We were accidentally folding a sign/zero extend in to address arithmetic in a different BB when the extend wasn't available there.
Cross BB fast-isel isn't safe, so restrict this to only when the extend is in the same BB as the use.
llvm-svn: 236764
This patch corresponds to review:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9440
It adds a new register class to the PPC back end to contain single precision
values in VSX registers. Additionally, it adds scalar loads and stores for
VSX registers.
llvm-svn: 236755
This is a follow-on to r236740 where I took Andrea's advice
in D9504 to remove a redundant pattern...except that I removed
the wrong pattern!
AFAICT, there is no change in the final code produced because
subsequent passes would clean up the extra instructions created
by the more complicated pattern.
llvm-svn: 236743
Finish the job that was abandoned in D6958 following the refactoring in
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL230221:
1. Uncomment the intrinsic def for the AVX r_Int instruction.
2. Add missing r_Int entries to the load folding tables; there are already
tests that check these in "test/Codegen/X86/fold-load-unops.ll", so I
haven't added any more in this patch.
3. Add patterns to solve PR21507 ( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21507 ).
So instead of this:
movaps %xmm0, %xmm1
rcpss %xmm1, %xmm1
movss %xmm1, %xmm0
We should now get:
rcpss %xmm0, %xmm0
And instead of this:
vsqrtss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm1
vblendps $1, %xmm1, %xmm0, %xmm0 ## xmm0 = xmm1[0],xmm0[1,2,3]
We should now get:
vsqrtss %xmm0, %xmm0, %xmm0
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9504
llvm-svn: 236740
http://reviews.llvm.org/D9517
The separate header file allows to reuse the MIPS ABI flags structure
constants in other LLVM tools like the llvm-readobj.
No functional changes.
llvm-svn: 236732
Added intrinsics for the instructions. CC parameter of the intrinsics was changed from i8 to i32 according to the spec.
By Igor Breger (igor.breger@intel.com)
llvm-svn: 236714
Summary: This will enable the IAS to reject floating point instructions if soft-float is enabled.
Reviewers: dsanders, echristo
Reviewed By: dsanders
Subscribers: jfb, llvm-commits, mpf
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9053
llvm-svn: 236713
When folding a load in to another instruction, we need to fix the class of the index register
Otherwise, it could be something like GR64 not GR64_NOSP and would fail the machine verifier.
llvm-svn: 236644
The patch disabled unrolling in loop vectorization pass when VF==1 on x86 architecture,
by setting MaxInterleaveFactor to 1. Unrolling in loop vectorization pass may introduce
the cost of overflow check, memory boundary check and extra prologue/epilogue code when
regular unroller will unroll the loop another time. Disable it when VF==1 remove the
unnecessary cost on x86. The same can be done for other platforms after verifying
interleaving/memory bound checking to be not perf critical on those platforms.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9515
llvm-svn: 236613
With neon enabled, we reach SelectBinaryFPOp and are able to get registers for a <2 x double> add.
However, we shouldn't actually attempt arithmetic on it as ARMIselLowering says "v2f64 is legal so that QR subregs can be extracted as f64 elements, but neither Neon nor VFP support any arithmetic operations on it."
This commit disables SelectBinaryFPOp for any vector types. There's already a FIXME to try handle neon. Doing so would require fixing this conditional which isn't safe for vectors 'VT == MVT::f64 || VT == MVT::i64'
llvm-svn: 236609
The initial code drop for VSX swap optimization permitted the
optimization only when all operations in a web of related computation
are lane-insensitive. For some lane-sensitive operations, we can
still permit the optimization provided that we make adjustments to
those operations. This patch adds special handling for vector splats
so that their presence doesn't kill the optimization.
Vector splats are lane-sensitive since they identify by number a
vector element to be used as the source of a splat. When swap
optimizations take place, the desired vector element will move to the
opposite doubleword of the quadword vector. We thus replace the index
I by (I + N/2) % N, where N is the number of elements in the vector.
