This causes errors when building LLDB because the Windows implementation
doesn't implement this method:
C:\src\llvm-project\lldb\source\Plugins\ScriptInterpreter\Python\ScriptInterpreterPython.cpp(915,19): error: allocating an object of abstract class type 'lldb_private::ConnectionGenericFile'
new ConnectionGenericFile(read_file, true));
^
C:\src\llvm-project\lldb\include\lldb/Utility/Connection.h(174,28): note: unimplemented pure virtual method 'GetReadObject' in 'ConnectionGenericFile'
virtual lldb::IOObjectSP GetReadObject() = 0;
^
This method is private and only called from this file and doesn't need
to be inline. Saves a TargetMachine.h include in MachineFunction.h, a
popular header. The include was introduced in 98603a8153 despite the
forward decl of LLVMTargetMachine.
The Promote action doesn't apply until LegalizeDAG. By the time
we get there, we would have already softened all the FP operations
if useSoftFloat was true. So there wouldn't be any operation left
to Promote.
This avoids confusing them with fission-related functionality.
I also moved two accessor functions from DWARFDIE into static
functions in DWARFASTParserClang were their only use is located.
Summary:
This temporarily disables the large working set size behavior in profile guided
size optimization due to internal benchmark regressions.
Reviewers: davidxl
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70207
The bug manifests as replacing a reduction operand with an undef
value.
The problem appears to be limited to cases where a min/max reduction
has extra uses of the compare operand to the select.
In the general case, we are tracking "ExternallyUsedValues" and
an "IgnoreList" of the reduction operations, but those may not apply
to the final compare+select in a min/max reduction.
For that, we use replaceAllUsesWith (RAUW) to ensure that the new
vectorized reduction values are transferred to all subsequent users.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70148
Summary:
Review comments in {D69854} recommended a simpler approach of creating the SMDiagnostics to remove much of the complexity. (thanks @thakis)
@vlad.tsyrklevich I've rebuilt on both Windows and Linux (running Linux with Address and Undefined sanitizers) over the clang code base
Reviewers: thakis, klimek, mitchell-stellar, vlad.tsyrklevich
Reviewed By: thakis
Subscribers: cfe-commits, thakis, vlad.tsyrklevich
Tags: #clang-format, #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69921
This broke in 51dcb292cc, "[lld-link] diagnose undefined symbols
before LTO when possible" (very soon after the 9.0 branch, so
luckily the 9.0 release is unaffected).
The code for loading objects we believe might be needed for autoimport
(loadMinGWAutomaticImports()) does run before the new
reportUnresolvable() function, but it had a condition to only operate
on symbols from regular object files. This condition came from
resolveRemainingUndefines(), but as loadMinGWAutomaticImports() now
has to operate before the LTO, it has to operate on undefineds from
LTO objects as well.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70166
Summary:
The option allows to disable specific target library builtin functions,
instead of -disable-simplify-libcalls, which disables all of them.
This is a prerequisite for D70143, which fixes PR43081.
Reviewers: xbolva00, spatel, jdoerfert, efriedma
Reviewed By: efriedma
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70193
v256i1 on X86 without avx512 breaks down to 256 i8 values when passed between basic blocks. But the NumRegistersForVT was sized at a byte for each VT. This results in 256 being stored as 0.
This patch enlarges the type to 16 bits and adds an assert to ensure that no information is lost when the entry is stored.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70138
During register coalescing, we update the live-intervals on-the-fly.
To do that we are in this strange mode where the live-intervals can
be slightly out-of-sync (more precisely they are forward looking)
compared to what the IR actually represents.
This happens because the register coalescer only updates the IR when
it is done with updating the live-intervals and it has to do it this
way because updating the IR on-the-fly would actually clobber some
information on how the live-ranges that are being updated look like.
This is problematic for updates that rely on the IR to accurately
represents the state of the live-ranges. Right now, we have only
one of those: stripValuesNotDefiningMask.
To reconcile this need of out-of-sync IR, this patch introduces a
new argument to LiveInterval::refineSubRanges that allows the code
doing the live range updates to reason about how the code should
look like after the coalescer will have rewritten the registers.
Essentially this captures how a subregister index with be offseted
to match its position in a new register class.
E.g., let say we want to merge:
V1.sub1:<2 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>
We do that by choosing a class where sub1:<2 x s32> and sub3:<4 x s32>
overlap, i.e., by choosing a class where we can find "offset + 1 == 3".
Put differently we align V2's sub3 with V1's sub1:
V2: sub0 sub1 sub2 sub3
V1: <offset> sub0 sub1
This offset will look like a composed subregidx in the the class:
V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>
=> V1.(composed sub2 with sub1):<4 x s32> = COPY V2.sub3:<4 x s32>
Now if we didn't rewrite the uses and def of V1, all the checks for V1
need to account for this offset to match what the live intervals intend
to capture.
Prior to this patch, we would fail to recognize the uses and def of V1
and would end up with machine verifier errors: No live segment at def.
This could lead to miscompile as we would drop some live-ranges and
thus, miss some interferences.
For this problem to trigger, we need to reach stripValuesNotDefiningMask
while having a mismatch between the IR and the live-ranges (i.e.,
we have to apply a subreg offset to the IR.)
