Clang uses "ctpop & 1" to implement __builtin_parity. If the popcnt instruction isn't supported this generates a large amount of code to calculate the population count. Instead we can bisect the data down to a single byte using xor and then check the parity flag.
Even when popcnt is supported, its still a good idea to split 64-bit data on 32-bit targets using an xor in front of a single popcnt. Otherwise we get two popcnts and an add before the and.
I've specifically targeted this at the sizes supported by clang builtins, but we could generalize this if we think that's useful.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50165
llvm-svn: 338907
In r337830 I added SCEV checks to enable us to insert fewer bounds checks. Unfortunately, this sometimes crashes when multiple bounds checks are added due to SCEV caching issues. This patch splits the bounds checking pass into two phases, one that computes all the conditions (using SCEV checks) and the other that adds the new instructions.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49946
llvm-svn: 338902
We don't expect module names to be present in the index. This patch adds
DW_TAG_module to the blacklist.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50237
llvm-svn: 338878
Some instructions expand to more than one decoder group.
This has been hitherto ignored, but is handled with this patch.
Review: Ulrich Weigand
https://reviews.llvm.org/D50187
llvm-svn: 338849
Basic pattern that leaves an unnecessary select on a rotation by zero result. This variant is trivial - the more general case with a compare+branch to prevent execution of undefined shifts is more tricky.
llvm-svn: 338833
There are a lot of permutations of types here generating a lot of patterns in the isel table. It's more efficient to just ReplaceUses and RemoveDeadNode from the Select function.
The test changes are because we have a some shuffle patterns that have a bitcast as their root node. But the behavior is identical to another instruction whose pattern doesn't start with a bitcast. So this isn't a functional change.
llvm-svn: 338824
Move all the patterns to X86InstrVecCompiler.td so we can keep SSE/AVX/AVX512 all in one place.
To save some patterns we'll use an existing DAG combine to convert f128 fand/for/fxor to integer when sse2 is enabled. This allows use to reuse all the existing patterns for v2i64.
I believe this now makes SHA instructions the only case where VEX/EVEX and legacy encoded instructions could be generated simultaneously.
llvm-svn: 338821
This is the second patch of the series which intends to enable jump threading for an inlined method whose return type is std::pair<int, bool> or std::pair<bool, int>.
The first patch is https://reviews.llvm.org/rL338485.
This patch handles code sequences that merges two values using `shl` and `or`, then extracts one value using `and`.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49981
llvm-svn: 338817
If the producing instruction is legacy encoded it doesn't implicitly zero the upper bits. This is important for the SHA instructions which don't have a VEX encoded version. We might also be able to hit this with the incomplete f128 support that hasn't been ported to VEX.
llvm-svn: 338812
This one requires a bit of explaination. It's not every day you simply delete code to implement an optimization. :)
The transform in question is sinking an instruction from a loop to the uses in loop exiting blocks. We know (from LCSSA) that all of the uses outside the loop must be phi nodes, and after predecessor splitting, we know all phi users must have a single operand. Since the use must be strictly dominated by the def, we know from the definition of dominance/ssa that the exit block must execute along a (non-strict) subset of paths which reach the def. As a result, duplicating a potentially faulting instruction can not *introduce* a fault that didn't previously exist in the program.
The full story is that this patch builds on "rL338671: [LICM] Factor out fault legality from canHoistOrSinkInst [NFC]" which pulled this logic out of a common helper routine. As best I can tell, this check was originally added to the helper function for hoisting legality, later an incorrect fastpath for loads/calls was added, and then the bug was fixed by duplicating the fault safety check in the hoist path. This left the redundant check in the common code to pessimize sinking for no reason. I split it out in an NFC, and am not removing the unneccessary check. I wanted there to be something easy to revert in case I missed something.
Reviewed by: Anna Thomas (in person)
llvm-svn: 338794
Summary:
With Mach-O, there is a flag requirement discrepancy between working with
universal binaries and thin binaries. Many flags that don't require the `-macho`
flag (for example `-private-headers` and `-disassemble`) fail to work on
universal binaries unless `-macho` is given. When this happens, the error
message is unhelpful, stating:
The file was not recognized as a valid object file.
Which can lead to confusion.
This change allows generic flags to be used on universal binaries with and
without the `-macho` flag. This means flags that can be used for thin files can
be used consistently with fat files too.
To do this, the universal binary support within `ParseInputMachO()` is extracted
into a new function. This new function is called directly from `DumpInput()`
when the input binary is universal. Additionally the `-arch` flag validation in
`ParseInputMachO()` was extracted to be reused.
Reviewers: compnerd
Reviewed By: compnerd
Subscribers: keith, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48702
llvm-svn: 338792
At least on ELF, it's impossible to tell from the object file whether
two globals with the same section marking were merged: the merged global
uses "private" linkage to hide its symbol, and the aliases look like
regular symbols. I can't think of any other reason to disallow it.
(Of course, we can only merge globals in the same section.)
The weird alignment handling matches AsmPrinter; our alignment handling
for global variables should probably be refactored.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49822
llvm-svn: 338791
Summary:
I encountered some problems with SIFixWWMLiveness when WWM is in a loop:
1. It sometimes gave invalid MIR where there is some control flow path
to the new implicit use of a register on EXIT_WWM that does not pass
through any def.
