Previously, we handled common symbols as a kind of Defined symbol,
but what we were doing for common symbols is pretty different from
regular defined symbols.
Common symbol and defined symbol are probably as different as shared
symbol and defined symbols are different.
This patch introduces CommonSymbol to represent common symbols.
After symbols are resolved, they are converted to Defined symbols
residing in a .bss section.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61895
llvm-svn: 360841
SymbolTable's add-family functions have lots of parameters because
when they have to create a new symbol, they forward given arguments
to Symbol's constructors. Therefore, the functions take at least as
many arguments as their corresponding constructors.
This patch simplifies the add-family functions. Now, the functions
take a symbol instead of arguments to construct a symbol. If there's
no existing symbol, a given symbol is memcpy'ed to the symbol table.
Otherwise, the functions attempt to merge the existing and a given
new symbol.
I also eliminated `CanOmitFromDynSym` parameter, so that the functions
take really one argument.
Symbol classes are trivially constructible, so looks like constructing
them to pass to add-family functions is as cheap as passing a lot of
arguments to the functions. A quick benchmark showed that this patch
seems performance-neutral.
This is a preparation for
http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131902.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61855
llvm-svn: 360838
The symbol table used to be a container of vectors of input files,
but that's no longer the case because the vectors are moved out of
SymbolTable and are now global variables.
Therefore, addFile doesn't have to belong to any class. This patch
moves the function out of the class.
This patch is a preparation for my RFC [1].
[1] http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-April/131902.html
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61854
llvm-svn: 360666
It makes the --plugin-opt=obj-path= and --plugin-opt=thinlto-index-only=
behavior more consistent - the files will be created in the
BitcodeFiles.empty() case, but I assume whether it behaves this way is
not required by anyone.
LTOObj->run() cannot run with empty BitcodeFiles. There would be an error:
ld.lld: error: No available targets are compatible with triple ""
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61635
llvm-svn: 360129
Summary:
The gold plugin behavior (creating empty index files for lazy bitcode
files) was added in D46034, but it missed the case when there is no
non-lazy bitcode files, e.g.
ld.lld -shared crti.o crtbeginS.o --start-lib bitcode.o --end-lib ...
crti.o crtbeginS.o are not bitcode, but our distributed build system
wants bitcode.o.thinlto.bc to confirm all expected outputs are created
based on all of the modules provided to the linker.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61420
llvm-svn: 359788
Summary:
In ld.bfd/gold, --no-allow-shlib-undefined is the default when linking
an executable. This patch implements a check to error on undefined
symbols in a shared object, if all of its DT_NEEDED entries are seen.
Our approach resembles the one used in gold, achieves a good balance to
be useful but not too smart (ld.bfd traces all DSOs and emulates the
behavior of a dynamic linker to catch more cases).
The error is issued based on the symbol table, different from undefined
reference errors issued for relocations. It is most effective when there
are DSOs that were not linked with -z defs (e.g. when static sanitizers
runtime is used).
gold has a comment that some system libraries on GNU/Linux may have
spurious undefined references and thus system libraries should be
excluded (https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6811). The
story may have changed now but we make --allow-shlib-undefined the
default for now. Its interaction with -shared can be discussed in the
future.
Reviewers: ruiu, grimar, pcc, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: joerg, emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57385
llvm-svn: 352826
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
If a DSO appears more than once with and without --as-needed, ld.bfd and gold consider --no-as-needed to takes precedence over --as-needed. lld didn't and this patch makes it do so.
This makes it a bit away from the position-dependent behavior (how
different occurrences of the same DSO interact) and protects us from
some mysterious runtime errors: if some interceptor libraries add their
own --no-as-needed dependencies (e.g. librt.so), and the user
application specifies -Wl,--as-needed -lrt , the absence of the
DT_NEEDED entry would make dlsym(RTLD_NEXT, "clock_gettime") return NULL
and would break at runtime.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D56089
llvm-svn: 350105
Summary:
In glibc, libc.so is a linker script with an as-needed dependency on ld-linux-x86-64.so.2
GROUP ( /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc_nonshared.a AS_NEEDED ( /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 ) )
ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (as-needed) defines some symbols which resolve undefined references in libc.so.6, it will therefore be added as a DT_NEEDED entry, which isn't necessary.