This requires the following three conditions:
1. An update of overlapping subreg lanes: e.g., dsub0 == <ssub0, ssub1>
2. An update with Tuple registers with a possibility to coalesce the
subreg index: e.g., v1.dsub_1 == v2.dsub_3
3. Subreg liveness enabled.
looking at the IR to decide what is alive and what is not, i.e., calling
stripValuesNotDefiningMask.
coalescer maintains for the live-ranges information.
None of the targets that currently use subreg liveness (i.e., the targets
that fulfill #3, Hexagon, AMDGPU, PowerPC, and SystemZ IIRC) expose #1 and
and #2, so this patch also artificial enables subreg liveness for ARM,
so that a nice test case can be attached.
RETA always implicitly uses LR, unlike RET which merely has an
alias that defaults it to LR.
Additionally, RETA implicitly uses SP as well, which it uses as
a discriminator to authenticate LR.
This isn't usually noticeable, because RET_ReallyLR is used in most
of the backend. However, the post-RA scheduler, if enabled, will
cause miscompiles if the imp-uses are missing.
While there, fix a typo in the lone affected testcase.
The instruction definition has been retroactively expanded to
allow for an alias for '[xN, 0]!' as '[xN]!'.
That wouldn't make sense on LDR, but does for LDRA.
Depending on different cmake configures, clang may generate different
IR name for slot variables. Let us use the regex instead of hard
coding the name. I did the same for other bpf-attr-preserve-access-index
tests with such an approach, but somehow did not do for this one.
If a GCC installation is not detected, then this attempts to
use compiler-rt and the compiler-rt crtbegin/crtend
implementations as a fallback.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D68407
Summary:
when building plugins, as AIX has symbols in it's standard library that
must be garbage collected or we will see link errors. Export lists will
handle this instead on AIX.
Reviewers: stevewan, sfertile, jasonliu, xingxue, DiggerLin
Reviewed By: DiggerLin
Subscribers: mgorny, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70130
This is a resubmission for the previous reverted commit
9434360401 with the same subject. This commit fixed the
segfault issue and addressed additional review comments.
This patch introduced a new bpf specific attribute which can
be added to struct or union definition. For example,
struct s { ... } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
union u { ... } __attribute__((preserve_access_index));
The goal is to simplify user codes for cases
where preserve access index happens for certain struct/union,
so user does not need to use clang __builtin_preserve_access_index
for every members.
The attribute has no effect if -g is not specified.
When the attribute is specified and -g is specified, any member
access defined by that structure or union, including array subscript
access and inner records, will be preserved through
__builtin_preserve_{array,struct,union}_access_index()
IR intrinsics, which will enable relocation generation
in bpf backend.
The following is an example to illustrate the usage:
-bash-4.4$ cat t.c
#define __reloc__ __attribute__((preserve_access_index))
struct s1 {
int c;
} __reloc__;
struct s2 {
union {
struct s1 b[3];
};
} __reloc__;
struct s3 {
struct s2 a;
} __reloc__;
int test(struct s3 *arg) {
return arg->a.b[2].c;
}
-bash-4.4$ clang -target bpf -g -S -O2 t.c
A relocation with access string "0:0:0:0:2:0" will be generated
representing access offset of arg->a.b[2].c.
forward declaration with attribute is also handled properly such
that the attribute is copied and populated in real record definition.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69759
Split out the logic to get the size of a merged profile and to do a
compatibility check. This can be shared with both the continuous+merging
mode implementation, as well as the runtime-allocated counters
implementation planned for Fuchsia.
Lifted out of D69586.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70135
As noted by the FIXME comment, this is not correct based on our current FMF semantics.
We should be propagating FMF from the final value in a sequence (in this case the
'select'). So the behavior even without this patch is wrong, but we did not allow FMF
on 'select' until recently.
But if we do the correct thing right now in this patch, we'll inevitably introduce
regressions because we have not wired up FMF propagation for 'phi' and 'select' in
other passes (like SimplifyCFG) or other places in InstCombine. I'm not seeing a
better incremental way to make progress.
That said, the potential extra damage over the existing wrong behavior from this
patch is very limited. AFAIK, the only way to have different FMF on IR in the same
function is if we have LTO inlined IR from 2 modules that were compiled using
different fast-math settings.
As seen in the tests, we may actually see some improvements with this patch because
adding the FMF to the 'select' allows matching to min/max intrinsics that were
previously missed (in the common case, the 'fcmp' and 'select' should have identical
FMF to begin with).
Next steps in the transition:
Make similar changes in instcombine as needed.
Enable phi-to-select FMF propagation in SimplifyCFG.
Remove dependencies on fcmp with FMF.
Deprecate FMF on fcmp.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D69720
Summary:
This avoid the need to duplicate the location lists searching logic in
various users. The "inline location list dumping" code (which is the
only user actually updated to handle DWARF v5 location lists) is
switched to this method. After adding v4 location list support, I'll
switch other users too.
Reviewers: dblaikie, probinson, JDevlieghere, aprantl, SouraVX
Subscribers: hiraditya, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D70084
Reid Kleckner