Because of the rules of base-class lookup* and the restrictions on typedefs, it
was actually impossible for this to cause any problems more serious than the
spurious acceptance of
template <class T> class A : B<A> { ... };
instead of
template <class T> class A : B<A<T> > { ... };
but I'm sure we can all agree that that is a very important restriction which
is well worth making another Parser->Sema call for.
(*) n.b. clang++ does not implement these rules correctly; we are not ignoring
non-type names
llvm-svn: 91792
is difficult because they're so terribly, terribly ambiguous.
We implement access declarations in terms of using declarations, which is
quite reasonable. However, we should really persist the access/using
distinction in the AST and use the appropriate name in diagnostics. This
isn't a priority, so I'll just file a PR and hope someone else does it. :)
llvm-svn: 91095
intended. On the first testcase in the bug, we now produce:
cxx-decl.cpp:12:2: error: unexpected ':' in nested name specifier
y:a a2;
^
::
instead of:
t.cc:8:1: error: C++ requires a type specifier for all declarations
x:a a2;
^
t.cc:8:2: error: invalid token after top level declarator
x:a a2;
^
;
t.cc:9:11: error: use of undeclared identifier 'a2'
x::a a3 = a2;
^
llvm-svn: 90713
The following attributes are currently supported in C++0x attribute
lists (and in GNU ones as well):
- align() - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations and what entities it may apply to
- final - semantics believed to be conformant to CWG issue 817's proposed
wording, except for redeclarations
- noreturn - semantics believed to be conformant to n3000, except for
redeclarations
- carries_dependency - currently ignored (this is an optimization hint)
llvm-svn: 89543
two classes, one for typenames and one for values; this seems to have some
support from Doug if not necessarily from the extremely-vague-on-this-point
standard. Track the location of the 'typename' keyword in a using-typename
decl. Make a new lookup result for unresolved values and deal with it in
most places.
llvm-svn: 89184
handling template template parameters properly. This refactoring:
- Parses template template arguments as id-expressions, representing
the result of the parse as a template name (Action::TemplateTy)
rather than as an expression (lame!).
- Represents all parsed template arguments via a new parser-specific
type, ParsedTemplateArgument, which stores the kind of template
argument (type, non-type, template) along with all of the source
information about the template argument. This replaces an ad hoc
set of 3 vectors (one for a void*, which was either a type or an
expression; one for a bit telling whether the first was a type or
an expression; and one for a single source location pointing at
the template argument).
- Moves TemplateIdAnnotation into the new Parse/Template.h. It never
belonged in the Basic library anyway.
llvm-svn: 86708
appears in a deprecated context. In the new strategy, we emit the warnings
as usual unless we're currently parsing a declaration, where "declaration" is
restricted to mean a decl group or a few special cases in Objective C. If
we *are* parsing a declaration, we queue up the deprecation warnings until
the declaration has been completely parsed, and then emit them only if the
decl is not deprecated.
We also standardize the bookkeeping for deprecation so as to avoid special cases.
llvm-svn: 85998
representation of a C++ unqualified-id, along with a single parsing
function (Parser::ParseUnqualifiedId) that will parse all of the
various forms of unqualified-id in C++.
Replace the representation of the declarator name in Declarator with
the new UnqualifiedId class, simplifying declarator-id parsing
considerably and providing more source-location information to
Sema. In the future, I hope to migrate all of the other
unqualified-id-parsing code over to this single representation, then
begin to merge actions that are currently only different because we
didn't have a unqualified notion of the name in the parser.
llvm-svn: 85851
specializations such as:
friend class std::vector<int>;
by using the same code path as explicit specializations, customized to
reference an existing ClassTemplateSpecializationDecl (or build a new
"undeclared" one).
llvm-svn: 82875
class templates. We now treat friend class templates much more like
normal class templates, except that they still get special name lookup
rules. Fixes PR5057 and eliminates a bunch of spurious diagnostics in
<iostream>.
llvm-svn: 82848
- after "using", show anything that can be a nested-name-specifier.
- after "using namespace", show any visible namespaces or namespace aliases
- after "namespace", show any namespace definitions in the current scope
- after "namespace identifier = ", show any visible namespaces or
namespace aliases
llvm-svn: 82251
will provide the names of various enumerations currently
visible. Introduced filtering of code-completion results when we build
the result set, so that we can identify just the kinds of declarations
we want.
This implementation is incomplete for C++, since we don't consider
that the token after the tag keyword could start a
nested-name-specifier.
llvm-svn: 82222
The problem this change addresses is that we treat __is_pod and
__is_empty as keywords in C++, because they are built-in type traits
in GCC >= 4.3. However, GNU libstdc++ 4.2 (and possibly earlier
versions) define implementation-detail struct templates named __is_pod
and __is_empty.
This commit solves the problem by recognizing
struct __is_pod
and
struct __is_empty
as special token sequences. When one of these token sequences is
encountered, the keyword (__is_pod or __is_empty) is implicitly
downgraded to an identifier so that parsing can continue. This is an
egregious hack, but it has the virtue of "just working" whether
someone is using libstdc++ 4.2 or not, without the need for special
flags.
llvm-svn: 80988
x->Base::f
We no longer try to "enter" the context of the type that "x" points
to. Instead, we drag that object type through the parser and pass it
into the Sema routines that need to know how to perform lookup within
member access expressions.
We now implement most of the crazy name lookup rules in C++
[basic.lookup.classref] for non-templated code, including performing
lookup both in the context of the type referred to by the member
access and in the scope of the member access itself and then detecting
ambiguities when the two lookups collide (p1 and p4; p3 and p7 are
still TODO). This change also corrects our handling of name lookup
within template arguments of template-ids inside the
nested-name-specifier (p6; we used to look into the scope of the
object expression for them) and fixes PR4703.
I have disabled some tests that involve member access expressions
where the object expression has dependent type, because we don't yet
have the ability to describe dependent nested-name-specifiers starting
with an identifier.
llvm-svn: 80843
TypenameType if getTypeName is looking at a member of an unknown
specialization. This allows us to properly parse class templates that
derived from type that could only otherwise be described by a typename type,
e.g.,
template<class T> struct X {};
template<typename T> struct Y : public X<T>::X { };
Fixes PR4381.
llvm-svn: 80123
their members, including member class template, member function
templates, and member classes and functions of member templates.
To actually parse the nested-name-specifiers that qualify the name of
an out-of-line definition of a member template, e.g.,
template<typename X> template<typename Y>
X Outer<X>::Inner1<Y>::foo(Y) {
return X();
}
we need to look for the template names (e.g., "Inner1") as a member of
the current instantiation (Outer<X>), even before we have entered the
scope of the current instantiation. Since we can't do this in general
(i.e., we should not be looking into all dependent
nested-name-specifiers as if they were the current instantiation), we
rely on the parser to tell us when it is parsing a declaration
specifier sequence, and, therefore, when we should consider the
current scope specifier to be a current instantiation.
Printing of complicated, dependent nested-name-specifiers may be
somewhat broken by this commit; I'll add tests for this issue and fix
the problem (if it still exists) in a subsequent commit.
llvm-svn: 80044
FriendFunctionDecl, and create instances as appropriate.
The design of FriendFunctionDecl is still somewhat up in the air; you can
befriend arbitrary types of functions --- methods, constructors, etc. ---
and it's not clear that this representation captures that very well.
We'll have a better picture when we start consuming this data in access
control.
llvm-svn: 78653
elsewhere. Very slightly decouples DeclSpec users from knowing the exact
diagnostics to report, and makes it easier to provide different diagnostics in
some places.
llvm-svn: 77990
John McCall