Summary:
This catches malformed mir files which specify alignment as log2 instead of pow2.
See https://reviews.llvm.org/D65945 for reference,
This is patch is part of a series to introduce an Alignment type.
See this thread for context: http://lists.llvm.org/pipermail/llvm-dev/2019-July/133851.html
See this patch for the introduction of the type: https://reviews.llvm.org/D64790
Reviewers: courbet
Subscribers: MatzeB, qcolombet, dschuff, arsenm, sdardis, nemanjai, jvesely, nhaehnle, hiraditya, kbarton, asb, rbar, johnrusso, simoncook, apazos, sabuasal, niosHD, jrtc27, MaskRay, zzheng, edward-jones, atanasyan, rogfer01, MartinMosbeck, brucehoult, the_o, PkmX, jocewei, jsji, Petar.Avramovic, asbirlea, s.egerton, pzheng, llvm-commits
Tags: #llvm
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D67433
llvm-svn: 371608
MipsLongBranchPass and MipsHazardSchedule passes are joined to one pass
because of mutual conflict. When MipsHazardSchedule inserts 'nop's, it
potentially breaks some jumps, so they have to be expanded to long
branches. When some branch is expanded to long branch, it potentially
creates a hazard situation, which should be fixed by adding nops.
New pass is called MipsBranchExpansion, it combines these two passes,
and runs them alternately until one of them reports no changes were made.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46641
llvm-svn: 332977
MipsLongBranchPass and MipsHazardSchedule passes are joined to one pass
because of mutual conflict. When MipsHazardSchedule inserts 'nop's, it
potentially breaks some jumps, so they have to be expanded to long
branches. When some branch is expanded to long branch, it potentially
creates a hazard situation, which should be fixed by adding nops.
New pass is called MipsBranchExpansion, it combines these two passes,
and runs them alternately until one of them reports no changes were made.
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46641
llvm-svn: 332834
Add support for this target hook, covering MIPS, microMIPS and MIPSR6, along
with some tests. Also add missing getOppositeBranchOpc() cases exposed by the
tests.
Reviewers: atanasyan, abeserminji, smaksimovic
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46794
llvm-svn: 332446
Guillaume Chatelet