in that VirtualUse
prioritizes inter-Stmt use over intra-Stmt. It was possible that the same LLVM
value has a MemoryAccess for accessing the remote Stmt's LoadInst as well as
having the same LoadInst in its own instruction list (due to being forwarded
from another operand tree).
With this patch we ensure that if a LoadInst is forwarded is any operand tree,
also the operand tree containing just the LoadInst is forwarded as well, which
effectively removes the scalar MemoryAccess such that only the array access
remains, not both.
Thanks Michael for the detailed explanation.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, bellu, singam-sanjay, gareevroman
Subscribers: hfinkel, pollydev, llvm-commits
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37424
llvm-svn: 312456
In certain situations, the context in the isl_ast_build could result for the
min/max locations of our alias sets to become empty, which would cause an
internal error in isl, which is then unable to derive a value for these
expressions. Check these conditions before code generating expressions and
instead assume that alias check succeeded. This is valid, as the corresponding
memory accesses will not be executed under any valid context.
This fixed llvm.org/PR34432. Thanks to Qirun Zhang for reporting.
llvm-svn: 312455
In case a PHI node follows an error block we can assume that the incoming value
can only come from the node that is not an error block. As a result, conditions
that seemed non-affine before are now in fact affine.
llvm-svn: 312410
In Polly, we specifically add a paramter to represent the outermost dimension
size of fortran arrays. We do this because this information is statically
available from the fortran metadata generated by dragonegg.
However, we were only materializing these parameters (meaning, creating an
llvm::Value to back the isl_id) from *memory accesses*. This is wrong,
we should materialize parameters from *scop array info*.
It is wrong because if there is a case where we detect 2 fortran arrays,
but only one of them is accessed, we may not materialize the other array's
dimensions at all.
This is incorrect. We fix this by looping over all
`polly::ScopArrayInfo` in a scop, rather that just all `polly::MemoryAccess`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37379
llvm-svn: 312350
Mark scalar dependences for different statements belonging to same BB
as 'Inter'.
Contributed-by: Nandini Singhal <cs15mtech01004@iith.ac.in>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37147
llvm-svn: 312324
Currently, GVN can be necessary to eliminate redundant instructions in case
of, for instance, GEMM and float type. This patch makes GVN be run during
the cleanup.
Reviewed-by: Tobias Grosser <tobias@grosser.es>,
Michael Kruse <llvm@meinersbur.de>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37340
llvm-svn: 312307
Summary:
After region statements now also have instruction lists, this is a
straightforward extension.
Reviewers: Meinersbur, bollu, singam-sanjay, gareevroman
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: hfinkel, pollydev, llvm-commits
Tags: #polly
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37298
llvm-svn: 312249
This is useful when we face certain intrinsics such as `llvm.exp.*`
which cannot be lowered by the NVPTX backend while other intrinsics can.
So, we would need to keep blacklists of intrinsics that cannot be
handled by the NVPTX backend. It is much simpler to try and promote
all intrinsics to libdevice versions.
This patch makes function/intrinsic very uniform, and will always try to use
a libdevice version if it exists.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37056
llvm-svn: 312239
The adds code generation support for the previous commit.
This patch has been re-applied, after the memory issue in the previous patch
has been fixed.
llvm-svn: 312211
By using statement lists in the entry blocks of region statements, instruction
level analyses also work on region statements.
We currently only model the entry block of a region statements, as this is
sufficient for most transformations the known-passes currently execute. Modeling
instructions in the presence of control flow (e.g. infinite loops) is left
out to not increase code complexity too much. It can be added when good use
cases are found.
This change set is reapplied, after a memory corruption issue had been fixed.
llvm-svn: 312210
By using statement lists in the entry blocks of region statements, instruction
level analyses also work on region statements.
We currently only model the entry block of a region statements, as this is
sufficient for most transformations the known-passes currently execute. Modeling
instructions in the presence of control flow (e.g. infinite loops) is left
out to not increase code complexity too much. It can be added when good use
cases are found.
llvm-svn: 312128
Reduction detection is only executed in the SCoP building phase.
Hence it fits better into ScopBuilder to separate
SCoP-construction from SCoP modeling.
llvm-svn: 312118
This method is only called in the SCoP building phase.
Therefore it fits better into ScopBuilder to separate
SCoP-construction from SCoP modeling.
llvm-svn: 312117
This method is only called in the SCoP building phase.
Therefore it fits better into ScopBuilder to separate
SCoP-construction from SCoP modeling.
llvm-svn: 312116
This method is only called in the SCoP building phase.
Therefore it fits better into ScopBuilder to separate
SCoP-construction from SCoP modeling.
