Trivial fix for two testcases. When Polly isn't linked into opt,
independent of whether it's built in-tree or not, these testcases forget
to load the appropriate library.
Contributed-by: Philip Pfaffe <philip.pfaffe@gmail.com>
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D31596
llvm-svn: 299357
In case LLVM pointers are annotated with !dereferencable attributes/metadata
or LLVM can look at the allocation from which a pointer is derived, we can know
that dereferencing pointers is safe and can be done unconditionally. We use this
information to proof certain pointers as save to hoist and then hoist them
unconditionally.
llvm-svn: 297375
Only when load-hoisted we can be sure the base pointer is invariant
during the SCoP's execution. Most of the time it would be added to
the required hoists for the alias checks anyway, except with
-polly-ignore-aliasing, -polly-use-runtime-alias-checks=0 or if
AliasAnalysis is already sure it doesn't alias with anything
(for instance if there is no other pointer to alias with).
Two more parts in Polly assume that this load-hoisting took place:
- setNewAccessRelation() which contains an assert which tests this.
- BlockGenerator which would use to the base ptr from the original
code if not load-hoisted (if the access expression is regenerated)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D30694
llvm-svn: 297195
There is no point in optimizing unreachable code, hence our test cases should
always return.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust on the presence of
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297158
These test cases should work in combination with
https://reviews.llvm.org/D12676, but became outdated over time. Update them
in preparation of discussions with Daniel Berlin on how to represent unreachable
in the post-dominator tree.
llvm-svn: 297157
There is no point in optimizing unreachable code, hence our test cases should
always return.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust on the presence of
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297150
There is no point in optimizing unreachable code, hence our test cases should
always return.
This commit is part of a series that makes Polly more robust on the presence of
unreachables.
llvm-svn: 297147
r296992 made ScalarEvolution's CompareValueComplexity less aggressive,
and that broke the polly test being fixed in this change. This change
explicitly bumps CompareValueComplexity in said test case to make it
pass.
Can someone from the polly team please can give me an idea on if this
case is important enough to have
scalar-evolution-max-value-compare-depth be 3 by default?
llvm-svn: 296994
These loads cannot be savely hoisted as the condition guarding the
non-affine region cannot be duplicated to also protect the hoisted load
later on. Today they are dropped in ScopInfo. By checking for this early, we
do not even try to model them and possibly can still optimize smaller regions
not containing this specific required-invariant load.
llvm-svn: 296744
Multi-disjunct access maps can easily result in inbound assumptions which
explode in case of many memory accesses and many parameters. This change reduces
compilation time of some larger kernel from over 15 minutes to less than 16
seconds.
Interesting is the test case test/ScopInfo/multidim_param_in_subscript.ll
which has a memory access
[n] -> { Stmt_for_body3[i0, i1] -> MemRef_A[i0, -1 + n - i1] }
which requires folding, but where only a single disjunct remains. We can still
model this test case even when only using limited memory folding.
For people only reading commit messages, here the comment that explains what
memory folding is:
To recover memory accesses with array size parameters in the subscript
expression we post-process the delinearization results.
We would normally recover from an access A[exp0(i) * N + exp1(i)] into an
array A[][N] the 2D access A[exp0(i)][exp1(i)]. However, another valid
delinearization is A[exp0(i) - 1][exp1(i) + N] which - depending on the
range of exp1(i) - may be preferrable. Specifically, for cases where we
know exp1(i) is negative, we want to choose the latter expression.
As we commonly do not have any information about the range of exp1(i),
we do not choose one of the two options, but instead create a piecewise
access function that adds the (-1, N) offsets as soon as exp1(i) becomes
negative. For a 2D array such an access function is created by applying
the piecewise map:
[i,j] -> [i, j] : j >= 0
[i,j] -> [i-1, j+N] : j < 0
After this patch we generate only the first case, except for situations where
we can proove the first case to be invalid and can consequently select the
second without introducing disjuncts.
llvm-svn: 296679
Without this simplification for a loop nest:
void foo(long n1_a, long n1_b, long n1_c, long n1_d,
long p1_b, long p1_c, long p1_d,
float A_1[][p1_b][p1_c][p1_d]) {
for (long i = 0; i < n1_a; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < n1_b; j++)
for (long k = 0; k < n1_c; k++)
for (long l = 0; l < n1_d; l++)
A_1[i][j][k][l] += i + j + k + l;
}
the assumption:
n1_a <= 0 or (n1_a > 0 and n1_b <= 0) or
(n1_a > 0 and n1_b > 0 and n1_c <= 0) or
(n1_a > 0 and n1_b > 0 and n1_c > 0 and n1_d <= 0) or
(n1_a > 0 and n1_b > 0 and n1_c > 0 and n1_d > 0 and
p1_b >= n1_b and p1_c >= n1_c and p1_d >= n1_d)
is taken rather than the simpler assumption:
p9_b >= n9_b and p9_c >= n9_c and p9_d >= n9_d.
