Commit Graph

11 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Robert Khasanov dd09a8f320 [AVX512] Bring back vector-shuffle lowering support through broadcasts
Ffter commit at rev219046 512-bit broadcasts lowering become non-optimal. Most of tests on broadcasting and embedded broadcasting were changed and they doesn’t produce efficient code.

Example below is from commit changes (it’s the first test from test/CodeGen/X86/avx512-vbroadcast.ll):

 define   <16 x i32> @_inreg16xi32(i32 %a) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: _inreg16xi32:
 ; CHECK:       ## BB#0:
-; CHECK-NEXT:    vpbroadcastd %edi, %zmm0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vmovd %edi, %xmm0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vpbroadcastd %xmm0, %ymm0
+; CHECK-NEXT:    vinserti64x4 $1, %ymm0, %zmm0, %zmm0
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    retq
 %b = insertelement <16 x i32> undef, i32 %a, i32 0
 %c = shufflevector <16 x i32> %b, <16 x i32> undef, <16 x i32> zeroinitializer
 ret <16 x i32> %c
}

Here, 256-bit broadcast was generated instead of 512-bit one.

In this patch
1) I added vector-shuffle lowering through broadcasts
2) Removed asserts and branches likes because this is incorrect
-  assert(Subtarget->hasDQI() && "We can only lower v8i64 with AVX-512-DQI");
3) Fixed lowering tests

llvm-svn: 220774
2014-10-28 12:28:51 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 99627bfbff [x86] Enable the new vector shuffle lowering by default.
Update the entire regression test suite for the new shuffles. Remove
most of the old testing which was devoted to the old shuffle lowering
path and is no longer relevant really. Also remove a few other random
tests that only really exercised shuffles and only incidently or without
any interesting aspects to them.

Benchmarking that I have done shows a few small regressions with this on
LNT, zero measurable regressions on real, large applications, and for
several benchmarks where the loop vectorizer fires in the hot path it
shows 5% to 40% improvements for SSE2 and SSE3 code running on Sandy
Bridge machines. Running on AMD machines shows even more dramatic
improvements.

When using newer ISA vector extensions the gains are much more modest,
but the code is still better on the whole. There are a few regressions
being tracked (PR21137, PR21138, PR21139) but by and large this is
expected to be a win for x86 generated code performance.

It is also more correct than the code it replaces. I have fuzz tested
this extensively with ISA extensions up through AVX2 and found no
crashes or miscompiles (yet...). The old lowering had a few miscompiles
and crashers after a somewhat smaller amount of fuzz testing.

There is one significant area where the new code path lags behind and
that is in AVX-512 support. However, there was *extremely little*
support for that already and so this isn't a significant step backwards
and the new framework will probably make it easier to implement lowering
that uses the full power of AVX-512's table-based shuffle+blend (IMO).

Many thanks to Quentin, Andrea, Robert, and others for benchmarking
assistance. Thanks to Adam and others for help with AVX-512. Thanks to
Hal, Eric, and *many* others for answering my incessant questions about
how the backend actually works. =]

I will leave the old code path in the tree until the 3 PRs above are at
least resolved to folks' satisfaction. Then I will rip it (and 1000s of
lines of code) out. =] I don't expect this flag to stay around for very
long. It may not survive next week.

llvm-svn: 219046
2014-10-04 03:52:55 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 19c9f8cd50 [x86] Regenerate a bunch more avx512 test cases using my script to have
tighter, more strict FileCheck assertions. Some of these I really like
as they show case exactly what instruction sequences come out of these
microscopic functionality tests.

llvm-svn: 218936
2014-10-03 00:50:03 +00:00
Chandler Carruth 3eda855c69 [x86] Remove some of the --show-mc-encoding flags from avx512 tests that
need to be updated for the new vector shuffle lowering.

After talking to Adam Nemet, Tim Northover, etc., it seems that testing
MC encodings in the same suite as the basic codegen isn't the right
approach. Instead, we're going to want dedicated MC tests for the
encodings. These encodings are starting to get in my way so I wanted to
cut them out early. The total set of instructions that should have
encoding tests added is:

  vpaddd
  vsqrtss
  vsqrtsd
  vmovlhps
  vmovhlps
  valignq
  vbroadcastss

Not too many parts of these tests were even using this. =]

llvm-svn: 218932
2014-10-03 00:36:29 +00:00
Adam Nemet 18355283ce [AVX512] Verify the code generated for the intrinsic _mm512_broadcastsd_pd
llvm-svn: 215487
2014-08-13 00:30:05 +00:00
Adam Nemet f1a80c1e17 [AVX512] Test that _mm512_set1_* intrinsics generate broadcasts
llvm-svn: 214275
2014-07-30 01:30:51 +00:00
Adam Nemet 9dcc254a47 [AVX512] Add missing CHECK-LABEL
llvm-svn: 214273
2014-07-30 01:30:45 +00:00
Elena Demikhovsky cf08809813 AVX-512: Removed "z" suffix from AVX-512 instructions, since it is incompatible with GCC.
I moved a test from avx512-vbroadcast-crash.ll to avx512-vbroadcast.ll
I defined HasAVX512 predicate as AssemblerPredicate. It means that you should invoke llvm-mc with "-mcpu=knl" to get encoding for AVX-512 instructions. I need this to let AsmMatcher to set different encoding for AVX and AVX-512 instructions that have the same mnemonic and operands (all scalar instructions).

llvm-svn: 197041
2013-12-11 14:31:04 +00:00
Elena Demikhovsky 5fed3b95db AVX-512: Added more tests for BROADCAST
llvm-svn: 188148
2013-08-11 12:29:16 +00:00
Stephen Lin 5532f9a9c3 CHECK-LABEL-ify tests
llvm-svn: 188087
2013-08-09 17:50:15 +00:00
Elena Demikhovsky 45c54ad8dc AVX-512 set: Added BROADCAST instructions
with lowering logic and a test.

llvm-svn: 187884
2013-08-07 12:34:55 +00:00