2. There were lots of false positives of registers that needed to have
an implicit use added to EXIT_WWM.
3. Adding an implicit use to EXIT_WWM (and adding an implicit def just
before the WWM code, which I tried in order to fix (1)) caused lots
of the values to be spilled and reloaded unnecessarily.
This commit is a rework of SIFixWWMLiveness, with the following changes:
1. Instead of considering any register with a def that can reach the WWM
code and a def that can be reached from the WWM code, it now
considers three specific cases that need to be handled.
2. A register that needs liveness over WWM to be synthesized now has it
done by adding itself as an implicit use to defs other than the
dominant one.
Also added the following fixmes:
FIXME: We should detect whether a register in one of the above
categories is already live at the WWM code before deciding to add the
implicit uses to synthesize its liveness.
FIXME: I believe this whole scheme may be flawed due to the possibility
of the register allocator doing live interval splitting.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46756
Change-Id: Ie7fba0ede0378849181df3f1a9a7a39ed1a94a94
llvm-svn: 338783
Summary:
This fixes a problem where a load from global+idx generated incorrect
code on <=gfx7 when the index is divergent.
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, wdng, nhaehnle, yaxunl, dstuttard, t-tye, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D47383
Change-Id: Ib4d177d6254b1dd3f8ec0203fdddec94bd8bc5ed
llvm-svn: 338779
This will remove suboptimal branching from the generated ll/sc loops.
The extra simplification pass affects a lot of testcases, which have
been modified to accommodate this change: either by modifying the
test to become immune to the CFG simplification, or (less preferablt)
by adding option -hexagon-initial-cfg-clenaup=0.
llvm-svn: 338774
Rather than allowing invalid bitcasts to be lowered to wasm
call instructions that won't validate, generate wrappers that
contain unreachable thereby delaying the error until runtime.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49517
llvm-svn: 338744
These instructions perform the same operation, but the semantic of which operand is destroyed is reversed. If the same register is used as both operands we can change the execution domain without worrying about this difference.
Unfortunately, this really only works in cases where the input register is killed by the instruction. If its not killed, the two address isntruction pass inserts a copy that will become a move instruction. This makes the instruction use different physical registers that contain the same data at the time the unpck/movhlps executes. I've considered using a unary pseudo instruction with tied operand to trick the two address instruction pass. We could then expand the pseudo post regalloc to get the same physical register on both inputs.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50157
llvm-svn: 338735
This adds the NAN checks suggested in PR37776:
https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=37776
If both operands to maxnum are NAN, that should get constant folded, so we don't
have to handle that case. This is the same assumption as other FP ops in this
function. Returning 'false' is always conservatively correct.
Copying from the bug report:
Currently, we have this for "when is cannotBeOrderedLessThanZero
(mustBePositiveOrNaN) true for maxnum":
L
-------------------
| Pos | Neg | NaN |
------------------------
|Pos | x | x | x |
------------------------
R |Neg | x | | x |
------------------------
|NaN | x | x | x |
------------------------
The cases with (Neg & NaN) are wrong. We should have:
L
-------------------
| Pos | Neg | NaN |
------------------------
|Pos | x | x | x |
------------------------
R |Neg | x | | |
------------------------
|NaN | x | | x |
------------------------
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50081
llvm-svn: 338716
As a part of adding the tiny codemodel, we need to support ldr's with :got:
relocations on them. This seems to be mostly already done, just needs the
relocation type support.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50137
llvm-svn: 338673
In expansion of FCOPYSIGN, the shift node is missing when the two
operands of FCOPYSIGN are of the same size. We should always generate
shift node (if the required shift bit is not zero) to put the sign
bit into the right position, regardless of the size of underlying
types.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49973
llvm-svn: 338665
Adding the FP_ROUND nodes when combining FP_TO_[SU]INT of elements
feeding a BUILD_VECTOR into an FP_TO_[SU]INT of the built vector
loses precision. This patch removes the code that adds these nodes
to true f64 operands. It also adds patterns required to ensure
the code is still vectorized rather than converting individual
elements and inserting into a vector.
Fixes https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38342
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50121
llvm-svn: 338658
AArch64 ELF ABI does not define a static relocation type for TLS offset within
a module, which makes it impossible for compiler to generate a valid
DW_AT_location content for thread local variables. Currently LLVM generates an
invalid R_AARCH64_ABS64 relocation at the DW_AT_location field for a TLS
variable. That causes trouble for linker because thread local variable does
not have an absolute address at link time. AArch64 GCC solves the problem by
not generating DW_AT_location for thread local variables. We should do the
same in LLVM.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43860
llvm-svn: 338655
(Previously reverted in r338442)
I'm told that the breakage came from us using an x86 triple on configs
that didn't have x86 enabled. This is remedied by moving the
debugcounter test to an x86 directory (where there's also a
opt-bisect-isel.ll test for similar reasons).
I can't repro the reverse-iteration failure mentioned in the revert with
this patch, so I assume that a misconfiguration on my end is what caused
that.
Original commit message:
Add DebugCounters to DivRemPairs
For people who don't use DebugCounters, NFCI.
Patch by Zhizhou Yang!
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50033
llvm-svn: 338653
Artem Belevich