The former is less strict, as it allows arbitrary values of p1_* in case, the
loop is not executed at all. However, in practice these precise constraints
explode when combined across different accesses and loops. For now it seems
to make more sense to take less precise, but more scalable constraints by
default. In case we find a practical example where more precise constraints
are needed, we can think about allowing such precise constraints in specific
situations where they help.
This change speeds up the new test case from taking very long (waited at least
a minute, but it probably takes a lot more) to below a second.
llvm-svn: 296456
Instead of counting the number of read-only accesses, we now count the number of
distinct read-only array references when checking if a run-time alias check
may be too complex. The run-time alias check is quadratic in the number of
base pointers, not the number of accesses.
Before this change we accidentally skipped SPEC's lbm test case.
llvm-svn: 295567
Trying to fold such kind of dimensions will result in a division by zero,
which crashes the compiler. As such arrays are likely to invalidate the
scop anyhow (but are not illegal in LLVM-IR), there is no point in trying
to optimize the array layout. Hence, we just avoid the folding of
constant dimensions of size zero.
llvm-svn: 295415
Before this change wrapping range metadata resulted in exponential growth of
the context, which made context construction of large scops very slow. Instead,
we now just do not model the range information precisely, in case the number
of disjuncts in the context has already reached a certain limit.
llvm-svn: 295360
Commit r230230 introduced the use of range metadata to derive bounds for
parameters, instead of just looking at the type of the parameter. As part of
this commit support for wrapping ranges was added, where the lower bound of a
parameter is larger than the upper bound:
{ 255 < p || p < 0 }
However, at the same time, for wrapping ranges support for adding bounds given
by the size of the containing type has acidentally been dropped. As a result,
the range of the parameters was not guaranteed to be bounded any more. This
change makes sure we always add the bounds given by the size of the type and
then additionally add bounds based on signed wrapping, if available. For a
parameter p with a type size of 32 bit, the valid range is then:
{ -2147483648 <= p <= 2147483647 and (255 < p or p < 0) }
llvm-svn: 295349
When deriving the range of valid values of a scalar evolution expression might
be a range [12, 8), where the upper bound is smaller than the lower bound and
where the range is expected to possibly wrap around. We theoretically could
model such a range as a union of two non-wrapping ranges, but do not do this
as of yet. Instead, we just do not derive any bounds. Before this change,
we could have obtained bounds where the maximal possible value is strictly
smaller than the minimal possible value, which is incorrect and also caused
assertions during scop modeling.
llvm-svn: 294891
Before this change we created an additional reload in the copy of the incoming
block of a PHI node to reload the incoming value, even though the necessary
value has already been made available by the normally generated scalar loads.
In this change, we drop the code that generates this redundant reload and
instead just reuse the scalar value already available.
Besides making the generated code slightly cleaner, this change also makes sure
that scalar loads go through the normal logic, which means they can be remapped
(e.g. to array slots) and corresponding code is generated to load from the
remapped location. Without this change, the original scalar load at the
beginning of the non-affine region would have been remapped, but the redundant
scalar load would continue to load from the old PHI slot location.
It might be possible to further simplify the code in addOperandToPHI,
but this would not only mean to pull out getNewValue, but to also change the
insertion point update logic. As this did not work when trying it the first
time, this change is likely not trivial. To not introduce bugs last minute, we
postpone further simplications to a subsequent commit.
We also document the current behavior a little bit better.
