The basic idea to this is that a) having a single canonical type makes CSE easier, and b) many of our transforms are inconsistent about which types we end up with based on visit order.
I'm restricting this to constants as for non-constants, we'd have to decide whether the simplicity was worth extra instructions. For constants, there are no extra instructions.
We chose the canonical type as i64 arbitrarily. We might consider changing this to something else in the future if we have cause.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D115387
This reverts 61ddc3d3db to reapply
91eda9c30f after fixing the " |& "
causing failures on windows.
Change-Id: Ib646c803b2274f0f24f9a8932de7aa97003529c5
We found issues with a number of intrinsics when building them with
C++, so it makes sense to guard these tests with some extra RUN lines
to build the tests in C++ mode.
This patch enables the following macros when their corresponding
target attributes are set:
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE (+sve)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2 (+sve2)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_AES (+sve2-aes)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_BITPERM (+sve2-bitperm)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_SHA3 (+sve2-sha3)
__ARM_FEATURE_SVE2_SM4 (+sve2-sm4)
This implies that the base SVE and SVE2 ACLE (00bet2) are now feature
complete, meaning that all intrinsics are implemented in LLVM and Clang.
Disclaimer:
To implement the ACLE we have had to fix up many parts of LLVM to make it
support scalable vectors. We have also used many target-specific intrinsics
to reduce reliance on parts of LLVM where we know scalable vectors may
not yet be handled properly (e.g. some transformation might drop the
'scalable' flag on a vector type). While we've done a best effort with
the limited testing that is available to us, we're still working to improve the
stability of the implementation. Additionally, Clang may print warnings
that code may have miscompiled. We find this often to be a false alarm
where the wrong interfaces have been used in LLVM and where resulting
code is not actually incorrect. However, this warrants a bug report
and investigation. If you find any bugs or issues, please raise them on
bugs.llvm.org and let us know!
Reviewers: rengolin, efriedma, david-arm, SjoerdMeijer
Reviewed By: SjoerdMeijer
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81725
Philip Reames