We won't link in pthreads if we weren't built with LLVM_ENABLE_THREADS
which means we won't get access to pthread_sigmask. Use sigprocmask
instead.
llvm-svn: 219288
The icmp-select-icmp optimization targets select-icmp.eq
only. This is now ensured by testing the branch predicate
explictly. This commit also includes the test case for pr21199.
llvm-svn: 219282
COFF normally doesn't allow us to describe the alignment of COMMON
symbols.
It turns out that most linkers use the symbol size as a hint as to how
aligned the symbol should be.
However the BFD folks have added a .drectve command, which we
now support as of r219229, that allows us to specify the alignment
precisely. With this in mind, stop rounding sizes up.
llvm-svn: 219281
thing we do inside selection dag. This code needs to be
migrated to queries on the function rather than global
data, but this organizes things before we start grabbing
the subtarget.
llvm-svn: 219271
mach-o supports "fat" files which are a header/table-of-contents followed by a
concatenation of mach-o files built for different architectures. Currently,
MemoryBuffer has no easy way to map a subrange (slice) of a file which lld
will need to select a mach-o slice of a fat file. The new function provides
an easy way to map a slice of a file into a MemoryBuffer. Test case included.
llvm-svn: 219260
Summary:
Fix pr21099
The pseudocode of what we were doing (spread through two functions) was:
if (operand.doesNotFitIn32Bits())
Opc.initializeWithFoo();
if (operand < 0)
operand = -operand;
if (operand.doesFitIn8Bits())
Opc.initializeWithBar();
else if (operand.doesFitIn32Bits())
Opc.initializeWithBlah();
doStuff(Opc);
So for operand == INT32_MIN, Opc was never initialized because the operand changes
from fitting in 32 bits to not fitting, causing the various bugs/error messages
noted by pr21099.
This patch adds an extra test at the beginning for this case, and an
llvm_unreachable to have better error message if the operand ends up
not fitting in 32-bits at the end.
Test Plan: new test + make check
Reviewers: jfb
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D5655
llvm-svn: 219257
It would be more convenient to pass DWARFSection into DWARFUnitSection
constructor, instead of passing its components (Data and RelocAddrMap)
as a separate arguments.
llvm-svn: 219252
This is somewhat the inverse of how similar bugs in DAE and ArgPromo
manifested and were addressed. In those passes, individual call sites
were visited explicitly, and then the old function was deleted. This
left the debug info with a null llvm::Function* that needed to be
updated to point to the new function.
In the case of DFSan, it RAUWs the old function with the wrapper, which
includes debug info. So now the debug info refers to the wrapper, which
doesn't actually have any instructions with debug info in it, so it is
ignored entirely - resulting in a DW_TAG_subprogram with no high/low pc,
etc. Instead, fix up the debug info to refer to the original function
after the RAUW messed it up.
Reviewed/discussed with Peter Collingbourne on the llvm-dev mailing
list.
llvm-svn: 219249
this, and in some circumstances (e.g. reducing particularly large test-cases)
this was causing bugpoint to be killed for hitting open file-handle limits.
No test case: I was only able to trigger this with test cases taking upwards of
10 mins to run.
llvm-svn: 219244
`LoopUnrollPass` says that it preserves `LoopInfo` -- make it so. In
particular, tell `LoopInfo` about copies of inner loops when unrolling
the outer loop.
Conservatively, also tell `ScalarEvolution` to forget about the original
versions of these loops, since their inputs may have changed.
Fixes PR20987.
llvm-svn: 219241
The main reason for this is that the MCAsmInfo class,
which we were previously using as the base class, sets
PrivateGlobalPrefix to "L", which causes all global
functions that start with L to be treated as local symbols.
MCAsmInfoELF sets PrivateGlobalPrefix to ".L", which is what
we want, and it is probably a good idea to use this as the
base class anyway, since we are emitting ELF binaries.
llvm-svn: 219237
Added a FIXME coment instead, we need to handle the case where the
two DS instructions being compared have different numbers of operands.
llvm-svn: 219236
It can only return null if passed a corrupted reference with a null Ref.p.