Reviewed By: Meinersbur
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D28892
llvm-svn: 292486
This allows us to delinearize code such as the one below, where the array
sizes are A[][2 * n] as there are n times two elements in the innermost
dimension. Alternatively, we could try to generate another dimension for the
struct in the innermost dimension, but as the struct has constant size,
recovering this dimension is easy.
struct com {
double Real;
double Img;
};
void foo(long n, struct com A[][n]) {
for (long i = 0; i < 100; i++)
for (long j = 0; j < 1000; j++)
A[i][j].Real += A[i][j].Img;
}
int main() {
struct com A[100][1000];
foo(1000, A);
llvm-svn: 288489
We now collect:
Number of total loops
Number of loops in scops
Number of scops
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 1
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 2
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 3
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 4
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 5
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 6 and larger
Number of loops in scops (profitable scops only)
Number of scops (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 1 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 2 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 3 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 4 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 5 (profitable scops only)
Number of scops with maximal loop depth 6 and larger (profitable scops only)
These statistics are certainly completely accurate as we might drop scops
when building up their polyhedral representation, but they should give a good
indication of the number of scops we detect.
llvm-svn: 287973
Our original statistics were added before we introduced a more fine-grained
diagnostic system, but the granularity of our statistics has never been
increased accordingly. This change introduces now one statistic counter per
diagnostic to enable us to collect fine-grained statistics about who certain
scops are not detected. In case coarser grained statistics are needed, the
user is expected to combine counters manually.
llvm-svn: 287968
Do not assume a load to be hoistable/invariant if the pointer is used by
another instruction in the SCoP that might write to memory and that is
always executed.
llvm-svn: 287272
The validity of a branch condition must be verified at the location of the
branch (the branch instruction), not the location of the icmp that is
used in the branch instruction. When verifying at the wrong location, we
may accept an icmp that is defined within a loop which itself dominates, but
does not contain the branch instruction. Such loops cannot be modeled as
we only introduce domain dimensions for surrounding loops. To address this
problem we change the scop detection to evaluate and verify SCEV expressions at
the right location.
This issue has been around since at least r179148 "scop detection: properly
instantiate SCEVs to the place where they are used", where we explicitly
set the scope to the wrong location. Before this commit the scope
was not explicitly set, which probably also resulted in the scope around the
ICmp to be choosen.
This resolves http://llvm.org/PR30989
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286769
Assumptions can either be added for a given basic block, in which case the set
describing the assumptions is expected to match the dimensions of its domain.
In case no basic block is provided a parameter-only set is expected to describe
the assumption.
The piecewise expressions that are generated by the SCEVAffinator sometimes
have a zero-dimensional domain (e.g., [p] -> { [] : p <= -129 or p >= 128 }),
which looks similar to a parameter-only domain, but is still a set domain.
This change adds an assert that checks that we always pass parameter domains to
addAssumptions if BB is empty to make mismatches here fail early.
We also change visitTruncExpr to always convert to parameter sets, if BB is
null. This change resolves http://llvm.org/PR30941
Another alternative to this change would have been to inspect all code to make
sure we directly generate in the SCEV affinator parameter sets in case of empty
domains. However, this would likely complicate the code which combines parameter
and non-parameter domains when constructing a statement domain. We might still
consider doing this at some point, but as this likely requires several non-local
changes this should probably be done as a separate refactoring.
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286444
When extracting constant expressions out of SCEVs, new parameters may be
introduced, which have not been registered before. This change scans
SCEV expressions after constant extraction again to make sure newly
introduced parameters are registered.
We may for example extract the constant '8' from the expression '((8 * ((%a *
%b) + %c)) + (-8 * %a))' and obtain the expression '(((-1 + %b) * %a) + %c)'.
The new expression has a new parameter '(-1 + %b) * %a)', which was not
registered before, but must be registered to not crash.
This closes http://llvm.org/PR30953
Reported-by: Eli Friedman <efriedma@codeaurora.org>
llvm-svn: 286430
We don't actually check whether a MemoryAccess is affine in very many
places, but one important one is in checks for aliasing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25706
llvm-svn: 285746
When adding an llvm.memcpy instruction to AliasSetTracker, it uses the raw
source and target pointers which preserve bitcasts.
MemAccInst::getPointerOperand() also returns the raw target pointers, but
Scop::buildAliasGroups() did not for the source pointer. This lead to mismatches
between AliasSetTracker and ScopInfo on which pointer to use.
Fixed by also using raw pointers in Scop::buildAliasGroups().
llvm-svn: 285071
Integer math in LLVM IR is modular. Integer math in isl is
arbitrary-precision. Modeling LLVM IR math correctly in isl requires
either adding assumptions that math doesn't actually overflow, or
explicitly wrapping the math. However, expressions with the "nsw" flag
are special; we can pretend they're arbitrary-precision because it's
undefined behavior if the result wraps. SCEV expressions based on IR
instructions with an nsw flag also carry an nsw flag (roughly; actually,
the real rule is a bit more complicated, but the details don't matter
here).
