This patch introduces a LLDB_SCOPED_TIMER macro to hide the needlessly
repetitive creation of scoped timers in LLDB. It's similar to the
LLDB_LOG(F) macro.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D93663
When the architecture from the returned plist differs from the
architecture lldb will pick when loading the binary file, lldb will
reject the binary as not matching. We are working with UUID's in
this case, so an architecture is not disambiguating anything; it
just opens this possibility for failing to load the specified binary.
Stop reading the architecture from the plist.
<rdar://problem/71612561>
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D92692
Part 2 of a fix for JITed code debugging. This has been a regression from 5.0 to 6.0 and it's still reproducible on current master: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36209 Part 1 was D61611 a while ago.
The in-memory object files we obtain from JITLoaderGDB are not yet relocated. It looks like this used to happen on the LLDB side and my guess is that it broke with D38142. (However, it's hard to tell because the whole thing was broken already due to the bug in part 1.) The patch moved relocation resolution to a later point in time and didn't apply it to in-memory objects. I am not aware of any reason why we wouldn't resolve relocations per-se, so I made it unconditional here. On Debian, it fixes the bug for me and all tests in `check-lldb` are still fine.
Reviewed By: labath
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90769
Sometimes builds will fail with errors like:
```
In file included from /build/external/llvm-project/lldb/source/Symbol/SwiftASTContext.cpp:52:
In file included from /build/external/swift/include/swift/IRGen/Linking.h:22:
In file included from /build/external/swift/include/swift/SIL/SILFunction.h:24:
In file included from /build/external/swift/include/swift/SIL/SILBasicBlock.h:23:
In file included from /build/external/swift/include/swift/SIL/SILInstruction.h:21:
In file included from /build/external/swift/include/swift/AST/Builtins.h:24:
**/build/external/llvm-project/llvm/include/llvm/IR/Attributes.h:74:14: fatal error: 'llvm/IR/Attributes.inc' file not found**
**^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~**
```
This change ensures the `Attributes.inc` file is generated before building `SwiftASTContext.cpp`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D90857
Depends on D89408.
This diff finally implements trace decoding!
The current interface is
$ trace load /path/to/trace/session/file.json
$ thread trace dump instructions
thread #1: tid = 3842849, total instructions = 22
[ 0] 0x40052d
[ 1] 0x40052d
...
[19] 0x400521
$ # simply enter, which is a repeat command
[20] 0x40052d
[21] 0x400529
...
This doesn't do any disassembly, which will be done in the next diff.
Changes:
- Added an IntelPTDecoder class, that is a wrapper for libipt, which is the actual library that performs the decoding.
- Added TraceThreadDecoder class that decodes traces and memoizes the result to avoid repeating the decoding step.
- Added a DecodedThread class, which represents the output from decoding and that for the time being only stores the list of reconstructed instructions. Later it'll contain the function call hierarchy, which will enable reconstructing backtraces.
- Added basic APIs for accessing the trace in Trace.h:
- GetInstructionCount, which counts the number of instructions traced for a given thread
- IsTraceFailed, which returns an Error if decoding a thread failed
- ForEachInstruction, which iterates on the instructions traced for a given thread, concealing the internal storage of threads, as plug-ins can decide to generate the instructions on the fly or to store them all in a vector, like I do.
- DumpTraceInstructions was updated to print the instructions or show an error message if decoding was impossible.
- Tests included
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D89283
We were returning the default constructed unique_pointer from
TypeSystem.h for which the compiler does not have a definition. Move the
implementation into the cpp file.
With a large dSYM over a slow home connection, the two minute timeout
would sometimes be exceeded, and we haven't seen instances of a
long timeout causing people any problems, so we're bumping it up.
640 seconds ought to be enough for anyone.
<rdar://problem/67759526>
This is a polymorphic class, copying it is a bad idea.
This was not a problem because most classes inheriting from it were
deleting their copy operations themselves. However, this enables us to
delete those explicit deletions, and ensure noone forgets to add them in
the future.
This reverts commit f775fe5964.
I fixed a return type error in the original patch that was causing a test failure.
Also added a REQUIRES: python to the shell test so we'll skip this for
people who build lldb w/o Python.
Also added another test for the error printing.