A new test case is added to test that swap optimization succeeds when
vector splats are present, and that the proper input element is used
as the source of the splat.
An ancillary change removes SH_BUILDVEC as one of the kinds of special
handling that may be required by VSX swap optimization. From
experience with GCC, I had expected to need some modifications for
vector build operations, but I did not find that to be the case.
llvm-svn: 236606
Since r234249, i1 are sext instead of zext; because of that, doing
"CMP rN, #0; IT EQ/NE" isn't correct anymore.
"TST #1" is the conservatively correct alternative - the tradeoff being
that it doesn't have a 16-bit encoding -, so use that instead.
llvm-svn: 236569
This patch adds the minimum plumbing necessary to use IR-level
fast-math-flags (FMF) in the backend without actually using
them for anything yet. This is a follow-on to:
http://reviews.llvm.org/rL235997
...which split the existing nsw / nuw / exact flags and FMF
into their own struct.
There are 2 structural changes here:
1. The main diff is that we're preparing to extend the optimization
flags to affect more than just binary SDNodes. Eg, IR intrinsics
( https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=21290 ) or non-binop nodes
that don't even exist in IR such as FMA, FNEG, etc.
2. The other change is that we're actually copying the FP fast-math-flags
from the IR instructions to SDNodes.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D8900
llvm-svn: 236546
The register set for LDMIA begins at offset 3, not 4. We were previously
missing the short encoding of this instruction in the case where the base
register was the first register in the register set.
Also clean up some dead code:
- The isARMLowRegister check is redundant with what VerifyLowRegs does;
replace with an assert.
- Remove handling of LDMDB instruction, which has no short encoding (and
does not appear in ReduceTable).
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9485
llvm-svn: 236535
This adds intrinsics to allow access to all of the z13 vector instructions.
Note that instructions whose semantics can be described by standard LLVM IR
do not get any intrinsics.
For each instructions whose semantics *cannot* (fully) be described, we
define an LLVM IR target-specific intrinsic that directly maps to this
instruction.
For instructions that also set the condition code, the LLVM IR intrinsic
returns the post-instruction CC value as a second result. Instruction
selection will attempt to detect code that compares that CC value against
constants and use the condition code directly instead.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236527
The ABI specifies that <1 x i128> and <1 x fp128> are supposed to be
passed in vector registers. We do not yet support those types, and
some infrastructure is missing before we can do so.
In order to prevent accidentally generating code violating the ABI,
this patch adds checks to detect those types and error out if user
code attempts to use them.
llvm-svn: 236526
The ABI allows sub-128 vectors to be passed and returned in registers,
with the vector occupying the upper part of a register. We therefore
want to legalize those types by widening the vector rather than promoting
the elements.
The patch includes some simple tests for sub-128 vectors and also tests
that we can recognize various pack sequences, some of which use sub-128
vectors as temporary results. One of these forms is based on the pack
sequences generated by llvmpipe when no intrinsics are used.
Signed unpacks are recognized as BUILD_VECTORs whose elements are
individually sign-extended. Unsigned unpacks can have the equivalent
form with zero extension, but they also occur as shuffles in which some
elements are zero.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236525
The z13 vector facility includes some instructions that operate only on the
high f64 in a v2f64, effectively extending the FP register set from 16
to 32 registers. It's still better to use the old instructions if the
operands happen to fit though, since the older instructions have a shorter
encoding.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236524
The architecture doesn't really have any native v4f32 operations except
v4f32->v2f64 and v2f64->v4f32 conversions, with only half of the v4f32
elements being used. Even so, using vector registers for <4 x float>
and scalarising individual operations is much better than generating
completely scalar code, since there's much less register pressure.
It's also more efficient to do v4f32 comparisons by extending to 2
v2f64s, comparing those, then packing the result.
This particularly helps with llvmpipe.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236523
This adds ABI and CodeGen support for the v2f64 type, which is natively
supported by z13 instructions.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236522
This the first of a series of patches to add CodeGen support exploiting
the instructions of the z13 vector facility. This patch adds support
for the native integer vector types (v16i8, v8i16, v4i32, v2i64).
