Summary:
Prevously assembler parsed all literals as either 32-bit integers or 32-bit floating-point values. Because of this we couldn't support f64 literals.
E.g. in instruction "v_fract_f64 v[0:1], 0.5", literal 0.5 was encoded as 32-bit literal 0x3f000000, which is incorrect and will be interpreted as 3.0517578125E-5 instead of 0.5. Correct encoding is inline constant 240 (optimal) or 32-bit literal 0x3FE00000 at least.
With this change the way immediate literals are parsed is changed. All literals are always parsed as 64-bit values either integer or floating-point. Then we convert parsed literals to correct form based on information about type of operand parsed (was literal floating or binary) and type of expected instruction operands (is this f32/64 or b32/64 instruction).
Here are rules how we convert literals:
- We parsed fp literal:
- Instruction expects 64-bit operand:
- If parsed literal is inlinable (e.g. v_fract_f64_e32 v[0:1], 0.5)
- then we do nothing this literal
- Else if literal is not-inlinable but instruction requires to inline it (e.g. this is e64 encoding, v_fract_f64_e64 v[0:1], 1.5)
- report error
- Else literal is not-inlinable but we can encode it as additional 32-bit literal constant
- If instruction expect fp operand type (f64)
- Check if low 32 bits of literal are zeroes (e.g. v_fract_f64 v[0:1], 1.5)
- If so then do nothing
- Else (e.g. v_fract_f64 v[0:1], 3.1415)
- report warning that low 32 bits will be set to zeroes and precision will be lost
- set low 32 bits of literal to zeroes
- Instruction expects integer operand type (e.g. s_mov_b64_e32 s[0:1], 1.5)
- report error as it is unclear how to encode this literal
- Instruction expects 32-bit operand:
- Convert parsed 64 bit fp literal to 32 bit fp. Allow lose of precision but not overflow or underflow
- Is this literal inlinable and are we required to inline literal (e.g. v_trunc_f32_e64 v0, 0.5)
- do nothing
- Else report error
- Do nothing. We can encode any other 32-bit fp literal (e.g. v_trunc_f32 v0, 10000000.0)
- Parsed binary literal:
- Is this literal inlinable (e.g. v_trunc_f32_e32 v0, 35)
- do nothing
- Else, are we required to inline this literal (e.g. v_trunc_f32_e64 v0, 35)
- report error
- Else, literal is not-inlinable and we are not required to inline it
- Are high 32 bit of literal zeroes or same as sign bit (32 bit)
- do nothing (e.g. v_trunc_f32 v0, 0xdeadbeef)
- Else
- report error (e.g. v_trunc_f32 v0, 0x123456789abcdef0)
For this change it is required that we know operand types of instruction (are they f32/64 or b32/64). I added several new register operands (they extend previous register operands) and set operand types to corresponding types:
'''
enum OperandType {
OPERAND_REG_IMM32_INT,
OPERAND_REG_IMM32_FP,
OPERAND_REG_INLINE_C_INT,
OPERAND_REG_INLINE_C_FP,
}
'''
This is not working yet:
- Several tests are failing
- Problems with predicate methods for inline immediates
- LLVM generated assembler parts try to select e64 encoding before e32.
More changes are required for several AsmOperands.
Reviewers: vpykhtin, tstellarAMD
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, artem.tamazov
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D22922
llvm-svn: 281050
Because of the special immediate operand, the constant
bus is already used so SGPRs are never useful.
r263212 changed the name of the immediate operand, which
broke the verifier check for the restriction.
llvm-svn: 274564
Summary:
These have been replaced with TableGen code (except for isConstantLoad,
which is still used for R600). The queries were broken for cases
where MemOperand was a PseudoSourceValue.
Reviewers: arsenm
Subscribers: arsenm, kzhuravl, llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D21684
llvm-svn: 274561
Standard load/store instructions with GLC bit set.