Checking for null is then an issue for asserts to check for internal
consistency, not control flow to check for invalid input.
I didn't add an assert(sec != nullptr) because toSec itself has a far more
complete assert.
llvm-svn: 219235
The GNU linker supports an -aligncomm directive that allows for power-of-2
alignment of common data. Add support to emit this directive.
llvm-svn: 219229
PE/COFF has a special section (.drectve) which can be used to pass options to
the linker (similar to LC_LINKER_OPTION). Add support to llvm-readobj to print
the contents of the section for tests.
llvm-svn: 219228
getOpenFileSlice gets passed the map size, so it makes no sense to say that
the size is volatile. The code will not even compute the size.
llvm-svn: 219226
On this file we had a mix of
* Twine
* const char *
* StringRef
The two that make sense are
* const Twine & (caller convenience)
* consc char * (that is what will eventually be passed to open.
Given that sys::fs::openFileForRead takes a "const Twine &", I picked that.
llvm-svn: 219224
This optimization tries to convert switch instructions that are used to select a value with only 2 unique cases + default block
to a select or a couple of selects (depending if the default block is reachable or not).
The typical case this optimization wants to be able to optimize is this one:
Example:
switch (a) {
case 10: %0 = icmp eq i32 %a, 10
return 10; %1 = select i1 %0, i32 10, i32 4
case 20: ----> %2 = icmp eq i32 %a, 20
return 2; %3 = select i1 %2, i32 2, i32 %1
default:
return 4;
}
It also sets the base for further optimizations that are planned and being reviewed.
llvm-svn: 219223
Let me tell you a tale...
Originally committed in r211723 after discovering a nasty case of weird
scoping due to inlining, this was reverted in r211724 after it fired in
ASan/compiler-rt.
(minor diversion where I accidentally committed/reverted again in
r211871/r211873)
After further testing and fixing bugs in ArgumentPromotion (r211872) and
Inlining (r212065) it was recommitted in r212085. Reverted in r212089
after the sanitizer buildbots still showed problems.
Fixed another bug in ArgumentPromotion (r212128) found by this
assertion.
Recommitted in r212205, reverted in r212226 after it crashed some more
on sanitizer buildbots.
Fix clang some more in r212761.
Recommitted in r212776, reverted in r212793. ASan failures.
Recommitted in r213391, reverted in r213432, trying to reproduce flakey
ASan build failure.
Fixed bugs in r213805 (ArgPromo + DebugInfo), r213952
(LiveDebugVariables strips dbg_value intrinsics in functions not
described by debug info).
Recommitted in r214761, reverted in r214999, flakey failure on Windows
buildbot.
Fixed DeadArgElimination + DebugInfo bug in r219210.
Recommitting and hoping that's the last of it.
[That one burned down, fell over, then sank into the swamp.]
llvm-svn: 219215
After some stellar (& inspired) help from Reid Kleckner providing a test
case for some rather unstable undefined behavior showing up as
assertions produced by r214761, I was able to fix this issue in DAE
involving the application of both varargs removal, followed by normal
argument removal.
Indeed I introduced this same bug into ArgumentPromotion (r212128) by
copying the code from DAE, and when I fixed the bug in ArgPromo
(r213805) and commented in that patch that I didn't need to address the
same issue in DAE because it was a single pass. Turns out it's two pass,
one for the varargs and one for the normal arguments, so the same fix is
needed (at least during varargs removal). So here it is.
(the observable/net effect of this bug, even when it didn't result in
assertion failure, is that debug info would describe the DAE'd function
in the abstract, but wouldn't provide high/low_pc, variable locations,
line table, etc (it would appear as though the function had been
entirely optimized away), see the original PR14016 for details of the
general problem)
I'm not recommitting the assertion just yet, as there's been another
regression of it since I last tried. It might just be a few test cases
weren't adequately updated after Adrian or Duncan's recent schema
changes.
llvm-svn: 219210
David Majnemer