In gcc, -gsplit-dwarf is handled in gcc/gcc.c as a spec
(ASM_FINAL_SPEC): objcopy --extract-dwo + objcopy --strip-dwo. In
gcc/opts.c, -gsplit_dwarf has the same semantic of a -g. Except for the
availability of the external command 'objcopy', nothing precludes the
feature working on other ELF OSes. llvm doesn't use objcopy, so it doesn't
have to exclude other OSes.
llvm-svn: 357150
Summary:
We may try and re-import an EnumDecl while trying to complete it in IsStructuralMatch(...) specialization for EnumDecl. This change mirrors a similar fix for the specialization for RecordDecl.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59845
llvm-svn: 357100
This fixes a false positive on the following, where st is configured to have
different sizes based on some preprocessor logic:
if (sizeof(buf) == sizeof(*st))
memcpy(&buf, st, sizeof(*st));
llvm-svn: 357041
MarkVarDeclODRUsed indirectly calls captureInBlock, which creates a copy
expression. The copy expression is insulated in it's own
ExpressionEvaluationContext, so it saves, mutates, and restores MaybeODRUseExprs
as CleanupVarDeclMarking is iterating through it, leading to a crash. Fix this
by iterating through a local copy of MaybeODRUseExprs.
rdar://47493525
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59670
llvm-svn: 357040
FileManager constructs a VFS in its constructor if it isn't passed one,
and there's no way to reset it. Make that contract clear by returning a
reference from its accessor.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59388
llvm-svn: 357038
Remove CompilerInstance::VirtualFileSystem and
CompilerInstance::setVirtualFileSystem, instead relying on the VFS in
the FileManager. CompilerInstance and its clients already went to some
trouble to make these match. Now they are guaranteed to match.
As part of this, I added a VFS parameter (defaults to nullptr) to
CompilerInstance::createFileManager, to avoid repeating construction
logic in clients that just wanted to customize the VFS.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59377
llvm-svn: 357037
A bunch of macros use the same variable name, and since CMake macros
don't get their own scope, the value persists across macro invocations,
and we can end up exporting targets which shouldn't be exported. Clear
the variable before each use to avoid this.
Converting these macros to functions would also help, since it would
avoid the variable leaking into its parent scope, and that's something I
plan to follow up with. It won't fully address the problem, however,
since functions still inherit variables from their parent scopes, so if
someone in the parent scope just happened to use the same variable name
we'd still have the same issue.
llvm-svn: 357036
Since AArch64 has default outlining behaviour, we need to make sure that
-mno-outline is actually passed along to the linker in this case. Otherwise,
it will run by default on minsize functions even when -mno-outline is specified.
Also fix the darwin-ld test for this, which wasn't actually doing anything.
llvm-svn: 357031
Summary:
This option `AllowShortLambdasOnASingleLine` similar to the other `AllowShort*` options, but applied to C++ lambdas.
Reviewers: djasper, klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57687
llvm-svn: 357027
The RISC-V assembler needs the target ABI because it defines a flag of the ELF
file, as described in [1].
Make clang (the driver) to pass the target ABI to -cc1as in exactly the same
way it does for -cc1.
Currently -cc1as knows about -target-abi but is not handling it. Handle it and
pass it to the MC layer via MCTargetOptions.
[1] https://github.com/riscv/riscv-elf-psabi-doc/blob/master/riscv-elf.md#file-header
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59298
llvm-svn: 356981
We want to distribute only a single archive so -lc++ does the right
thing and users don't have to explicitly link -lc++abi and -lunwind.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59803
llvm-svn: 356970
r356634 didn't fix all the problems caused by r356222 - even though simple
constructors involving transparent init-list expressions are now evaluated
precisely, many more complicated constructors aren't, for other reasons.
The attached test case is an example of a constructor that will never be
evaluated precisely - simply because there isn't a constructor there (instead,
the program invokes run-time undefined behavior by returning without a return
statement that should have constructed the return value).
Fix another part of the problem for such situations: evaluate transparent
init-list expressions transparently, so that to avoid creating ill-formed
"transparent" nonloc::CompoundVals.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59622
llvm-svn: 356969
The intention is to add metadata to direct call sites of functions
marked with __declspec(allocator), which will ultimately result in some
S_HEAPALLOCSITE debug info records when emitting codeview.
This is a piece of PR38491
llvm-svn: 356964
Bail-out of CheckArrayAccess when the types of the base expression before
and after eventual casts are dependent. We will get another chance to check
for array bounds during instantiation. Fixes PR41087.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59776
Reviewed By: efriedma
llvm-svn: 356957
We can't (don't want to) honor the same set of "-fuse-ld" flags with
WebAssembly since the ELF linkers (ld.lld, ld.gnu, etc) don't work with
wasm object files.
Instead we implement our own linker finding logic, similar or other
non-ELF platforms like MSVC.
We've had a few issues with CLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER overriding the
WebAssembly linker which doesn't make sense since there is no generic
linker that can handle WebAssembly today.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59743
llvm-svn: 356953
Summary:
SExprBuilder::translateDeclRefExpr was only looking at FunctionDecl and not also looking at ObjCMethodDecl. It should consider both because the attributes can be used on Objective-C as well.
<rdar://problem/48941331>
Reviewers: dexonsmith, erik.pilkington
Subscribers: jkorous, jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59523
llvm-svn: 356940
Summary:
Revision r356575 had the unfortunate consequence that now clang-format never
detects an ObjC call expression after `&&`.
This patch tries harder to distinguish between C++17 structured bindings and
ObjC call expressions and adds a few regression tests.
