Similar was already done for several other shuffles in this function.
The test changes are because the old code used explicity zeroing for elements that could have been undef.
While I was here I also changed other shuffle vectors in the same function to use the same input twice instead of creating UNDEF nodes. getVectorShuffle can create the UNDEF for us.
llvm-svn: 294130
This is a tiny patch with a big pile of test changes.
This partially fixes PR27885:
https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27885
My motivating case looks like this:
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm1 = xmm1[0,1,0,2]
- vpshufd {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2,2,3]
- vpblendw {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,1,2,3],xmm1[4,5,6,7]
+ vshufps {{.*#+}} xmm0 = xmm0[0,2],xmm1[0,2]
And this happens several times in the diffs. For chips with domain-crossing penalties,
the instruction count and size reduction should usually overcome any potential
domain-crossing penalty due to using an FP op in a sequence of int ops. For chips such
as recent Intel big cores and Atom, there is no domain-crossing penalty for shufps, so
using shufps is a pure win.
So the test case diffs all appear to be improvements except one test in
vector-shuffle-combining.ll where we miss an opportunity to use a shift to generate
zero elements and one test in combine-sra.ll where multiple uses prevent the expected
shuffle combining.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D27692
llvm-svn: 289837
This fixes a regression introduced by revision 268094.
Revision 268094 added the following dag combine rule:
// trunc (shl x, K) -> shl (trunc x), K => K < vt.size / 2
That rule converts a truncate of a shift-by-constant into a shift of a truncated
value. We do this only if the shift count is less than half the size in bits of
the truncated value (K < vt.size / 2).
The problem is that the constraint on the shift count is incorrect, so the rule
doesn't work well in some cases involving vector types. The combine rule should
have been written instead like this:
// trunc (shl x, K) -> shl (trunc x), K => K < vt.getScalarSizeInBits()
Basically, if K is smaller than the "scalar size in bits" of the truncated value
then we know that by "sinking" the truncate into the operand of the shift we
would never accidentally make the shift undefined.
This patch fixes the check on the shift count, and adds test cases to make sure
that we don't regress the behavior.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D24154
llvm-svn: 280482
As discussed on PR28136, lowerShuffleAsRepeatedMaskAndLanePermute was attempting to match repeated masks at the 128-bit level and then permute the resultant lanes at the 128-bit (AVX1) or 64-bit (AVX2) sub-lane level.
This change allows us to create the repeated masks at the sub-lane level (and then concat them together to create a 128-bit repeated mask) and then select which sub-lane to permute. This has no effect on the AVX1 codegen.
Fixes PR28136.
llvm-svn: 275543
Craig Topper