The test case as-needed-not-in-regular.s emulates the libc.so scenario, where ld.bfd and gold don't add DT_NEEDED for a.so
The relevant code in gold/resolve.cc:
// If we have a non-WEAK reference from a regular object to a
// dynamic object, mark the dynamic object as needed.
if (to->is_from_dynobj() && to->in_reg() && !to->is_undef_binding_weak())
to->object()->set_is_needed();
in_reg() appears to do something similar to IsUsedInRegularObj.
This patch makes lld do the similar thing, but moves the check from
addShared to a later stage MarkLive where all symbols are scanned.
Reviewers: ruiu, pcc, espindola
Reviewed By: ruiu
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55902
llvm-svn: 349849
Now it returns Symbol. This should be NFC that
avoids doing cast at the caller's sides.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54627
llvm-svn: 347455
`Type` parameter was used only to check for TLS attribute mismatch,
but we can do that when we actually replace symbols, so we don't need
to type as an argument. This change should simplify the interface of
the symbol table a bit.
llvm-svn: 344394
`SymbolTable` is a singleton class and is a global variable for the
unique instance, so we can always refer the symtab by `Symtab->`.
However, we don't need to use the global varaible from member functions
of SymbolTable class.
llvm-svn: 344075
We have an issue with -wrap that the option doesn't work well when
renamed symbols get PLT entries. I'll explain what is the issue and
how this patch solves it.
For one -wrap option, we have three symbols: foo, wrap_foo and real_foo.
Currently, we use memcpy to overwrite wrapped symbols so that they get
the same contents. This works in most cases but doesn't when the relocation
processor sets some flags in the symbol. memcpy'ed symbols are just
aliases, so they always have to have the same contents, but the
relocation processor breaks that assumption.
r336609 is an attempt to fix the issue by memcpy'ing again after
processing relocations, so that symbols that are out of sync get the
same contents again. That works in most cases as well, but it breaks
ASan build in a mysterious way.
We could probably fix the issue by choosing symbol attributes that need
to be copied after they are updated. But it feels too complicated to me.
So, in this patch, I fixed it once and for all. With this patch, we no
longer memcpy symbols. All references to renamed symbols point to new
symbols after wrapSymbols() is done.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D50569
llvm-svn: 340387
If we have 2 bitcode inputs for different targets, LLD would
print "<internal>" instead of the name of one of the files.
The patch adds a test and fixes this issue.
llvm-svn: 336794
Patch by Matthew Koontz!
Before, direct calls to __wrap_sym would not map to valid PLT entries,
so they would crash at runtime. This change maps such calls to the same
PLT entry as calls to sym that are then wrapped.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D48502
llvm-svn: 336609
Summary:
Suppose we visit symbols in this order:
1. weak definition of foo in a lazy object
2. reference of foo
3 (optional). definition of foo
bfd/gold allows 123 but not 12.
Current --warn-backrefs implementation will report both cases as a backward reference. With this change, both 123 (intended) and 12 (unintended) are allowed. The usage of weak definitions usually imply there are also global definitions, so the trade-off is justified.
Reviewers: ruiu, espindola
Subscribers: emaste, arichardson, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46624
llvm-svn: 332061
Our code for LazyObject and LazyArchive duplicates.
This patch extracts the common part to remove
the duplication.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45516
llvm-svn: 330701
I'm proposing a new command line flag, --warn-backrefs in this patch.
The flag and the feature proposed below don't exist in GNU linkers
nor the current lld.
--warn-backrefs is an option to detect reverse or cyclic dependencies
between static archives, and it can be used to keep your program
compatible with GNU linkers after you switch to lld. I'll explain the
feature and why you may find it useful below.
lld's symbol resolution semantics is more relaxed than traditional
Unix linkers. Therefore,
ld.lld foo.a bar.o
succeeds even if bar.o contains an undefined symbol that have to be
resolved by some object file in foo.a. Traditional Unix linkers
don't allow this kind of backward reference, as they visit each
file only once from left to right in the command line while
resolving all undefined symbol at the moment of visiting.
