Summary:
__atomic_load's allows it's first argument to be a pointer to a const type. However the second argument is an output parameter and must be a pointer to non-const.
This patch fixes the signature of __atomic_load generated by clang so that it respects the above requirements.
Reviewers: rsmith, majnemer
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D13420
llvm-svn: 264967
The size savings are significant, and from what I can tell, both ICC and GCC do this.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18573
llvm-svn: 264966
Summary:
This prevents errors when you invoke clang with a flag that the NVPTX
toolchain doesn't support. For example, on x86-64,
clang -mthread-model single -x c++ /dev/null -o /dev/null
should output just one error about "invalid thread model 'single' in
'-mthread-model single' for this target"; x86-64 doesn't support
-mthread-model, but we shouldn't also instantiate a NVPTX target!
Reviewers: echristo
Subscribers: tra, sunfish, cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18629
llvm-svn: 264965
With this patch, by a constexpr function is implicitly host+device
unless:
a) it's a variadic function (variadic functions are not allowed on the
device side), or
b) it's preceeded by a __device__ overload in a system header.
The restriction on overloading __host__ __device__ functions on the
basis of their CUDA attributes remains in place, but we use (b) to allow
us to define __device__ overloads for constexpr functions in cmath,
which would otherwise be __host__ __device__ and thus not overloadable.
You can disable this behavior with -fno-cuda-host-device-constexpr.
Reviewers: tra, rnk, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18380
llvm-svn: 264964
Summary:
This is necessary for a future patch which will make all constexpr
functions implicitly host+device. cmath may declare constexpr
functions, but these we do *not* want to be host+device. The forward
declares added in this patch prevent this (because the rule will be,
constexpr functions become implicitly host+device unless they're
preceeded by a decl with __device__).
Reviewers: tra
Subscribers: cfe-commits, rnk, rsmith
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18539
llvm-svn: 264963
If we make R_MIPS_LO16 a relative relocation, linker:
- never creates R_MIPS_COPY relocation for it
- attempts to create R_MIPS_REL32 dynamic relocation if R_MIPS_LO16's
target is a preemptible symbol
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18607
llvm-svn: 264956
Fixes https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=27129 which is crash involving type
aliases and template type diffing. Template arguments for type aliases and
template arguments for the underlying desugared type may not have one-to-one
relations, which could mess us the attempt to get more information from the
desugared type. For type aliases, ignore the iterator over the desugared type.
llvm-svn: 264940
r264884 introduced a helper to escape the backslashes in the source file
path, but I since discovered an existing mechanism to escape strings.
llvm-svn: 264936
Commit r260791 contained an error in that it would introduce a cross-module
reference in the old module. It also introduced O(N^2) complexity in the
module cloner by requiring the entire module to be visited for each function.
Fix both of these problems by avoiding use of the CloneDebugInfoMetadata
function (which is only designed to do intra-module cloning) and cloning
function-attached metadata in the same way that we clone all other metadata.
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18583
llvm-svn: 264935
#endif was one line too low. If KMP_USE_ADAPTIVE_LOCKS is 0,
then queuing locks would incorrectly use drdpa lock mechanism.
This is a fix for https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26649
llvm-svn: 264934
Summary:
When the code is compiled for arm32 and the builtin `__va_list` declaration is created by `CreateAAPCSABIBuiltinVaListDecl`, the declaration is not saved in the `ASTContext` which may lead to a compilation error or crash.
Minimal reproducer I was able to find:
**header.h**
```
#include <stdarg.h>
typedef va_list va_list_1;
```
**test.cpp**
```
typedef __builtin_va_list va_list_2;
void foo(const char* format, ...) { va_list args; va_start( args, format ); }
```
Steps to reproduce:
```
clang -x c++-header --target=armv7l-linux-eabihf header.h
clang -c -include header.h --target=armv7l-linux-eabihf test.cpp
```
Compilation error:
```
error: non-const lvalue reference to type '__builtin_va_list'
cannot bind to a value of unrelated type 'va_list' (aka '__builtin_va_list')
```
Compiling the same code as a C source leads to a crash:
```
clang --target=armv7l-linux-eabihf header.h
clang -c -x c -include header.h --target=armv7l-linux-eabihf test.cpp
```
Reviewers: logan, rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits, asl, aemerson, rengolin
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18557
llvm-svn: 264930
For the same reason as the corresponding load change.
Note that ExpandStore is completely broken for non-byte sized element
vector stores, but preserve the current broken behavior which has tests
for it. The behavior should be the same, but now introduces a new typed
store that is incorrectly split later rather than doing it directly.
llvm-svn: 264928
On AMDGPU we want to be able to promote i64/f64 loads to v2i32.
If the access is unaligned, this would conclude that since i64 is legal,
it would convert it back to i64 and there is an endless legalization
loop.
Extract the logic for scalarizing the load into a new TargetLowering
function, where this can also replace the custom function AMDGPU
has for this.
llvm-svn: 264927
Widening a PHI requires us to insert a trunc.
The logical place for this trunc is in the same BB as the PHI.
This is not possible if the BB is terminated by a catchswitch.
This fixes PR27133.
llvm-svn: 264926
Fix for issue introduced D17297, where we were breaking early from the loop detecting consecutive loads which could leave us thinking a consecutive load with zeros was possible.
llvm-svn: 264922
Summary:
IsOverload has a param named UseUsingDeclRules. But as far as I can
tell, it should be called UseMemberUsingDeclRules. That is, it only
applies to "using" declarations inside classes or structs.
Reviewers: rsmith
Subscribers: cfe-commits
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18538
llvm-svn: 264920
Summary:
Currently it's a module pass. Make it a function pass so that we can
move it to PassManagerBuilder's EP_EarlyAsPossible extension point,
which only accepts function passes.
Reviewers: rnk
Subscribers: tra, llvm-commits, jholewinski
Differential Revision: http://reviews.llvm.org/D18615
llvm-svn: 264919
Pete Cooper