Summary:
Implicit functions are outside the control of source authors and should
be exempt from style restrictions.
Tested via running clang tools tests.
This is an amended followup to https://reviews.llvm.org/D57207
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: jdoerfert, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D58095
llvm-svn: 354534
Summary:
Implicit functions are outside the control of source authors and should
be exempt from style restrictions.
Tested via running clang tools tests.
Reviewers: aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57207
llvm-svn: 352968
to reflect the new license.
We understand that people may be surprised that we're moving the header
entirely to discuss the new license. We checked this carefully with the
Foundation's lawyer and we believe this is the correct approach.
Essentially, all code in the project is now made available by the LLVM
project under our new license, so you will see that the license headers
include that license only. Some of our contributors have contributed
code under our old license, and accordingly, we have retained a copy of
our old license notice in the top-level files in each project and
repository.
llvm-svn: 351636
Summary:
The diagnostics from google-objc-function-naming check will be more
actionable if they provide a brief description of the requirements from
the Google Objective-C style guide. The more descriptive diagnostics may
help clarify that functions in the global namespace must have an
appropriate prefix followed by Pascal case (engineers working previously
with static functions might not immediately understand the different
requirements of static and non-static functions).
Test Notes:
Verified against the clang-tidy tests.
Reviewers: benhamilton, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: MyDeveloperDay, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55482
llvm-svn: 349123
Summary: The google-objc-function-naming check applies to functions that are not namespaced and should not be applied to C++ member functions. Such function declarations should be ignored by the check to avoid false positives in Objective-C++ sources.
Reviewers: benhamilton, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: aaron.ballman
Subscribers: xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D55101
llvm-svn: 348317
Summary:
§1 Description
This check finds function names in function declarations in Objective-C files that do not follow the naming pattern described in the Google Objective-C Style Guide. Function names should be in UpperCamelCase and functions that are not of static storage class should have an appropriate prefix as described in the Google Objective-C Style Guide. The function `main` is a notable exception. Function declarations in expansions in system headers are ignored.
Example conforming function definitions:
```
static bool IsPositive(int i) { return i > 0; }
static bool ABIsPositive(int i) { return i > 0; }
bool ABIsNegative(int i) { return i < 0; }
```
A fixit hint is generated for functions of static storage class but otherwise the check does not generate a fixit hint because an appropriate prefix for the function cannot be determined.
§2 Test Notes
* Verified clang-tidy tests pass successfully.
* Used check_clang_tidy.py to verify expected output of processing google-objc-function-naming.m
Reviewers: benhamilton, hokein, Wizard, aaron.ballman
Reviewed By: benhamilton
Subscribers: Eugene.Zelenko, mgorny, xazax.hun, cfe-commits
Tags: #clang-tools-extra
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D51575
llvm-svn: 347132
Nathan James