When the vector facility is present, we default to the new vector ABI.
This is characterized by two major differences:
- Vector types are passed/returned in vector registers
(except for unnamed arguments of a variable-argument list function).
- Vector types are at most 8-byte aligned.
The reason for the choice of 8-byte vector alignment is that the hardware
is able to efficiently load vectors at 8-byte alignment, and the ABI only
guarantees 8-byte alignment of the stack pointer, so requiring any higher
alignment for vectors would require dynamic stack re-alignment code.
However, for compatibility with old code that may use vector types, when
*not* using the vector facility, the old alignment rules (vector types
are naturally aligned) remain in use.
These alignment rules are not only implemented at the C language level
(implemented in clang), but also at the LLVM IR level. This is done
by selecting a different DataLayout string depending on whether the
vector ABI is in effect or not.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236521
This patch adds support for the z13 processor type and its vector facility,
and adds MC support for all new instructions provided by that facilily.
Apart from defining the new instructions, the main changes are:
- Adding VR128, VR64 and VR32 register classes.
- Making FP64 a subclass of VR64 and FP32 a subclass of VR32.
- Adding a D(V,B) addressing mode for scatter/gather operations
- Adding 1-, 2-, and 3-bit immediate operands for some 4-bit fields.
Until now all immediate operands have been the same width as the
underlying field (hence the assert->return change in decode[SU]ImmOperand).
In addition, sys::getHostCPUName is extended to detect running natively
on a z13 machine.
Based on a patch by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236520
This reverts commit r236360.
This change exposed a bug in WinEHPrepare by opting win32 code into EH
preparation. We already knew that WinEHPrepare has bugs, and is the
status quo for x64, so I don't think that's a reason to hold off on this
change. I disabled exceptions in the sanitizer tests in r236505 and an
earlier revision.
llvm-svn: 236508
This patch introduces a new pass that computes the safe point to insert the
prologue and epilogue of the function.
The interest is to find safe points that are cheaper than the entry and exits
blocks.
As an example and to avoid regressions to be introduce, this patch also
implements the required bits to enable the shrink-wrapping pass for AArch64.
** Context **
Currently we insert the prologue and epilogue of the method/function in the
entry and exits blocks. Although this is correct, we can do a better job when
those are not immediately required and insert them at less frequently executed
places.
The job of the shrink-wrapping pass is to identify such places.
** Motivating example **
Let us consider the following function that perform a call only in one branch of
a if:
define i32 @f(i32 %a, i32 %b) {
%tmp = alloca i32, align 4
%tmp2 = icmp slt i32 %a, %b
br i1 %tmp2, label %true, label %false
true:
store i32 %a, i32* %tmp, align 4
%tmp4 = call i32 @doSomething(i32 0, i32* %tmp)
br label %false
false:
%tmp.0 = phi i32 [ %tmp4, %true ], [ %a, %0 ]
ret i32 %tmp.0
}
On AArch64 this code generates (removing the cfi directives to ease
readabilities):
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
LBB0_2: ; %false
mov sp, x29
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
ret
With shrink-wrapping we could generate:
_f: ; @f
; BB#0:
cmp w0, w1
b.ge LBB0_2
; BB#1: ; %true
stp x29, x30, [sp, #-16]!
mov x29, sp
sub sp, sp, #16 ; =16
stur w0, [x29, #-4]
sub x1, x29, #4 ; =4
mov w0, wzr
bl _doSomething
add sp, x29, #16 ; =16
ldp x29, x30, [sp], #16
LBB0_2: ; %false
ret
Therefore, we would pay the overhead of setting up/destroying the frame only if
we actually do the call.
** Proposed Solution **
This patch introduces a new machine pass that perform the shrink-wrapping
analysis (See the comments at the beginning of ShrinkWrap.cpp for more details).
It then stores the safe save and restore point into the MachineFrameInfo
attached to the MachineFunction.