The function was returning an incorrect (empty) value on the first
invocation. Given that this only affected the first invocation, this
bug/typo went mostly unaffected. DW_AT_const_value were particularly
badly affected by this as the GetByteSize call is
SymbolFileDWARF::ParseVariableDIE is likely to be the first call of this
function, and its effects cannot be undone by retrying.
Depends on D86348.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86436
Update the "image show-unwind" command output to show if the function
being shown is listed as a user-setting or platform trap handler.
Update the individual UnwindPlan dumps to show whether the unwind plan
is registered as a trap handler.
When replaying a reproducer captured from a core file, we always use
dsymForUUID for the kernel binary. When enabled, we also use it to find
kexts. Since these files are already contained in the reproducer,
there's no reason to call out to an external tool. If the tool returns a
different result, e.g. because the dSYM got garbage collected, it will
break reproducer replay. The SymbolFileProvider solves the issue by
mapping UUIDs to module and symbol paths in the reproducer.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D86389
This parameter isn't used anywhere in LLDB nor the Swift downstream branch. It
also doesn't really fit into the TypeSystem APIs that usually don't return
additional related functionality via some output parameters. Also the
implementations already states that the calculated value there is wrong.
Let's remove it. If we need this functionality at some point then Swift's much
nicer `GetByteStride` function seems like the way to go.
Reviewed By: aprantl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84299
There are two implementations for `TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage`
which are both identical beside one taking a `Module` and one taking a `Target`
(and then passing that argument to the `TypeSystem::CreateInstance` function).
This merges both implementations into one function with a lambda that wraps the
different calls to `TypeSystem::CreateInstance`.
Reviewed By: #lldb, JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D82537
This patch has no effect for C and C++. In more dynamic languages,
such as Objective-C and Swift GetByteSize() needs to call into the
language runtime, so it's important to pass one in where possible. My
primary motivation for this is some work I'm doing on the Swift
branch, however, it looks like we are also seeing warnings in
Objective-C that this may resolve. Everything in the SymbolFile
hierarchy still passes in nullptrs, because we don't have an execution
context in SymbolFile, since SymbolFile transcends processes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D84267
These were found by Clang's new -Wsuggest-override.
This patch doesn't touch any code in unittests/, since much of it intentionally doesn't use override to avoid massive warning spam from -Winconsistent-missing-override due to the use of MOCK_*** macros.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83847
Summary:
This patch extends the ModuleSpec class to include a
DataBufferSP which contains the module data. If this
data is provided, LLDB won't try to hit the filesystem
to create the Module, but use only the data stored in
the ModuleSpec.
Reviewers: labath, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, MaskRay, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83512
Summary:
DWARF-parsing methods in SymbolFileDWARF which update module state
typically take the module lock. ParseCallEdgesInFunction doesn't do
this, but higher-level locking within lldb::Function (which owns the
storage for parsed call edges) is necessary.
The lack of locking could explain some as-of-yet unreproducible crashes
which occur in Function::GetTailCallingEdges(). In these crashes, the
`m_call_edges` vector is non-empty but contains a nullptr, which
shouldn't be possible. (If this vector is non-empty, it _must_ contain a
non-null unique_ptr.)
This may address rdar://55622443 and rdar://65119458.
Reviewers: jasonmolenda, friss, jingham
Subscribers: aprantl, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D83359
Summary:
The way that the support for the GNU dialect of tail call frames was
implemented in D80519 meant that the were reporting very bogus PC values
which pointed into the middle of an instruction: the -1 trick is
necessary for the address to resolve to the right function, but we
should still be reporting a more realistic PC value -- I say "realistic"
and not "real", because it's very debatable what should be the correct
PC value for frames like this.
This patch achieves that my moving the -1 from SymbolFileDWARF into the
stack frame computation code. The idea is that SymbolFileDWARF will
merely report whether it has provided an address of the instruction
after the tail call, or the address of the call instruction itself. The
StackFrameList machinery uses this information to set the "behaves like
frame zero" property of the artificial frames (the main thing this flag
does is it controls the -1 subtraction when looking up the function
address).
