Summary:
I think we would be better off with tests explicitly specifying the
language mode. Right now Lang_C means C99, but reads as "any C version",
or as "unspecified C version".
I also changed '-std=c++98' to '-std=c++03' because they are aliases (so
there is no difference in practice), because Clang implements C++03
rules in practice, and because 03 makes a nice sortable progression
between 03, 11, 14, 17, 20.
Reviewers: shafik, hlopko
Reviewed By: hlopko
Subscribers: jfb, martong, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81000
Summary: Only for the readability reasons.
Reviewers: gribozavr
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76120
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
We do not currently track the source locations for exception specifications such
that their source range can be queried through the AST. This leads to trying to
write more complex code to determine the source range for uses like FixItHints
(see D18575 for an example). In addition to use within tools like clang-tidy, I
think this information may become more important to track as exception
specifications become more integrated into the type system.
Patch by Don Hinton.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: malcolm.parsons, sbarzowski, alexfh, hintonda, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D20428
llvm-svn: 291771
Summary:
clang-tidy's modernize-use-auto check uses the SourceRange of a
TypeLoc when replacing the type with auto.
This was producing the wrong result for multi-token builtin types
like long long:
-long long *ll = new long long();
+auto long *ll = new long long();
Reviewers: alexfh, hokein, rsmith, Prazek, aaron.ballman
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25363
llvm-svn: 284885
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20744
struct A {
A() = default;
};
Previously the source range of the declaration of A ended at the ')'. It should
include the '= default' part as well. The same for '= delete'.
Note: this will break one of the clang-tidy fixers, which is going to be
addessed in a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8465
llvm-svn: 233028
encodes the canonical rules for LLVM's style. I noticed this had drifted
quite a bit when cleaning up LLVM, so wanted to clean up Clang as well.
llvm-svn: 198686
correctly in the presence of qualified types.
(I had to change the unittest because it was trying to cast a
QualifiedTypeLoc to TemplateSpecializationTypeLoc.)
llvm-svn: 183563
Vy Nguyen