In the above case, since there's no undefined symbol when a linker
visits foo.a, no files are pulled out from foo.a, and because the
linker forgets about foo.a after visiting, it can't resolve
undefined symbols that could have been resolved otherwise.
That lld accepts more relaxed form means (besides it makes more
sense) that you can accidentally write a command line or a build
file that works only with lld, even if you have a plan to
distribute it to wider users who may be using GNU linkers. With
--check-library-dependency, you can detect a library order that
doesn't work with other Unix linkers.
The option is also useful to detect cyclic dependencies between
static archives. Again, lld accepts
ld.lld foo.a bar.a
even if foo.a and bar.a depend on each other. With --warn-backrefs
it is handled as an error.
Here is how the option works. We assign a group ID to each file. A
file with a smaller group ID can pull out object files from an
archive file with an equal or greater group ID. Otherwise, it is a
reverse dependency and an error.
A file outside --{start,end}-group gets a fresh ID when
instantiated. All files within the same --{start,end}-group get the
same group ID. E.g.
ld.lld A B --start-group C D --end-group E
A and B form group 0, C, D and their member object files form group
1, and E forms group 2. I think that you can see how this group
assignment rule simulates the traditional linker's semantics.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D45195
llvm-svn: 329636
They are to pull out an object file for a symbol, but for a historical
reason the code is written in two separate functions. This patch
merges them.
llvm-svn: 329039
This fixes pr36623.
The problem is that we have to parse versions out of names before LTO
so that LTO can use that information.
When we get the LTO produced .o files, we replace the previous symbols
with the LTO produced ones, but they still have @ in their names.
We could just trim the name directly, but calling parseSymbolVersion
to do it is simpler.
llvm-svn: 328738
We found that when you pass --allow-multiple-definitions or `-z muldefs`
to GNU linkers, they don't complain about duplicate symbols at all. They
don't even print out warnings on it. We emit warnings in that case.
If you pass --fatal-warnings, that difference results in a link failure.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D44549
llvm-svn: 327920
It looks like the problem that caused us to originally warn instead of
error was that of a symbol being assigned to the same version twice.
Now we don't warn if a symbol is assigned to the same version twice,
but error if it is assigned to multiple.
This fixes pr28342.
llvm-svn: 326813
It should be possible to resolve undefined symbols in dynamic libraries
using symbols defined in a linker script.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43011
llvm-svn: 326176
We have an internal program that does't link without this patch. I don't
know of any open-source program that needs this, but there might be.
Since this patch improves compatibility with GNU linkers with a few lines
of code, I think it's worth to be committed.
The problem is about undefined symbols in DSOs. Some programs depend on
the GNU linkers' behavior that they pull out object files from archive
files to resolve undefined symbols in DSOs. We already allow that kind of
"reverse" dependency (from DSOs to the main executable) for regular
symbols, in particular, for "__progname" symbol (which is usually in
crt0.o), but that doesn't work if the symbol is in an archive file.
This patch is to make it work.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43658
llvm-svn: 325849
There seems to be no reason to collect this list of symbols.
Also fix a bug where --exclude-libs would apply to all symbols that
appear in an archive's symbol table, even if the relevant archive
member was not added to the link.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D43369
llvm-svn: 325380
Previously, we accidentally dropped STB_WEAK bit from an undefined symbol
if there is a lazy object symbol with the same name. That caused a
compatibility issue with GNU gold.
llvm-svn: 325316
When there is a duplicate absolute symbol, LLD reports <internal>
instead of known object file name currently.
Patch fixes the issue.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D42636
llvm-svn: 323849
Summary:
All other templated methods have explicit instantiations but this one is
missing. Discovered while building with a clang with inliner
modifications.
Reviewers: espindola
Subscribers: emaste, llvm-commits, davidxl
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41847
llvm-svn: 322057
LLD previously used to handle dynamic lists and version scripts in the
exact same way, even though they have very different semantics for
shared libraries and subtly different semantics for executables. r315114
untangled their semantics for executables (building on previous work to
correct their semantics for shared libraries). With that change, dynamic
lists won't set the default version to VER_NDX_LOCAL, and so resetting
the version to VER_NDX_GLOBAL in scanShlibUndefined is unnecessary.