This mostly mechanical change makes ScopBuilder directly access some of
ScopStmt/MemoryAccess private fields. We add ScopBuilder as a friend
class and will add proper accessor functions sometime later.
llvm-svn: 312115
This patch allows annotating of metadata in ir instruction
(with "polly_split_after"), which specifies where to split a particular
scop statement.
Contributed-by: Nandini Singhal <cs15mtech01004@iith.ac.in>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36402
llvm-svn: 312107
The intrinsics memset, memcopy and memmove do have their memory accesses
modeled by ScopBuilder. Do not consider them error-case behavior.
Test case will come with a future patch that requires memory intrinsics
outside of error blocks.
llvm-svn: 312021
Commit r252725 introduced a "return false" if an ignored intrinsics was
found. The consequence of this was that the mere existence of an ignored
intrinsic (such as llvm.dbg.value) before a call that would have
qualified the block to be an error block, to not be an error block.
The obvious goal was to just skip ignored intrinsics, not changing the
meaning of what an error block is.
llvm-svn: 312020
ZoneAlgo used to bail out for the complete SCoP if it encountered
something violating its assumption. This meant the neither OpTree can
forward any load nor DeLICM do anything in such cases, even if their
transformations are unrelated to the violations.
This patch adds a list of compatible elements (currently with the
granularity of entire arrays) that can be used for analysis. OpTree
and DeLICM can then check whether their transformations only concern
compatible elements, and skip non-compatible ones.
This will be useful for e.g. Polybench's benchmarks covariance,
correlation, bicg, doitgen, durbin, gramschmidt, adi that have
assumption violation, but which are not necessarily relevant
for all transformations.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37219
llvm-svn: 311929
Properly require and preserve the OptimizationRemarkEmitter for use in
ScopPass. Previously one had to get the ORE from ScopDetection because
CodeGeneration did not mark it as preserved. It would need to be
recomputed which results in the legacy PM to throw away all previous
SCoP analysis.
This also changes the implementation of ScopPass::getAnalysisUsage to
not unconditionally preserve all passes, but only those needed to be
preserved by any SCoP pass (at least when using the legacy PM). This
allows invalidating DependenceInfo (and IslAstInfo) in case the pass
would cause them to change (e.g. OpTree, DeLICM, MaximalArrayExpansion)
JSONImporter should also invalidate the DependenceInfo. In this patch
it marks DependenceInfo as preserved anyway because some regression
tests depend on it.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37010
llvm-svn: 311888
In cases where the entry block of a scop was not contained in a loop that was
part of the scop region and at the same time there was a loop surrounding the
scop, we missed to count the loops in the scop and consequently did not consider
the scop profitable. We correct this by only moving to the loop parent, in case
the current loop is loop contained in the scop.
This increases the number of loops in COSMO which we assume to be profitable
from 3974 to 4981.
llvm-svn: 311863
Whether a partial write is tautological/unsatisfiable not only
depends on the access domain, but also on the domain covered
by its node in the AST.
In the example below, there are two instances of Stmt_cond_false. It may have a partial write access that is not executed in instance Stmt_cond_false(0).
for (int c0 = 0; c0 < tmp5; c0 += 1) {
Stmt_for_body344(c0);
if (tmp5 >= c0 + 2)
Stmt_cond_false(c0);
Stmt_cond_end(c0);
}
if (tmp5 <= 0) {
Stmt_for_body344(0);
Stmt_cond_false(0);
Stmt_cond_end(0);
}
Isl cannot derive a subscript for an array element that is never accessed.
This caused an error in that no subscript expression has been generated
in IslNodeBuilder::createNewAccesses, but BlockGenerator expected one
to exist because there is an execution of that write, just not in that
ast node.
Fixed by instead of determining whether the access domain is empty,
inspect whether isl generated a constant "false" ast expression in
the current ast node.
This should fix a compiler crash of the aosp buildbot.
llvm-svn: 311663
This is a stylistic change to make the function a little more readable.
Also add a debug print to show what instruction contains a use of a
function we don't understand in the kernel.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37058
llvm-svn: 311648
Summary:
This patch comes directly after https://reviews.llvm.org/D34982 which allows fully indexed expansion of MemoryKind::Array. This patch allows expansion for MemoryKind::Value and MemoryKind::PHI.
MemoryKind::Value seems to be working with no majors modifications of D34982. A test case has been added. Unfortunatly, no "run time" checks can be done for now because as @Meinersbur explains in a comment on D34982, DependenceInfo need to be cleared and reset to take expansion into account in the remaining part of the Polly pipeline. There is no way to do that in Polly for now.
MemoryKind::PHI is not working. Test case is in place, but not working. To expand MemoryKind::Array, we expand first the write and then after the reads. For MemoryKind::PHI, the idea of the current implementation is to exchange the "roles" of the read and write and expand first the read according to its domain and after the writes.