Before this patch, SCEV flags were also overloaded with an additional
function: the ZExt code was mutating SCEV expressions as a hack to
indicate to checkForWrapping that we don't need to add assumptions to
the operand of a ZExt; it'll add explicit wrapping itself. This kind of
works... the problem is that if anything else ever touches that SCEV
expression, it'll get confused by the incorrect flags.
Instead, with this patch, we make the decision about whether to
explicitly wrap the math a bit earlier, basing the decision purely on
the SCEV expression itself, and not its users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D25287
llvm-svn: 284848
Update test after commit r284501:
[SCEV] Make CompareValueComplexity a little bit smarter
Contributed-by: Sanjoy Das <sanjoy@playingwithpointers.com>
llvm-svn: 284543
The test non_affine_loop_used_later.ll also tests the profability heuristic. Add
the option -polly-unprofitable-scalar-accs explicitely to ensure that the test
succeeds if the default value is changed.
llvm-svn: 284338
Under some conditions MK_Value read accessed where converted to MK_ExitPHI read
accessed. This is unexpected because MK_ExitPHI read accesses are implicit after
the scop execution. This behaviour was introduced in r265261, which fixed a
failed assertion/crash in CodeGen.
Instead, we fix this failure in CodeGen itself. createExitPHINodeMerges(),
despite its name, also handles accesses of kind MK_Value, only to skip them
because they access values that are usually not PHI nodes in the SCoP region's
exit block. Except in the situation observed in r265261.
Do not convert value accessed to ExitPHI accesses and do not handle
value accesses like ExitPHI accessed in CodeGen anymore.
llvm-svn: 284023
With this option one can disable the heuristic that assumes that statements with
a scalar write access cannot be profitably optimized. Such a statement instances
necessarily have WAW-dependences to itself. With DeLICM scalar accesses can be
changed to array accesses, which can avoid these WAW-dependence.
llvm-svn: 283233
ScopArrayInfo used to determine base pointer origins by looking up whether the
base pointer is a load. The "base pointer" for scalar accesses is the
llvm::Value being accessed. This is only a symbolic base pointer, it
represents the alloca variable (.s2a or .phiops) generated for it at code
generation.
This patch disables determining base pointer origin for scalars.
A test case where this caused a crash will be added in the next commit. In that
test SAI tried to get the origin base pointer that was only declared later,
therefore not existing. This is probably only possible for scalars used in
PHINode incoming blocks.
llvm-svn: 283232
The existing code would add the operands in the wrong order, and eventually
crash because the SCEV expression doesn't exactly match the parameter SCEV
expression in SCEVAffinator::visit. (SCEV doesn't sort the operands to
getMulExpr in general.)
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D23592
llvm-svn: 279087
Normally this is ensured when adding PHI nodes, but as PHI node dependences
do not need to be added in case all incoming blocks are within the same
non-affine region, this was missed.
This corrects an issue visible in LNT's sqlite3, in case invariant load hoisting
was disabled.
llvm-svn: 278792
This will make it easier to switch the default of Polly's invariant load
hoisting strategy and also makes it very clear that these test cases
indeed require invariant code hoisting to work.
llvm-svn: 278667
After having generated the code for a ScopStmt, we run a simple dead-code
elimination that drops all instructions that are known to be and remain unused.
Until this change, we only considered instructions for dead-code elimination, if
they have a corresponding instruction in the original BB that belongs to
ScopStmt. However, when generating code we do not only copy code from the BB
belonging to a ScopStmt, but also generate code for operands referenced from BB.
After this change, we now also considers code for dead code elimination, which
does not have a corresponding instruction in BB.
This fixes a bug in Polly-ACC where such dead-code referenced CPU code from
within a GPU kernel, which is possible as we do not guarantee that all variables
that are used in known-dead-code are moved to the GPU.
llvm-svn: 278103
This ensures that no trivially dead code is generated. This is not only cleaner,
but also avoids troubles in case code is generated in a separate function and
some of this dead code contains references to values that are not available.
This issue may happen, in case the memory access functions have been updated
and old getelementptr instructions remain in the code. With normal Polly,
a test case is difficult to draft, but the upcoming GPU code generation can
possibly trigger such problems. We will later extend this dead-code elimination
to region and vector statements.
llvm-svn: 276263
Check not only that the compiler is not crashing, but also whether the
probablematic part (The sequence of instructions simplified to '4') is reflected
in the output.
Thanks to Tobias for the hint.
llvm-svn: 275189
Michael Kruse