This was causing an issue because version scripts containing `local: *`
work by setting the default version to VER_NDX_LOCAL, but scanShlibUndefined
would override this default, and therefore symbols which should have
been local would end up in the dynamic symbol table, which differs from
both bfd and gold's behavior. gold silently keeps the symbol hidden in
such a scenario, whereas bfd issues an error. I prefer bfd's behavior
and plan to implement that in LLD in a follow-up (and the test case
added here will be updated accordingly).
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41639
llvm-svn: 321982
We normally avoid "switch (Config->EKind)", but in this case I think
it is worth it.
It is only executed when there is an error and it allows detemplating
a lot of code.
llvm-svn: 321404
Specifically, libwidevinecdm.so in Chrome has such bad symbol.
It seems the BFD linker handles them as local symbols, so instead
of inserting them to the symbol table, we should skip them too.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41257
llvm-svn: 320770
By using an index instead of a pointer for verdef we can put the index
next to the alignment field. This uses the otherwise wasted area and
reduces the shared symbol size.
By itself the performance change of this is in the noise, but I have a
followup patch to remove another 8 bytes that improves performance
when combined with this.
llvm-svn: 320449
This includes a fix to mark copy reloc aliases as used.
Original message:
[ELF] Do not keep symbols if they referenced only from discarded sections.
This patch also ensures that in case of "--as-needed" is used,
DT_NEEDED entries are not created if they are required only by
these eliminated symbols.
llvm-svn: 319215
Currently we mark every shared symbol as STB_WEAK.
That is a hack to make it easy to decide when a .so is needed or not
because of a reference to a given symbol.
That hack leaks when we create copy relocations as shown by the update
to relocation-copy-alias.s.
This patch stores the original binding when we first read a shared
symbol. We still have to update the binding to weak if we see a weak
undef, but I find the logic easier to read where it is now.
llvm-svn: 319127
This patch also ensures that in case of "--as-needed" is used,
DT_NEEDED entries are not created if they are required only by
these eliminated symbols.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38790
llvm-svn: 319008
The Traced flag is unnecessary because we only need to set the index
to -1 to mark a symbol for tracing.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39672
llvm-svn: 317450
Now that DefinedRegular is the only remaining derived class of
Defined, we can merge the two classes.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39667
llvm-svn: 317448
Common symbols are now represented with a DefinedRegular that points
to a BssSection, even during symbol resolution.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39666
llvm-svn: 317447
r317396 changed the way how we handle the -defsym option. The option is
now handled using the infrastructure for the linker script.
We used to handle both -defsym and -wrap using the same set of functions
in the symbol table. Now, we don't need to do that.
This patch rewrites the functions so that they become more straightforward.
The new functions directly handle -wrap rather than abstract it.
llvm-svn: 317426
Now that we have only SymbolBody as the symbol class. So, "SymbolBody"
is a bit strange name now. This is a mechanical change generated by
perl -i -pe s/SymbolBody/Symbol/g $(git grep -l SymbolBody lld/ELF lld/COFF)
nd clang-format-diff.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39459
llvm-svn: 317370
This is PR34826.
Currently LLD is unable to report line number when reporting
duplicate declaration of some variable.
That happens because for extracting line information we always use
.debug_line section content which describes mapping from machine
instructions to source file locations, what does not help for
variables as does not describe them.
In this patch I am taking the approproate information about
variables locations from the .debug_info section.
Differential revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D38721
llvm-svn: 317080
SymbolBody and Symbol were separated classes due to a historical reason.
Symbol used to be a pointer to a SymbolBody, and the relationship
between Symbol and SymbolBody was n:1.
r2681780 changed that. Since that patch, SymbolBody and Symbol are
allocated next to each other to improve memory locality, and they have
1:1 relationship now. So, the separation of Symbol and SymbolBody no
longer makes sense.
This patch merges them into one class. In order to avoid updating too
many places, I chose SymbolBody as a unified name. I'll rename it Symbol
in a follow-up patch.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D39406
llvm-svn: 317006
Rui Ueyama