But with this strategy, I still encounter the problem of union_map in new access map.
For example with the following source code (source code of the test case) :
```
void mse(double A[Ni], double B[Nj]) {
int i,j;
double tmp = 6;
for (i = 0; i < Ni; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j<Nj; j++) {
tmp = tmp + 2;
}
B[i] = tmp;
}
}
```
Polly gives us the following statements and memory accesses :
```
Statements {
Stmt_for_body
Domain :=
{ Stmt_for_body[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 9999 };
Schedule :=
{ Stmt_for_body[i0] -> [i0, 0, 0] };
ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1]
{ Stmt_for_body[i0] -> MemRef_tmp_04__phi[] };
MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1]
{ Stmt_for_body[i0] -> MemRef_tmp_11__phi[] };
Instructions {
%tmp.04 = phi double [ 6.000000e+00, %entry.split ], [ %add.lcssa, %for.end ]
}
Stmt_for_inc
Domain :=
{ Stmt_for_inc[i0, i1] : 0 <= i0 <= 9999 and 0 <= i1 <= 9999 };
Schedule :=
{ Stmt_for_inc[i0, i1] -> [i0, 1, i1] };
MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1]
{ Stmt_for_inc[i0, i1] -> MemRef_tmp_11__phi[] };
ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1]
{ Stmt_for_inc[i0, i1] -> MemRef_tmp_11__phi[] };
MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1]
{ Stmt_for_inc[i0, i1] -> MemRef_add_lcssa__phi[] };
Instructions {
%tmp.11 = phi double [ %tmp.04, %for.body ], [ %add, %for.inc ]
%add = fadd double %tmp.11, 2.000000e+00
%exitcond = icmp ne i32 %inc, 10000
}
Stmt_for_end
Domain :=
{ Stmt_for_end[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 9999 };
Schedule :=
{ Stmt_for_end[i0] -> [i0, 2, 0] };
MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1]
{ Stmt_for_end[i0] -> MemRef_tmp_04__phi[] };
ReadAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 1]
{ Stmt_for_end[i0] -> MemRef_add_lcssa__phi[] };
MustWriteAccess := [Reduction Type: NONE] [Scalar: 0]
{ Stmt_for_end[i0] -> MemRef_B[i0] };
Instructions {
%add.lcssa = phi double [ %add, %for.inc ]
store double %add.lcssa, double* %arrayidx, align 8
%exitcond5 = icmp ne i64 %indvars.iv.next, 10000
}
}
```
and the following dependences :
```
{ Stmt_for_inc[i0, 9999] -> Stmt_for_end[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 9999;
Stmt_for_inc[i0, i1] -> Stmt_for_inc[i0, 1 + i1] : 0 <= i0 <= 9999 and 0 <= i1 <= 9998;
Stmt_for_body[i0] -> Stmt_for_inc[i0, 0] : 0 <= i0 <= 9999;
Stmt_for_end[i0] -> Stmt_for_body[1 + i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 9998 }
```
When trying to expand this memory access :
```
{ Stmt_for_inc[i0, i1] -> MemRef_tmp_11__phi[] };
```
The new access map would look like this :
```
{ Stmt_for_inc[i0, 9999] -> MemRef_tmp_11__phi_exp[i0] : 0 <= i0 <= 9999; Stmt_for_inc[i0, i1] ->MemRef_tmp_11__phi_exp[i0, 1 + i1] : 0 <= i0 <= 9999 and 0 <= i1 <= 9998 }
```
The idea to implement the expansion for PHI access is an idea from @Meinersbur and I don't understand why my implementation does not work. I should have miss something in the understanding of the idea.
Contributed by: Nicolas Bonfante <nicolas.bonfante@gmail.com>
Reviewers: Meinersbur, simbuerg, bollu
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Subscribers: llvm-commits, pollydev, Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D36647
llvm-svn: 311619
Add statistics about
- Which optimizations are applied
- Number of loops in Scops at various stages
- Number of scalar/singleton writes at various stages representative
for scalar false dependencies
- Number of parallel loops
These will be useful to find regressions due to moving Polly further
down of LLVM's pass pipeline.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D37049
llvm-svn: 311553
Loop with zero iteration are, syntactically, loops. They have been
excluded from the loop counter even for the non-profitable counters.
This seems to be unintentially as the sentinel value of '0' minimal
iterations does exclude such loops.
Fix by never considering the iteration count when the sentinel
value of 0 is found.
This makes the recently added NumTotalLoops couter redundant
with NumLoopsOverall, which now is equivalent. Hence, NumTotalLoops
is removed as well.
Note: The test case 'ScopDetect/statistics.ll' effectively does not
check profitability, because -polly-process-unprofitable is passed
to all test cases.
llvm-svn: 311551
Michael Kruse