Reviewers: tstellardAMD, arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18760
llvm-svn: 265709
Summary:
Implement BUFFER_ATOMIC_CMPSWAP{,_X2} instructions on all GCN targets, and FLAT_ATOMIC_CMPSWAP{,_X2} on CI+.
32-bit instruction variants tested manually on Kabini and Bonaire. Tests and parts of code provided by Jan Veselý.
Patch by: Vedran Miletić
Reviewers: arsenm, tstellarAMD, nhaehnle
Subscribers: jvesely, scchan, kanarayan, arsenm
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D17280
llvm-svn: 265170
Changes:
- Added disassembler project
- Fixed all decoding conflicts in .td files
- Added DecoderMethod=“NONE” option to Target.td that allows to
disable decoder generation for an instruction.
- Created decoding functions for VS_32 and VReg_32 register classes.
- Added stubs for decoding all register classes.
- Added several tests for disassembler
Disassembler only supports:
- VI subtarget
- VOP1 instruction encoding
- 32-bit register operands and inline constants
[Valery]
One of the point that requires to pay attention to is how decoder
conflicts were resolved:
- Groups of target instructions were separated by using different
DecoderNamespace (SICI, VI, CI) using similar to AssemblerPredicate
approach.
- There were conflicts in IMAGE_<> instructions caused by two
different reasons:
1. dmask wasn’t specified for the output (fixed)
2. There are image instructions that differ only by the number of
the address components but have the same encoding by the HW spec. The
actual number of address components is determined by the HW at runtime
using image resource descriptor starting from the VGPR encoded in an
IMAGE instruction. This means that we should choose only one instruction
from conflicting group to be the rule for decoder. I didn’t find the way
to disable decoder generation for an arbitrary instruction and therefore
made a onelinear fix to tablegen generator that would suppress decoder
generation when DecoderMethod is set to “NONE”. This is a change that
should be reviewed and submitted first. Otherwise I would need to
specify different DecoderNamespace for every instruction in the
conflicting group. I haven’t checked yet if DecoderMethod=“NONE” is not
used in other targets.
3. IMAGE_GATHER decoder generation is for now disabled and to be
done later.
[/Valery]
Patch By: Sam Kolton
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D16723
llvm-svn: 261185
Make comments and indentation more consistent.
Rearrange a few things to be in a more consistent order,
such as organizing subtarget features from those describing
an actual device property, and those used as options.
llvm-svn: 258789
Summary:
We had to sets of identical FLAT patterns one inside the
HasFlatAddressSpace predicate and one inside the useFlatForGloabl
predicate. This patch merges these sets into a single pattern
under the isCIVI predicate.
The reason we can remove the predicates is that when MUBUF instructions
are legal, the instruction selector will prefer selecting those over
FLAT instructions because MUBUF patterns have a higher complexity score.
So, in this case having patterns for FLAT instructions will have no effect.
This change also simplifies the process for forcing global address space
loads to use FLAT instructions, since we no only have to disable the
MUBUF patterns instead of having to disable the MUBUF patterns and
enable the FLAT patterns.
Reviewers: arsenm, cfang
Subscribers: llvm-commits
llvm-svn: 256807
These are redundant pairs of nodes defined for
INSERT_VECTOR_ELEMENT/EXTRACT_VECTOR_ELEMENT.
insertelement/extractelement are slightly closer to the corresponding
C++ node name, and has stricter type checking so prefer it.
Update targets to only use these nodes where it is trivial to do so.
AArch64, ARM, and Mips all have various type errors on simple replacement,
so they will need work to fix.
Example from AArch64:
def : Pat<(sext_inreg (vector_extract (v16i8 V128:$Rn), VectorIndexB:$idx), i8),
(i32 (SMOVvi8to32 V128:$Rn, VectorIndexB:$idx))>;
Which is trying to do sext_inreg i8, i8.
llvm-svn: 255359
Matt Arsenault