Reviewers: klimek
Reviewed By: klimek
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59774
llvm-svn: 356928
The various CorrectionCandidateCallbacks are currently heap-allocated
unconditionally. This was needed because of delayed typo correction.
However these allocations represent currently 15.4% of all allocations
(number of allocations) when parsing all of Boost (!), mostly because
of ParseCastExpression, ParseStatementOrDeclarationAfterAttrtibutes
and isCXXDeclarationSpecifier. Note that all of these callback objects
are small. Let's not do this.
Instead initially allocate the callback on the stack, and only do a
heap allocation if we are going to do some typo correction. Do this by:
1. Adding a clone function to each callback, which will do a polymorphic
clone of the callback. This clone function is required to be implemented
by every callback (of which there is a fair amount). Make sure this is
the case by making it pure virtual.
2. Use this clone function when we are going to try to correct a typo.
This additionally cut the time of -fsyntax-only on all of Boost by 0.5%
(not that much, but still something). No functional changes intended.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58827
Reviewed By: rnk
llvm-svn: 356925
This reverts commit r356835. This patch causes a regression, see the
test below:
verifyFormat("// Detached comment\n\n"
"// Leading comment\n"
"syntax = \"proto2\"; // trailing comment\n\n"
"// in foo.bar package\n"
"package foo.bar; // foo.bar package\n");
llvm-svn: 356912
For backwards compatibility we allow alternative spelling of address
spaces - 'private', 'local', 'global', 'constant', 'generic'.
In order to accept 'private' correctly, parsing has been changed to
understand different use cases - access specifier vs address space.
Fixes PR40707 and PR41011!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59603
llvm-svn: 356888
Summary:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076 added a new coroutine error that
prevented users from using 'co_await' or 'co_yield' within a exception
handler. However, it was reverted in https://reviews.llvm.org/rC356774
because it caused a regression in nested scopes in C++ catch statements,
as documented by https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
The issue was due to an incorrect use of a `clang::ParseScope`. To fix:
1. Add a regression test for catch statement parsing that mimics the bug
report from https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41171.
2. Re-apply the coroutines error patch from
https://reviews.llvm.org/D59076, but this time with the correct
ParseScope behavior.
Reviewers: GorNishanov, tks2103, rsmith, riccibruno, jbulow
Reviewed By: riccibruno
Subscribers: EricWF, jdoerfert, lewissbaker, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59752
llvm-svn: 356865
Summary:
These are all implemented by icc as well.
I made bit_scan_forward/reverse forward to the __bsfd/__bsrq since we also have
__bsfq/__bsrq.
Note, when lzcnt is enabled the bsr intrinsics generates lzcnt+xor instead of bsr.
Reviewers: RKSimon, spatel
Subscribers: cfe-commits, llvm-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59682
llvm-svn: 356848
Summary:
`dladdr` is not available on AIX. Similar functionality is presented
through `loadquery`. This patch replaces a use of `dladdr` with a
version based on `loadquery`.
Reviewers: sfertile, xingxue, jasonliu
Reviewed By: xingxue
Subscribers: jsji, lhames, majnemer, asb, arphaman, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59233
llvm-svn: 356843
Summary:
These changes were corrected directly in ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst (llvm-svn: 350192 and llvm-svn: 351976) but these sections can be produced automatically using `dump_format_style.py` so sync the corresponding doc comments in `Format.h` as well.
Patch by Ronald Wampler
Reviewers: eugene, sylvestre.ledru, djasper
Reviewed By: sylvestre.ledru
Subscribers: jdoerfert, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58186
llvm-svn: 356842
Summary:
Top-level "package" and "import" statements should generally be kept on one
line, for all languages.
Reviewers: sammccall, krasimir, MyDeveloperDay
Reviewed By: MyDeveloperDay
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59627
Patch By: dchai (Donald Chai)
llvm-svn: 356835
Summary:
This eliminates a linker error the user might otherwise see about how
using the 'atomics' feature requires --shared-memory.
Reviewers: sbc100, aheejin
Subscribers: dschuff, jgravelle-google, sunfish, jfb, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D59721
llvm-svn: 356817
Just as as llvm IR supports explicitly specifying numeric value ids
for instructions, and emits them by default in textual output, now do
the same for blocks.
This is a slightly incompatible change in the textual IR format.
Previously, llvm would parse numeric labels as string names. E.g.
define void @f() {
br label %"55"
55:
ret void
}
defined a label *named* "55", even without needing to be quoted, while
the reference required quoting. Now, if you intend a block label which
looks like a value number to be a name, you must quote it in the
definition too (e.g. `"55":`).
Previously, llvm would print nameless blocks only as a comment, and
would omit it if there was no predecessor. This could cause confusion
for readers of the IR, just as unnamed instructions did prior to the
addition of "%5 = " syntax, back in 2008 (PR2480).
Now, it will always print a label for an unnamed block, with the
exception of the entry block. (IMO it may be better to print it for
the entry-block as well. However, that requires updating many more
tests.)
Thus, the following is supported, and is the canonical printing:
define i32 @f(i32, i32) {
%3 = add i32 %0, %1
br label %4
4:
ret i32 %3
}
New test cases covering this behavior are added, and other tests
updated as required.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58548
llvm-svn: 356789
dynamic_allocators.
According to the OpenMP 5.0, 2.11.3 allocate Directive, Restrictions,
allocate directives that appear in a target region must specify an
allocator clause unless a requires directive with the dynamic_allocators
clause is present in the same compilation unit. Patch adds a check for a
presence of the requires directive with the dynamic_allocators clause.
llvm-svn: 356758
Fangrui Song