Commit Graph

5 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Eli Friedman 052f87ae36 Revert r361460
It regresses https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38309 (represented
by the testcase test/Transforms/GlobalOpt/globalsra-multigep.ll).

llvm-svn: 361581
2019-05-24 01:03:51 +00:00
Christian Bruel 4a7da98bd9 [GlobalOpt] recognize dead struct fields and propagate values
Summary:
Allow struct fields SRA and dead stores. This works by considering fields accesses from getElementPtr to be considered as a possible pointer root that can be cleaned up.
We check that the variable can be SRA by recursively checking the sub expressions with the new isSafeSubSROAGEP function.

basically this allows the array in following C code  to be optimized out 

struct Expr {
  int a[2];
  int b;
};

static struct Expr e;

int foo (int i)
{
  e.b = 2;
  e.a[i] = 1;
  return e.b;
}


Reviewers: greened, bkramer, nicholas, jmolloy

Reviewed By: jmolloy

Subscribers: llvm-commits

Tags: #llvm

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D61911

llvm-svn: 361460
2019-05-23 05:53:10 +00:00
Eric Christopher cee313d288 Revert "Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass.""
The reversion apparently deleted the test/Transforms directory.

Will be re-reverting again.

llvm-svn: 358552
2019-04-17 04:52:47 +00:00
Eric Christopher a863435128 Temporarily Revert "Add basic loop fusion pass."
As it's causing some bot failures (and per request from kbarton).

This reverts commit r358543/ab70da07286e618016e78247e4a24fcb84077fda.

llvm-svn: 358546
2019-04-17 02:12:23 +00:00
David Green fc4b0fe0a2 [GlobalOpt] Test array indices inside structs for out-of-bounds accesses
We now, from clang, can turn arrays of
  static short g_data[] = {16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 16, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0};
into structs of the form
  @g_data = internal global <{ [8 x i16], [8 x i16] }> ...

GlobalOpt will incorrectly SROA it, not realising that the access to the first
element may overflow into the second. This fixes it by checking geps more
thoroughly.

I believe this makes the globalsra-partial.ll test case invalid as the %i value
could be out of bounds. I've re-purposed it as a negative test for this case.

Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D49816

llvm-svn: 338192
2018-07-28 08:20:10 +00:00