This required a moderate refactor of the CallEdge class, because it was
implicitly assuming that edges pointing after the call were real calls
and those pointing the the call insn were tail calls. The class now
carries this information explicitly -- it carries three mostly
independent pieces of information:
- an address of interest in the caller
- a bit saying whether this address points to the call insn or after it
- whether this is a tail call
Reviewers: vsk, dblaikie
Subscribers: aprantl, mgrang, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D81010
The llvm DWARFExpression dump is nearly identical, but better -- for
example it does print a spurious space after zero-argument expressions.
Some parts of our code (variable locations) have been already switched
to llvm-based expression dumping. This switches the remainder: unwind
plans and some unit tests.
Summary: We are not doing this very often, but sometimes it's convenient when I can just << ConstStrings into llvm::errs() during testing.
Reviewers: labath, JDevlieghere
Reviewed By: labath, JDevlieghere
Subscribers: JDevlieghere
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D80310
This patch threads an lldb::DescriptionLevel through the typesystem to
allow dumping the full Clang AST (level=verbose) of any lldb::Type in
addition to the human-readable source description (default
level=full). This type dumping interface is currently not exposed
through the SBAPI.
The application is to let lldb-test dump the clang AST of search
results. I need this to test lazy type completion of clang types in
subsequent patches.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D78329
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
1;95;0csets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
This reapplies the previously reverted commit, but without support for
ClassTemplateSpecializations, which I'm going to look into separately.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
This reimplements Symbols::FindSymbolFileInBundle to use the VFS-aware
recursive directory iterator. This is needed for reproducer replay.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D77337
Types that came from a Clang module are nested in DW_TAG_module tags
in DWARF. This patch recreates the Clang module hierarchy in LLDB and
sets the owning module information accordingly. My primary motivation
is to facilitate looking up per-module APINotes for individual
declarations, but this likely also has other applications.
rdar://problem/59634380
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D75488
Reland with changes: the test modified in this change originally failed
on a Debian/x86_64 builder, and I suspect the cause was that lldb looked
up the line location for an artificial frame by subtracting 1 from the
frame's address. For artificial frames, the subtraction must not happen
because the address is already exact.
---
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial
frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail)
calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided
by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
This reverts commit 6905394d15. The
changed test is failing on Debian/x86_64, possibly because lldb is
subtracting an offset from the DW_AT_call_pc address used for the
artificial frame:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/lldb-x86_64-debian/builds/7171/steps/test/logs/stdio
/home/worker/lldb-x86_64-debian/lldb-x86_64-debian/llvm-project/lldb/test/API/functionalities/tail_call_frames/unambiguous_sequence/main.cpp:6:17: error: CHECK-NEXT: expected string not found in input
// CHECK-NEXT: frame #1: 0x{{[0-9a-f]+}} a.out`func3() at main.cpp:14:3 [opt] [artificial]
^
<stdin>:3:2: note: scanning from here
frame #1: 0x0000000000401127 a.out`func3() at main.cpp:13:4 [opt] [artificial]
lldb currently guesses the address to use when creating an artificial
frame (i.e., a frame constructed by determining the sequence of (tail)
calls which must have happened).
Guessing the address creates problems -- use the actual address provided
by the DW_AT_call_pc attribute instead.
Depends on D76336.
rdar://60307600
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76337
Badly-written code can combine an unrelated TypeSystem and opaque type
pointer into a CompilerType. This is particularly an issue in
swift-lldb. This patch adds an assertion mechanism that catches these
kinds of mistakes early. Because this is an assertion-only code path
there is not cost for release builds.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D76011
Some functions in this file only use the "target" component of an
execution context. Adjust the argument lists to reflect that.
This avoids some defensive null checks and simplifies most of the
callers.
Summary:
All of our lookup APIs either use `CompilerDeclContext &` or `CompilerDeclContext *` semi-randomly it seems.
This leads to us constantly converting between those two types (and doing nullptr checks when going from
pointer to reference). It also leads to the confusing situation where we have two possible ways to express
that we don't have a CompilerDeclContex: either a nullptr or an invalid CompilerDeclContext (aka a default
constructed CompilerDeclContext).
This moves all APIs to use references and gets rid of all the nullptr checks and conversions.
Reviewers: labath, mib, shafik
Reviewed By: labath, shafik
Subscribers: shafik, arphaman, abidh, JDevlieghere, lldb-commits
Tags: #lldb
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D74607
Jonas Devlieghere