This information is then used by the PrologEpilogInserter (PEI) to place the
related code at the right place. This pass runs right before the PEI.
Unlike the original paper of Chow from PLDI’88, this implementation of
shrink-wrapping does not use expensive data-flow analysis and does not need hack
to properly avoid frequently executed point. Instead, it relies on dominance and
loop properties.
The pass is off by default and each target can opt-in by setting the
EnableShrinkWrap boolean to true in their derived class of TargetPassConfig.
This setting can also be overwritten on the command line by using
-enable-shrink-wrap.
Before you try out the pass for your target, make sure you properly fix your
emitProlog/emitEpilog/adjustForXXX method to cope with basic blocks that are not
necessarily the entry block.
** Design Decisions **
1. ShrinkWrap is its own pass right now. It could frankly be merged into PEI but
for debugging and clarity I thought it was best to have its own file.
2. Right now, we only support one save point and one restore point. At some
point we can expand this to several save point and restore point, the impacted
component would then be:
- The pass itself: New algorithm needed.
- MachineFrameInfo: Hold a list or set of Save/Restore point instead of one
pointer.
- PEI: Should loop over the save point and restore point.
Anyhow, at least for this first iteration, I do not believe this is interesting
to support the complex cases. We should revisit that when we motivating
examples.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9210
<rdar://problem/3201744>
llvm-svn: 236507
It adds v1i128 to the appropriate register classes and checks parameter passing
and return values.
This is related to http://reviews.llvm.org/D9081, which will add instructions
that exploit the v1i128 datatype.
Phabricator review: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9475
llvm-svn: 236503
Summary:
When using the N64 ABI, element-indices use the i64 type instead of i32.
In many cases, we can use iPTR to account for this but additional patterns
and pseudo's are also required.
This fixes most (but not quite all) failures in the test-suite when using
N64 and MSA together.
Reviewers: vkalintiris
Reviewed By: vkalintiris
Subscribers: llvm-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D9342
llvm-svn: 236494
When forming an IT block from the first MOV here:
%R2<def> = t2MOVr %R0, pred:1, pred:%CPSR, opt:%noreg
%R3<def> = tMOVr %R0<kill>, pred:14, pred:%noreg
the move in to R3 is moved out of the IT block so that later instructions on the same predicate can be inside this block, and we can share the IT instruction.
However, when moving the R3 copy out of the IT block, we need to clear its kill flags for anything in use at this point in time, ie, R0 here.
This appeases the machine verifier which thought that R0 wasn't defined when used.
I have a test case, but its extremely register allocator specific. It would be too fragile to commit a test which depends on the register allocator here.
llvm-svn: 236468
At the moment, all subregs defined by the SystemZ target can be modified
independently of the wider register. E.g. writing to a GR32 does not
change the upper 32 bits of the GR64. Writing to an FP32 does not change
the lower 32 bits of the FP64.
Hoewver, the upcoming support for the vector extension redefines FP64 as
one half of a V128. Floating-point operations leave the other half of
a V128 in an unpredictable state, so it's no longer the case that writing
to an FP32 leaves the bits of the underlying register (the V128) alone.
I'd prefer to have separate subreg_ names for this situation, so that
it's obvious at a glance whether we're talking about a subreg that leaves
the other parts of the register alone.
No behavioral change intended.
Patch originally by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236433
We know what MemoryKind an operand has at the time we construct it,
so we might as well just record it in an unused part of the structure.
This makes it easier to add scatter/gather addresses later.
No behavioral change intended.
Patch originally by Richard Sandiford.
llvm-svn: 236432
It seems SystemZTargetLowering::getTargetNodeName got out of sync with
some recent changes to the SystemZISD opcode list. Add back all the
missing opcodes (and re-sort to the same order as SystemISelLowering.h).
llvm-svn: 236430
Removed code that was replicating v8i16 'shift + mask' implementation that is done more nicely by making use of LowerScalarImmediateShift
llvm-svn: 236388
Pete Cooper