Allow vector fabs operations on bitcasted constant integer values to be optimized
in the same way that we already optimize scalar fabs.
So for code like this:
%bitcast = bitcast i64 18446744069414584320 to <2 x float> ; 0xFFFF_FFFF_0000_0000
%fabs = call <2 x float> @llvm.fabs.v2f32(<2 x float> %bitcast)
%ret = bitcast <2 x float> %fabs to i64
Instead of generating something like this:
movabsq (constant pool loadi of mask for sign bits)
vmovq (move from integer register to vector/fp register)
vandps (mask off sign bits)
vmovq (move vector/fp register back to integer return register)
We should generate:
mov (put constant value in return register)
I have also removed a redundant clause in the first 'if' statement:
N0.getOperand(0).getValueType().isInteger()
is the same thing as:
IntVT.isInteger()
Testcases for x86 and ARM added to existing files that deal with vector fabs.
One existing testcase for x86 removed because it is no longer ideal.
For more background, please see:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D4770
And:
http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20354
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D4785
llvm-svn: 214892
Fundamentally, there isn't a really portable way to test the constant
pool contents. Instead, pin this test to the bare-metal triple. This
also makes it a 64-bit triple which allows us to only match a single
constant pool rather than two. It can also just hard code the '.' prefix
as the format should be stable now that it has a fixed triple. Finally,
I've switched it to use CHECK-NEXT to be more precise in the instruction
sequence expected and to use variables rather than hard coding decisions
by the register allocator.
llvm-svn: 214679
This is intended to be the minimal change needed to fix PR20354 ( http://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=20354 ). The check for a vector operation was wrong; we need to check that the fabs itself is not a vector operation.
This patch will not generate the optimal code. A constant pool load and 'and' op will be generated instead of just returning a value that we can calculate in advance (as we do for the scalar case). I've put a 'TODO' comment for that here and expect to have that patch ready soon.
There is a very similar optimization that we can do in visitFNEG, so I've put another 'TODO' there and expect to have another patch for that too.
llvm-svn: 214670
Sanjay Patel